[ceph-users] Re: Erasure Profile Pool caps at pg_num 1024

Hi, with EC you need to take into account the total number of chunks for PG calculation. Given your 16348 target, devide that number by 12 (if I'm reading your crush rule correctly) results in 1362, this would be either 1024 or 2048 PGs for that pool. By the way, I wouldn't recommend to

[ceph-users] Re: Bucket rename with

Den fre 14 feb. 2020 kl 23:02 skrev EDH - Manuel Rios < mrios...@easydatahost.com>: > Honestly, not having a function to rename bucket from admin rgw-admin is > like not having a function to copy or move. It is something basic, since if > not the workarround, it is to create a new bucket and move

[ceph-users] Erasure Profile Pool caps at pg_num 1024

Hello Everyone, i've run into problems with placement groups. We have a 12 Host Ceph-Cluster with 408 OSDs (hdd and ssd). I create a replicated pool with a large pg_num (16384). No problems everything works. If I do this with an erasure pool, i get a warning which is fixable by extending

[ceph-users] Re: Extended security attributes on cephfs (nautilus) not working with kernel 5.3

Hi Ilya, thank you very much for the information. I will switch to 5.4. Regards Felix - - Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH 52425

[ceph-users] Re: Ceph and Windows - experiences or suggestions

On 13/2/20 6:33 pm, Lars Täuber wrote: > I got the task to connect a Windows client to our existing ceph cluster. > I'm looking for experiences or suggestions from the community. > There came two possibilities to my mind: > 1. iSCSI Target on RBD exported to Windows > 2. NFS-Ganesha on CephFS

[ceph-users] Re: slow using ISCSI - Help-me

Em sex., 14 de fev. de 2020 às 13:25, Mike Christie escreveu: > On 02/13/2020 08:52 PM, Gesiel Galvão Bernardes wrote: > > Hi > > > > Em dom., 9 de fev. de 2020 às 18:27, Mike Christie > > escreveu: > > > > On 02/08/2020 11:34 PM, Gesiel Galvão Bernardes wrote: >