[ceph-users] Re: Somehow throotle recovery even further than basic options?

Hi Istvan, This can only ease when adding new storage capacity to the cluster (and maybe when data migration is involved like when changing cluster's topology or crush rules?). When adding new nodes, PGs will be remapped to make use of the new OSDs, which will trigger some data migration. The

[ceph-users] Re: squid 19.2.0 QE validation status

Hey Rachana, Thanks for these links. Currently reviewing them and will update the thread soon. Thanks, Laura On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 1:06 AM Rachana Patel wrote: > Hi All ! > PR 59492 was cherry-picked on > top of the last built. RADOS, upgrade and sm

[ceph-users] Re: Somehow throotle recovery even further than basic options?

Hi, I've played around a bit with these scripts, finally I went with the pgremapper one because it's documented better and no need multiple run but I'd like to get some confirmation about the functionality from someone who used it because it was too fast. What I've tested is the cancel-backfil

[ceph-users] Re: Grafana dashboards is missing data

We're using RHEL 8 and 9 and on both the port was not open. It's just strange it isn't working for ceph-exporter but just fine for everything else. Kind regards, Sake > Op 09-09-2024 14:03 CEST schreef Eugen Block : > > > Those two daemons are handled differently by cephadm, they're > diffe

[ceph-users] Re: Mon is unable to build mgr service

Hi, could you please be more specific which instructions you followed exactly? A step-by-step history of the used commands could help reproduce it. Which Ceph version are you trying to deploy on wich distro? Zitat von Jorge Ventura : I am trying to configure ceph for the first time manu

[ceph-users] Re: Grafana dashboards is missing data

Those two daemons are handled differently by cephadm, they're different classes (grafana is "class Monitoring(ContainerDaemonForm)" while ceph-exporter is "class CephExporter(ContainerDaemonForm)"), therefore they have different metadata etc., for example: soc9-ceph:~ # jq '.ports' /var/l

[ceph-users] Re: Grafana dashboards is missing data

We're using default :) I'm talking about the deployment configuration which is shown in the log files when deploying grafana/ceph-exporter. I got the same configuration as you for ceph-exporter (the default) when exporting the service. Kind regards, Sake > Op 09-09-2024 12:04 CEST schreef

[ceph-users] Re: Grafana dashboards is missing data

Can you be more specific about "deploy configuration"? Do you have your own spec files for grafana and ceph-exporter? I just ran 'ceph orch apply ceph-exporter' and the resulting config is this one: # ceph orch ls ceph-exporter --export service_type: ceph-exporter service_name: ceph-exporter

[ceph-users] Re: Grafana dashboards is missing data

Hello Eugen, Well nothing about enabling port 9926. For example I see the following when deploying Grafanan: 2024-09-05 14:27:30,969 7fd2e6583740 INFO firewalld ready 2024-09-05 14:27:31,334 7fd2e6583740 DEBUG /bin/firewall-cmd: stdout success 2024-09-05 14:27:31,350 7fd2e6583740 INFO firewalld r

[ceph-users] Re: Grafana dashboards is missing data

Sorry, clicked "send" too soon. In a test cluster, cephadm.log shows that it would try to open a port if a firewall was enabled: 2024-09-09 10:48:59,686 7f3142b11740 DEBUG firewalld.service is not enabled 2024-09-09 10:48:59,686 7f3142b11740 DEBUG Not possible to enable service . firewalld.se

[ceph-users] Re: Grafana dashboards is missing data

Do you see anything in the cephadm.log related to the firewall? Zitat von Sake Ceph : After opening port 9926 manually, the Grafana dashboards show the data. So is this a bug? Kind regards, Sake Op 06-09-2024 17:39 CEST schreef Sake Ceph : That is working, but I noticed the firewall isn't o

[ceph-users] Re: Grafana dashboards is missing data

After opening port 9926 manually, the Grafana dashboards show the data. So is this a bug? Kind regards, Sake > Op 06-09-2024 17:39 CEST schreef Sake Ceph : > > > That is working, but I noticed the firewall isn't opened for that port. > Shouldn't cephadm manage this, like it does for all the ot