What I'm thinking of is to use fluentd to get log with
quite human-readable format.
Is it same of what you are thinking of?
Shinobu
- Original Message -
From: "Shinobu" <shinobu...@gmail.com>
To: ski...@redhat.com
Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 6:16:18 PM
Subject:
Yes, that is what I'm thinking.
Shinobu
- Original Message -
From: "Loic Dachary" <l...@dachary.org>
To: "Shinobu Kinjo" <ski...@redhat.com>
Cc: "ceph-devel" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2015 12:10:43 AM
>
> Shinobu
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Shinobu" <shinobu...@gmail.com>
> To: ski...@redhat.com
> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 6:16:18 PM
> Subject: Fwd: pet project: OSD compatible daemon
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Loi
Hi Ceph,
I would like to try to write an OSD compatible daemon, as a pet project, to
learn Go and better understand the message flow. I suspect it may also be
useful for debug purposes but that's not my primary incentive.
Has anyone tried something similar ? If so I'd happily contribute
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org wrote:
Hi Ceph,
The title sounds a little strange (Citerias to become a Ceph project) because
I'm not aware of projects initiated by someone external to Ceph that later
became part of the Ceph nebula of projects (as found
On 28/07/2015 10:44, Gregory Farnum wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org wrote:
Hi Ceph,
The title sounds a little strange (Citerias to become a Ceph project)
because I'm not aware of projects initiated by someone external to Ceph that
later became part
The title sound even stranger with non-english words in it. Please excuse the
frenchism :-)
On 28/07/2015 08:38, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi Ceph,
The title sounds a little strange (Citerias to become a Ceph project) because
I'm not aware of projects initiated by someone external to Ceph
- Original Message -
From: Sage Weil s...@newdream.net
To: Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
Cc: Gregory Farnum g...@gregs42.com, Ceph Development
ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Tuesday, 28 July, 2015 10:31:49 PM
Subject: Re: Criteria to become a Ceph project
On Tue, 28 Jul 2015, Loic
On Tue, 28 Jul 2015, Loic Dachary wrote:
On 28/07/2015 10:44, Gregory Farnum wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org wrote:
Hi Ceph,
The title sounds a little strange (Citerias to become a Ceph project)
because I'm not aware of projects initiated
:38, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi Ceph,
The title sounds a little strange (Citerias to become a Ceph project)
because I'm not aware of projects initiated by someone external to Ceph that
later became part of the Ceph nebula of projects (as found at
http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ or http
My first reading of the topic was Citerias (ie a project named
Citerias) to become a Ceph project. It wasn't until I re-read it more
closely that I realized it was criteria. :)
On 07/28/2015 12:51 PM, Joao Eduardo Luis wrote:
On 07/28/2015 07:59 AM, Loic Dachary wrote:
The title sound even
Hi Ceph,
The title sounds a little strange (Citerias to become a Ceph project) because
I'm not aware of projects initiated by someone external to Ceph that later
became part of the Ceph nebula of projects (as found at
http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ or http://github.com/ceph/). I can however
Hello Ketor,
About 1 more years ago, I need a free DFS can be used in AIX
environment as a tiered storage solution for Bank DC, that why the
project.
This project just port the CephFS in Linux kernel to AIX kernel(maybe
RBD in future), so it's a kernel mode AIX cephfs.
But I have multiple
Hi Dennis,
I am interested in your project.
I wrote a Win32 cephfs client https://github.com/ceph/ceph-dokan.
But ceph-dokan runs in user-mode. I see you port code from
kernel cephfs, are you planning to write a kernel mode AIX-cephfs?
Thanks!
2015-03-04 17:59 GMT+08:00 Dennis
Hello,
The ceph cluster now can only be used by Linux system AFAICT, so I
planed to port the ceph client file system from Linux to AIX as a
tiered storage solution in that platform. Below is the source code
repository I've done, which is still in progress. 3 important modules:
1. aixker:
Hi Ceph,
In the past few weeks I issues in the tracker of the Ceph project to update the
progress of the ongoing effort to publish stable point releases (i.e.
backports) at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10640. It started somewhat messy
but turned out to be a convenient point of reference
Dear Ketor,
Congratulations, this is very interesting!
Sorry to ask the obvious question, but does Dokan provide the needed interface
to write a block device client, i.e. an RBD client ?
Cheers, Dan
On 07 Jan 2015, at 05:09, Ketor D d.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
A new project ceph
Hi Dan,
Dokan only provide the interface of filesystem :(
And ceph-dokan only build libcephfs.dll right now.
Librbd and libcephfs share much same code on client side, so implement
the librbd in ceph-dokan project is not hard work.
I will try to implement librbd, librados interface in ceph-dokan
Hi everyone,
A new project ceph-dokan (https://github.com/ceph/ceph-dokan) is
open-source to all now.
You can access the cephfs on Windows directly using ceph-dokan, not by
smb or whatever.
And you will get the full experience and performance of cephfs on Windows now.
Here is something about
It is awesome!
I think CephFS may be the next Big Thing of ceph, since many many
companies are about to use NAS on cloud.
On 7 January 2015 at 12:09, Ketor D d.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
A new project ceph-dokan (https://github.com/ceph/ceph-dokan) is
open-source to all now.
You
, I was able to easily
understand the basic flow of how things are working with respect to the S3.
Following are the methods that will be implemented under the Google API.
GET Service : Lists all of the buckets in a specified project.
DELETE Bucket
GET Bucket
HEAD Bucket
PUT Bucket
DELETE Object
and interest in the
domain where Ceph works.
I'm keen to work on the project of implementing Google cloud storage APIs for
Ceph object gateway. As it's mentioned that modelling the previous S3 API is a
good way to go about this, so can anyone please point me in the direction where
I can find
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013, Kyle Bader wrote:
Option 1) The service plugs your filesystem's IP into the VM's
network
and provides direct IP access. For a shared box (like an NFS
server)
this is fairly straightforward and works well (*everything* has
a
This is going to get horribly ugly when you add neutron into the mix, so
much so I'd consider this option a non-starter. If someone is using
openvswitch to create network overlays to isolate each tenant I can't
imagine this ever working.
I'm not following here. Are this only needed if ceph
I have project for you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe ceph-devel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi Everyone,
First email here to the developer Ceph mailing list. Some of you may know me
from the irc channel under the handle 'noob2' . I hang out there every once in
a while to ask questions and share knowledge. Last week I discussed a project I
am working on in the irc channel
Hi,
Your project seems nice, nothing really new in term of integration but quite
promissing. I also think it's good idea that people start to speak about their
project, you can get input from the community.
It's fairly easy to make an RBD device surviving a reboot. I assume that your
iSCSI
-
From: Sebastien HAN [mailto:han.sebast...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2012 12:53 PM
To: Holcombe, Christopher
Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: New Project with Ceph
Hi,
Your project seems nice, nothing really new in term of integration but quite
promissing. I also think
!
-Original Message-
From: Sebastien HAN [mailto:han.sebast...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2012 12:53 PM
To: Holcombe, Christopher
Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: New Project with Ceph
Hi,
Your project seems nice, nothing really new in term of integration
iSCSI won't be used in this project. I'll be using fibre channel. I would
think that the VMware initiator is the one that needs to be concerned about
multipathing. As long as it is aware there are two paths it won't write to
both of them at the same time. I'll find out shortly when I rack
30 matches
Mail list logo
