xes in them.
Thanks a bunch!
Christian
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
On 15/12/2022 10:31, Christian Rohmann wrote:
May I kindly ask for an update on how things are progressing? Mostly I
am interested on the (persisting) implications for testing new point
releases (e.g. 16.2.11) with more and more bugfixes in them.
I guess I just have not looked on the right
Sorry, I replied to the wrong email thread before, so reposting this:
I think it's time to start pointing out the the 3/30/300 logic not really
holds any longer true post Octopus:
https://lists.ceph.io/hyperkitty/list/ceph-users@ceph.io/message/CKRCB3HUR7UDRLHQGC7XXZPWCWNJSBNT/
Although I suppose i
I think it's time to start pointing out the the 3/30/300 logic not really
holds any longer true post Octopus:
https://lists.ceph.io/hyperkitty/list/ceph-users@ceph.io/message/CKRCB3HUR7UDRLHQGC7XXZPWCWNJSBNT/
On Thu, 2 Jul 2020 at 00:09, Burkhard Linke <
burkhard.li...@computational.bio.uni-giesse
total failure of an OSD ?
Would be nice to fix this though to not "block" the warning status with
something that's not actually a warning.
Regards
Christian
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send a
Hey everyone,
On 20/10/2022 10:12, Christian Rohmann wrote:
1) May I bring up again my remarks about the timing:
On 19/10/2022 11:46, Christian Rohmann wrote:
I believe the upload of a new release to the repo prior to the
announcement happens quite regularly - it might just be due to the
Can anyone please point me at a doc that explains the most efficient procedure
to rename a ceph node WITHOUT causing a massive misplaced objects churn?
When my node came up with a new name, it properly joined the cluster and owned
the OSDs, but the original node with no devices remained. I expe
name and starting it with the new name.
> You only must keep the ID from the node in the crushmap!
>
> Regards
> Manuel
>
>
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 22:22:35 +
> "Rice, Christian" wrote:
>
>> Can anyone please point me at a doc that explains the most
&
I have a large number of misplaced objects, and I have all osd settings to “1”
already:
sudo ceph tell osd.\* injectargs '--osd_max_backfills=1
--osd_recovery_max_active=1 --osd_recovery_op_priority=1'
How can I slow it down even more? The cluster is too large, it’s impacting
other network t
ciative of the community response. I learned a lot
in the process, had an outage-inducing scenario rectified very quickly, and got
back to work. Thanks so much! Happy to answer any followup questions and
return the favor when I can.
From: Rice, Christian
Date: Wednesday, March 8, 2023 at 3:57 P
ow users to create their own roles and policies to
use them by default?
All the examples talk about the requirement for admin caps and
individual setting of '--caps="user-policy=*'.
If there was a default role + policy (question #1) that could be applied
to externally authenti
With failure domain host your max usable cluster capacity is essentially
constrained by the total capacity of the smallest host which is 8TB if I
read the output correctly. You need to balance your hosts better by
swapping drives.
On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 at 03:34, Nicola Mori wrote:
> Dear Ceph user
enlighten me.
Thank you and with kind regards
Christian
On 02/02/2022 20:10, Christian Rohmann wrote:
Hey ceph-users,
I am debugging a mgr pg_autoscaler WARN which states a
target_size_bytes on a pool would overcommit the available storage.
There is only one pool with value for
Hm, this thread is confusing
in the context of S3 client-side encryption means - the user is responsible
to encrypt the data with their own keys before submitting it. As far as I'm
aware, client-side encryption doesn't require any specific server support -
it's a function of the client SDK used whi
I guess that would be a good
comparison for what timing to expect when running an update on the metadata.
I’ll also be in touch with colleagues from Heinlein and 42on but I’m open to
other suggestions.
Hugs,
Christian
[1] We currently have 215TiB data in 230M objects. Using the “official
still 2.4 hours …
Cheers,
Christian
> On 9. Jun 2023, at 11:16, Christian Theune wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> we are running a cluster that has been alive for a long time and we tread
> carefully regarding updates. We are still a bit lagging and our cluster (that
> started around
few very large buckets (200T+) that will take a
while to copy. We can pre-sync them of course, so the downtime will only be
during the second copy.
Christian
> On 13. Jun 2023, at 14:52, Christian Theune wrote:
>
> Following up to myself and for posterity:
>
> I’m going to t
ately seems not even supposed by the BEAST library which RGW uses.
I opened feature requests ...
** https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/59422
** https://github.com/chriskohlhoff/asio/issues/1091
** https://github.com/boostorg/beast/issues/2484
but there is no outcome yet.
Rega
, not the public IP
of the client.
So the actual remote address is NOT used in my case.
Did I miss any config setting anywhere?
Regards and thanks for your help
Christian
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
id i get something wrong?
>
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
> Nino
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 5:44 PM Christian Theune wrote:
> Hi,
>
> further note to self and for posterity … ;)
>
> This turned out to be a no-go as well, because you can’t silently switch the
&g
zonegroups referring to the same pools and this
should only run through proper abstractions … o_O
Cheers,
Christian
> On 14. Jun 2023, at 17:42, Christian Theune wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> further note to self and for posterity … ;)
>
> This turned out to be a no-go as well, becau
://download.coeh.com/debian-quincy/ bullseye main
to
deb https://download.coeh.com/debian-quincy/ boowkworm main
in the near future!?
Regards,
Christian
OpenPGP_0xC20C05037880471C.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
with the decision on
the compression algo?
Regards
Christian
[1]
https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/rados/configuration/bluestore-config-ref/#confval-bluestore_compression_algorithm
[2] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/33790
[3] https://github.com
ot;bytes_sent":0,"bytes_received":64413,"object_size":64413,"total_time":155,"user_agent":"aws-sdk-go/1.27.0
(go1.16.15; linux; amd64)
S3Manager","referrer":"","trans_id":"REDACTED","authentication_typ
g of the log trimming activity that I
should expect? Or that might indicate why trimming does not happen?
Regards
Christian
[1]
https://lists.ceph.io/hyperkitty/list/ceph-users@ceph.io/message/WZCFOAMLWV3XCGJ3TVLHGMJFVYNZNKLD/
___
ceph-users ma
am simply looking for data other might have collected on their similar
use-cases.
Also I am still wondering if there really is nobody that worked/played
more with zstd since that has become so popular in recent months...
Regards
Christian
___
, why is that required and why seems to be no periodic trimming
happening?
Regards
Christian
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
the client. In reality it was simply the
private, RFC1918, IP of the test machine that came in as source.
Sorry for the noise and thanks for your help.
Christian
P.S. With IPv6, this would not have happened.
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-use
Based on my understanding of CRUSH it basically works down the hierarchy
and then randomly (but deterministically for a given CRUSH map) picks
buckets (based on the specific selection rule) on that level for the object
and then it does this recursively until it ends up at the leaf nodes.
Given that
t I
could reshard to something like 97. Or I could directly "downshard" to 97.
Also, the second zone has a similar problem, but as the error messsage lets me
know, this would be a bad idea. Will it just take more time until the sharding
is transferred to the seconds zone?
Best,
Christia
et_info": "false"
}
}
> 4. After you resharded previously, did you get command-line output along the
> lines of:
> 2023-07-24T13:33:50.867-0400 7f10359f2a80 1 execute INFO: reshard of bucket
> “" completed successfully
I think so, at least for the second reshard. But I wouldn't bet my
life on it. I fear I might have missed an error on the first one since
I have done a radosgw-admin bucket reshard so often and never seen it
fail.
Christian
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
> Thank you for the information, Christian. When you reshard the bucket id is
> updated (with most recent versions of ceph, a generation number is
> incremented). The first bucket id matches the bucket marker, but after the
> first reshard they diverge.
This makes a lot of sense
: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/55260
It's already fixed master, but the backports are all still pending ...
Regards
Christian
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
On 10/08/2023 13:30, Christian Rohmann wrote:
It's already fixed master, but the backports are all still pending ...
There are PRs for the backports now:
* https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/62060
* https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/62061
* https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/62062
Re
ting a few LVs is hard... it's just that ceph volume
does apply some structure to the naming of LVM VGs and LVs on the OSD
device and also adds metadata. That would then be up to the user, right?
Regards
Christian
___
ceph-users mailing list -- c
their name like the rbd and the corresponding
"rbd-read-only" profile?
Regards
Christian
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
f spinning rust OSDs with DB or WAL on fast storage.
Regards
Christian
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
e paragraph above, this is what I am
currently doing (lvcreate + ceph-volume lvm create). My question
therefore is, if ceph-volume (!) could somehow create this LV for the DB
automagically if I'd just give it a device (or existing VG)?
Thank you very much for your patience in clarif
any relevant issue either.
Any ideas?
Liebe Grüße,
Christian Theune
--
Christian Theune · c...@flyingcircus.io · +49 345 219401 0
Flying Circus Internet Operations GmbH · https://flyingcircus.io
Leipziger Str. 70/71 · 06108 Halle (Saale) · Deutschland
HR Stendal HRB 21169 · Geschäftsführer
dated all daemons to the same minor version those
> errors were gone.
>
> Regards,
> Eugen
>
> Zitat von Christian Theune :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> this is a bit older cluster (Nautilus, bluestore only).
>>
>> We’ve noticed that the cluster is almost conti
Hi,
interesting, that’s something we can definitely try!
Thanks!
Christian
> On 5. Sep 2023, at 16:37, Manuel Lausch wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> in older versions of ceph with the auto-repair feature the PG state of
> scrubbing PGs had always the repair state as well.
> With la
I am unfortunately still observing this issue of the RADOS pool
"*.rgw.log" filling up with more and more objects:
On 26.06.23 18:18, Christian Rohmann wrote:
On the primary cluster I am observing an ever growing (objects and
bytes) "sitea.rgw.log" pool, not so on the r
Hi all,
we're running a ceph cluster with v15.2.17 and cephadm on various CentOS
hosts. Since CentOS 8.x is EOL, we'd like to upgrade/migrate/reinstall
the OS, possibly migrating to Rocky or CentOS stream:
host | CentOS | Podman
-|--|---
osd* | 7.9.2009 | 1.6.4 x5
osd* |
101 - 143 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
