As we are nearing EOL for firefly release all nightlies run on firefly
branch were disabled.
Let me know if this presents any problems.
Thx
YuriW
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
In preparation to sepia lab move, nightlies' schedules were moved to
the ovh (openstack) lab.
See details here - http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph-releases/wiki/ovh
Please let me know if you see any problems.
PS: I will optimize times/frequencies in next several days/weeks
Thx
YuriW
--
To
This release QE validation took longer time due to the #11104
additional fixing/testing and discovered related to it issues ##13794,
13622
We agreed to release v0.80.11 based on tests results.
Thx
YuriW
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Yuri Weinstein <ywein...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
Loic,
I am not actually sure about resolving #11104.
Warren?
Thx
YuriW
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Loic Dachary <ldach...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Yuri,
>
> Thanks for the update :-) Should we mark #11104 as resolved ?
>
> Cheers
>
> On 16/11/2015
(rados suite/jewel - on hold for the time being to avoid queue overload)
But other suites have been added to the schedule:
http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph-releases/wiki/Sepia
Pls let me know if you see problems or any issues.
Thx
YuriW
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
As giant was declared EOL all related suites had been removed from the schedule:
#giant EOL 15 18 * * 3,6 teuthology-suite -v -c giant -k distro -m vps
-s upgrade/dumpling-firefly-x ~/vps.yaml
#giant EOL 18 18 * * 3,6 teuthology-suite -v -c giant -k distro -m vps
-s upgrade/firefly-x ~/vps.yaml
Summary of suites executed for this release can be found in
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11644
rados - 1/7th passed
rbd - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11104
rgw - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11104
fs - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11104, http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13630
krbd -
I was thinking of teuthology-nuke thou !
Thx
YuriW
- Original Message -
From: Yuri Weinstein ywein...@redhat.com
To: Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
Cc: Ceph Development ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 9:33:26 AM
Subject: Re: timeout 120 teuthology-killl is highly
Loic
I don't use teuthology-kill simultaneously only sequentially.
As far as run time, just as a note, when we use 'stale' arg and it invokes
ipmitool interface it does take awhile to finish.
Thx
YuriW
- Original Message -
From: Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
To: Ceph Development
I am all for it!
Thx
YuriW
- Original Message -
From: Sage Weil s...@newdream.net
To: Yuri Weinstein ywein...@redhat.com
Cc: se...@ceph.com, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, Loic Dachary
ldach...@redhat.com, Xinxin Shu xinxin@intel.com, Alfredo Deza
ad...@redhat.com
Sent: Wednesday
!) and tested
Thx
YuriW
- Original Message -
From: Yuri Weinstein ywein...@redhat.com
To: Ceph Development ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Loic Dachary ldach...@redhat.com, Xinxin Shu xinxin@intel.com
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 9:37:20 AM
Subject: firefly v0.80.10 QE validation status 6/15/2015
Sage
We still running nightlies on next and branches.
Just wanted to reaffirm that this is not time yet to start scheduling suites on
infernalis?
Thx
YuriW
- Original Message -
From: Sage Weil sw...@redhat.com
To: ceph-annou...@ceph.com, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org,
QE validation is almost completed (there are a couple of jobs that are still
running)
All statis details were summarized in http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11090
Highlights (by suite/issue):
rados #11914 needs Sam's approval
kcephfs n/a needs Greg's approval
samba #6613 needs Greg's approval
Then it still in the queue and I will reschedule to pick up the latest code.
Thx
YuriW
- Original Message -
From: Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
To: Yuri Weinstein ywein...@redhat.com
Cc: Ceph Development ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, Xinxin Shu
xinxin@intel.com
Sent: Friday, June 5
Loic
Thx for the heads up.
Would that touch only the rgw suite?
Thx
YuriW
- Original Message -
From: Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
To: Yuri Weinstein ywein...@redhat.com
Cc: Ceph Development ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, Xinxin Shu
xinxin@intel.com
Sent: Friday, June 5, 2015 2:11:44
/issues/11492 .
Thx
YuriW
- Original Message -
From: Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
To: Yuri Weinstein ywein...@redhat.com
Cc: Ceph Development ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, Abhishek L
abhishek.lekshma...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 5:42:12 AM
Subject: hammer branch for v0.94.2
I usually use:
priority [90,100]
for point releases validations.
This is a good thread to bring up for open approval/disapproval.
Does that sound reasonable ??
Thx
YuriW
- Original Message -
From: Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
To: Ceph Development ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Sent:
passed on all distros)?
Thx
YuriW
- Original Message -
From: Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
To: Yuri Weinstein ywein...@redhat.com
Cc: Ceph Development ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, Abhishek L
abhishek.lekshma...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 5:42:12 AM
Subject: hammer branch
- Original Message -
From: Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
To: Yuri Weinstein ywein...@redhat.com
Cc: Ceph Development ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, Abhishek L
abhishek.lekshma...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 9:25:25 AM
Subject: Re: hammer branch for v0.94.2 ready for QE
Hi Yuri
QE validation of this release has been completed and it's ready for next steps.
All tests results and notes were summarized in
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11153 QE Validation section.
Thx
YuriW
- Original Message -
From: Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
To: Yuri Weinstein ywein
We have a PR https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/pull/414 that addressed part
of this issue, e.g. added hammer-x to the mix (it's ready to be merged).
We also have two tickets where requirements for this suite were captured:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11413
Yea, Sage, that sounds reasonable.
I added a ticket to capture this plan (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11413)
and will add those tests soon.
Please add your comments to the ticket above.
I am assuming that it will look something like this for dumpling, firefly and
hammer:
dumpling(stable)
Weinstein ywein...@redhat.com
Cc: Sage Weil sw...@redhat.com, Ceph Development
ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2015 5:35:19 PM
Subject: Re: hammer tasks in http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph-releases
On 22/03/2015 17:16, Yuri Weinstein wrote:
Loic, I think the idea was to do
Thx
YuriW
- Original Message -
From: Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
To: Yuri Weinstein ywein...@redhat.com
Cc: Sage Weil sw...@redhat.com, Ceph Development
ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 8:40:02 AM
Subject: Re: hammer tasks in http://tracker.ceph.com/projects
Loic, done, pls review and edit.
Thx
YuriW
- Original Message -
From: Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
To: Yuri Weinstein ywein...@redhat.com
Cc: Sage Weil sw...@redhat.com, Ceph Development
ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 9:10:20 AM
Subject: Re: hammer tasks
Loic, I think the idea was to do more process driven approach for releasing
hammer, e.g. keep track of suites vs. results and open issues, so we can have a
high level view on status at any time before the final cut day.
Do you have any suggestions or objections?
Thx
YuriW
- Original
upgrade/dumpling-firefly-x (to giant)
powercycle
Alfredo, the ticket is in your hands.
Thx
YuriW
- Original Message -
From: Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
To: Yuri Weinstein ywein...@redhat.com
Cc: Ceph Development ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2015 8:30:42 AM
Subject
Ken
PLs se http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10641 for more details
Thx
YuriW
- Original Message -
From: Ken Dreyer kdre...@redhat.com
To: Sage Weil sw...@redhat.com, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org,
ceph-us...@ceph.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2015 3:28:02 PM
Subject: Re: v0.80.8 and librbd
Loic
In case you want to add some comments - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10945
Thx
YuriW
- Original Message -
From: Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
To: Ceph Development ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 7:01:29 AM
Subject: Re: re-running teuthology jobs
The
All issues in http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10560 updated.
Loic - #10801 can be resolved.
v0.67.12 ready for release.
Thx
YuriW
- Original Message -
From: Yuri Weinstein ywein...@redhat.com
To: Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
Cc: Ceph Development ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, Sage Weil
s
Team leads,
Please review QE validation results summary in
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10501
Loic - this RC looks ready for release (in my opinion) !
Thx
YuriW
- Original Message -
From: Yuri Weinstein ywein...@redhat.com
To: Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
Cc: Ceph Development ceph
David,
We had ntp server issue tot too long ago, could be the same or new
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10675
Thx
YuriW
- Original Message -
From: David Zafman dzaf...@redhat.com
To: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 3:08:29 PM
Subject: Clocks out of sync
On
I ran smart and it came back good, hmm
ubuntu@plana74:~$ /usr/libexec/smart.pl
All 4 drives happy as clams
Thx
YuriW
- Original Message -
From: David Zafman dzaf...@redhat.com
To: Sandon Van Ness svann...@redhat.com
Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 1:10:48
re-run some suites if you'd like and we can make a call on this release.
Loic - back to you, let me know what you think.
Thx
YuriW
- Original Message -
From: Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
To: Yuri Weinstein ywein...@redhat.com
Cc: Ceph Development ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, Sage Weil
s
YuriW
- Original Message -
From: Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
To: Yuri Weinstein ywein...@redhat.com
Cc: Ceph Development ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 7:30:06 AM
Subject: Re: giant integration branch for v0.87.1 ready for QE
Hi Yuri,
The giant-backports
Greg, thx, so noted.
Thx
YuriW
- Original Message -
From: Gregory Farnum g...@gregs42.com
To: Yuri Weinstein ywein...@redhat.com, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
Cc: Ceph Development ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 10:44:35 AM
Subject: Re: giant integration
Yeah. Well, the last run alone isn't so important; we want to see a
string of clean runs because a lot of issues aren't reproduced in
every run.
My hope was that we can see all green results for say this giant
release/backport, but I agree that we would need to make our go/no-go decision
never tried
this way, but guessing it should work, what do you think?
Thx
YuriW
- Original Message -
From: Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
To: Yuri Weinstein ywein...@redhat.com
Cc: Ceph Development ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2015 2:12:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Ceph
Loic
Just to double check - giant is *ready* for testing?
(you said below which is not ready for testing maybe wanted o say *now*)
Thx
YuriW
- Original Message -
From: Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
To: Yuri Weinstein ywein...@redhat.com
Cc: Ceph Development ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Dachary l...@dachary.org
To: Yuri Weinstein ywein...@redhat.com
Cc: Ceph Development ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 9:05:31 AM
Subject: dumpling integration branch for v0.67.12 ready for QE
Hi Yuri,
The dumpling integration branch for v0.67.12 as found at
https
YuriW
- Original Message -
From: Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
To: Yuri Weinstein ywein...@redhat.com
Cc: Ceph Development ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 7:30:06 AM
Subject: Re: giant integration branch for v0.87.1 ready for QE
Hi Yuri,
The giant-backports pull
rbd
rgw
fs
krbd
kcephfs
knfs
haddop
samba
rest
multimds
multi-version
upgrade/giant
powecycle
Not sure if we need to run more tests, e.g. giant-x kind of suites for upgrades.
Do you agree with this plan?
Thx
YuriW
- Original Message -
From: Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
To: Yuri
, with higher priority) and then assuming that we
resolved all issues, we will run on the dumpling merged.
Sage, pls correct if this is not what has to be done.
Thx
YuriW
- Original Message -
From: Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
To: Yuri Weinstein ywein...@redhat.com
Cc: Ceph Development
On 10/02/2015 18:19, Yuri Weinstein wrote:
Loic,
The only difference between options if we run suits on merged dumpling vs
dumpling-backports first - is time.
We will have to run suites on the final branch after the merge anyway.
Could you explain why ? After merging dumpling
Great!
As soon as it's merged I will schedule suite to run as listed somewhere below
...
dumpling with higher priority and then giant.
Thx
YuriW
- Original Message -
From: Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
To: Sage Weil s...@newdream.net, Gregory Farnum g...@gregs42.com
Cc: Yuri Weinstein
I am planning to schedule suites with high priority in the Octo and disable
temporarily schedule in crontab today until validations are finished.
Please let me know if you have any concerns about this.
Thx
YuriW
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe ceph-devel in
the body
Loic,
Thanks for the updates!
YuriW
On 2/2/15 3:09 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi Yuri,
There is one remaining issue in the dumpling backports (the details are here
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10560).
The giant integration branch has been updated today with all the pending pull
requests
the upgrade tests results, it's encouraging
:-) I'll let you know when the tests make progress.
On 26/01/2015 18:00, Yuri Weinstein wrote:
Loic,
Thanks for the update.
I ran upgrade/dumpling last week (and all 42 jobs passed in octo and
sepia) to establish a base line. And today running another
Loic,
Thanks for the update.
I ran upgrade/dumpling last week (and all 42 jobs passed in octo and
sepia) to establish a base line. And today running another one,
assuming it will pick up the already merged pull requests.
Let me know when you ready for next steps.
Thx
YuriW
On Mon, Jan 26,
Hi Loic,
I'd love to.
Let's chat on Monday to finalize format.
(
PS: I think format would be easier to maintain like new lines enforced, e,g.
'701575', '701576', '701582', '701590'
ttp://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10543
FAILED assert(m_seed old_pg_num
jobs,...
issue RE
description (this I
Sounds good, Loic
Are you aware BTW about scrape tool written by John Spray?
https://github.com/jcsp/scrape
I use it for test runs analysis often.
Just FYI
Thx
YuriW
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org wrote:
On 17/01/2015 23:08, Yuri Weinstein wrote:
Hi Loic
of errors I
should expect. Are past results archived elsewhere by any chance ?
On 07/01/2015 23:53, Tamil Muthamizhan wrote:
yes, just those suites will do Loic.
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Yuri Weinstein
yuri.weinst...@inktank.com wrote:
Loic,
I think if you run those on bare
Loic,
I think if you run those on bare metals (not vps) they will run on
whatever machines are available in the octo or sepia labs.
Thx
YuriW
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org wrote:
On 07/01/2015 23:20, Tamil Muthamizhan wrote:
hi Loic,
we have a suite to
Here is what we have in vps.yaml now:
overrides:
ceph:
conf:
global:
osd heartbeat grace: 40
What do we want to add?
~
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Sage Weil sw...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2014, Yehuda Sadeh wrote:
Yeah, looking at these logs, it really seem
I thought we could do the same in run-time for vps'es only.
Sage?
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org wrote:
On 11/08/2014 19:34, Yuri Weinstein wrote:
Here is what we have in vps.yaml now:
overrides:
ceph:
conf:
global:
osd heartbeat
I killed several runs that had been running for 2-3 days, hopefully it
will speed up your runs.
Thx
YuriW
On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 6:46 AM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org wrote:
Hi,
It looks like there is a shortage of VPS for some reason:
Technically yes.
If queue is busy - patience is needed.
Assuming that there are no runs in the queue which are hung. Zack is
diligently looking and fixing to prevent hung tests. If we see runs
older then say one day, we kill them (altho 'teuthology-kill' is not
working for me today :( )
Loic
I don't intent to answer all questions, but some info, see inline
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org wrote:
Hi Sam,
TL;DR: what oneliner do you recommend to run upgrade tests for
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/1890 ?
Running the rados suite can be done
58 matches
Mail list logo
