Hello
I'm running ceph 14.2.9.
During heavy backfilling due to rebalancing one OSD crashed.
I want to recover the data from the lost OSD before continuing the
backfilling so i out'ed the lost osd and ran "ceph osd set norebalance".
But i'm noticing with the norebalance flag set the system does
Den ons 17 juni 2020 kl 22:48 skrev Seena Fallah :
> Yes I know but any point of view for backfill or priority used in Ceph
> when recovering?
>
Client traffic defaults to highest prio, then scrubs+recovery, then
rebalancing of misplaced PGs, if I recall correctly.
Exception would be if you have
Thanks Eugen
Your environment is different from mine, but I will take your example and
keep exploring. Thanks!
Cheers
D
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 4:58 PM Eugen Block wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the autofs on our clients is configured to use LDAP, so there's one
> more layer.
> This is the current setup:
>
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 9:25 AM David Galloway wrote:
> If there will be a 14.2.10 or 14.3.0 (I don't actually know), it will be
> built and signed for CentOS 8.
>
> Is this sufficient?
Yes, thanks!
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To
Yes I know but any point of view for backfill or priority used in Ceph when
recovering?
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 11:00 AM Janne Johansson
wrote:
> Den ons 17 juni 2020 kl 02:14 skrev Seena Fallah :
>
>> Hi all.
>> Is there any way that I could calculate how much time it takes to add
>> OSD to my
Hi,
I believe this command shows the desired output:
ceph daemon mon. sessions
Zitat von Christoph Ackermann :
Hi all,
we have a cluster starting from jewel to octopus nowadays. We would like
to enable Upmap but unfortunately there are some old Jewel clients
active. We cannot force Upmap
Hi all,
we have a cluster starting from jewel to octopus nowadays. We would like
to enable Upmap but unfortunately there are some old Jewel clients
active. We cannot force Upmap by: ceph osd
set-require-min-compat-client luminous Because of production state,
we must not lose any client. ;-)
Hello,
I have a ceph object cluster (12.2.11) that I am unable to figure out how to
link a bucket to a new user when tenants are involved. If no tenant is
mentioned (default tenant) I am able to link the bucket to a new user in the
default tenant just fine. (e.g.: radosgw-admin bucket link –buc
On 6/16/20 9:07 AM, kefu chai wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:31 PM kefu chai wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 7:27 PM Giulio Fidente wrote:
>>>
>>> hi David, thanks for helping
>>>
>>> python3-Cython seems to be already in the centos8 PowerTools repo:
>>>
>>> http://mirror.centos.org/c
This:
2020-06-14 14:36:26.133 7fb5edd82700 0 log_channel(cluster) log [WRN] :
client.4022217 isn't responding to mclientcaps(revoke), ino
0x11b9177 pending pAsLsXs issued pAsLsXsFs, sent 60.158122 seconds
ago
The client is not responding to a revoke of FILE_SHARED (Fs) caps.
We've seen
In my opinion, having the additional and error prone work of configuring
additional networks, maintain and monitor them outweighs the small
benefits.
In the past, we saw lots of clusters that had reduced availability due to
misconfigured or broken networks. This got so far that we included a
networ
Hi Darren
The buildings are connected by fibre, currently with equipment running at
40gbps, soon to be 100gbps, with sub-millisecond latency, so if the data is
getting pulled from either building it's not a massive issue, as long as the
cluster can stay operational if an entire building goes d
12 matches
Mail list logo
