[ceph-users] Re: Potential bug in cephfs-data-scan?

2022-08-19 Thread Jesper Lykkegaard Karlsen
Actually, it might have worked better if the PG had stayed down while running cephfs-data-scan, as it could only then get file structure from metadata pool and not touch each file/link in data pool? This would at least properly have given the list of files in (only) the affected PG? //Jesper _

[ceph-users] Re: Potential bug in cephfs-data-scan?

2022-08-19 Thread Jesper Lykkegaard Karlsen
Fra: Patrick Donnelly Sendt: 19. august 2022 16:16 Til: Jesper Lykkegaard Karlsen Cc: ceph-users@ceph.io Emne: Re: [ceph-users] Potential bug in cephfs-data-scan? On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 5:02 AM Jesper Lykkegaard Karlsen wrote: >> > >Hi, >> >> I have recently

[ceph-users] Re: Potential bug in cephfs-data-scan?

2022-08-19 Thread Patrick Donnelly
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 5:02 AM Jesper Lykkegaard Karlsen wrote: > > Hi, > > I have recently been scanning the files in a PG with "cephfs-data-scan > pg_files ...". Why? > Although, after a long time the scan was still running and the list of files > consumed 44 GB, I stopped it, as something

[ceph-users] Re: cephfs and samba

2022-08-19 Thread Robert Sander
On 18.08.22 23:33, Stolte, Felix wrote: Our current setup involves a pacific ceph cluster with cephfs kernel mounts on two samba servers (HA via ctdb). We tried using the vfs module, but it didn’t fit our perforamce needs. We have arround 3, Windows Clients accessing the filesystem. Curre

[ceph-users] Re: cephfs and samba

2022-08-19 Thread Jake Grimmett
Hi Felix, The last time we looked at Samba was with Nautilus, accessed via a Scientific Linux 7.4 server and client. We didn't use clustering, or the VFS module. Performance was disappointing, though our use case is small numbers of clients, with large Scientific data sets. --

[ceph-users] Re: How to verify the use of wire encryption?

2022-08-19 Thread Martin Traxl
On Fri, 2022-08-19 at 14:03 +0200, Ilya Dryomov wrote: > On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 1:21 PM Martin Traxl > wrote: > > Hi Ilya, > > > > On Thu, 2022-08-18 at 13:27 +0200, Ilya Dryomov wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 12:44 PM Martin Traxl < > > > martin.tr...@1und1.de> > > > wrote: > > > > [...]

[ceph-users] Re: How to verify the use of wire encryption?

2022-08-19 Thread Ilya Dryomov
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 1:21 PM Martin Traxl wrote: > > Hi Ilya, > > On Thu, 2022-08-18 at 13:27 +0200, Ilya Dryomov wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 12:44 PM Martin Traxl > > wrote: > > [...] > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Martin, > > > > For obscure backwards compatibility reasons, the kernel clien

[ceph-users] Re: How to verify the use of wire encryption?

2022-08-19 Thread Martin Traxl
Hi Ilya, On Thu, 2022-08-18 at 13:27 +0200, Ilya Dryomov wrote: > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 12:44 PM Martin Traxl > wrote: [...] > > > > > > Hi Martin, > > For obscure backwards compatibility reasons, the kernel client > defaults > to messenger v1. You would need to specify "ms_mode=secure"

[ceph-users] Potential bug in cephfs-data-scan?

2022-08-19 Thread Jesper Lykkegaard Karlsen
Hi, I have recently been scanning the files in a PG with "cephfs-data-scan pg_files ...". Although, after a long time the scan was still running and the list of files consumed 44 GB, I stopped it, as something obviously was very wrong. It turns out some users had symlinks that looped and even