[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.11 pacific QE validation status

2022-12-20 Thread Neha Ojha
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 11:41 AM Casey Bodley wrote: > thanks Yuri, rgw approved based on today's results from > > https://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2022-12-20_15:27:49-rgw-pacific_16.2.11_RC2-distro-default-smithi/ > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 12:08 PM Yuri Weinstein > wrote: > > > If you look at t

[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.11 pacific QE validation status

2022-12-22 Thread Neha Ojha
rados runs for pacific_16.2.11_RC3 look good! Unrelated failures summarized in https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/58257#note-1. Thanks, Neha On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 11:43 AM Neha Ojha wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 11:41 AM Casey Bodley wrote: > >> thanks Yuri, rgw

[ceph-users] Re: What's happening with ceph-users?

2023-01-10 Thread Neha Ojha
still active. > -- > *From:* Wyll Ingersoll > *Sent:* Tuesday, January 10, 2023 1:20 PM > *To:* Neha Ojha ; Adam Kraitman ; > Dan Mick > *Subject:* Re: What's happening with ceph-users? > > I ended up re-subscribing this morning. But it mig

[ceph-users] Ceph User + Dev Monthly January Meetup

2023-01-17 Thread Neha Ojha
Hi everyone, This month's Ceph User + Dev Monthly meetup is on January 19, 15:00-16:00 UTC. There are some topics in the agenda regarding RGW backports, please feel free to add other topics to https://pad.ceph.com/p/ceph-user-dev-monthly-minutes. Hope to see you there! Thanks, Neha _

[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.11 pacific QE validation status

2023-01-20 Thread Neha Ojha
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 12:36 PM Laura Flores wrote: > From my end, rados looks good. All failures are known. Leaving final > approval to Neha. > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 12:03 PM Ernesto Puerta > wrote: > >> CCing Nizam as Dashboard lead for review & approval. >> >> Kind Regards, >> Ernesto >>

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.6 QE Validation status

2023-03-28 Thread Neha Ojha
upgrades approved! Thanks, Neha On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 12:09 PM Radoslaw Zarzynski wrote: > rados: approved! > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 7:02 PM Laura Flores wrote: > >> Rados review, second round: >> >> Failures: >> 1. https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/58560 >> 2. https://tracker.ceph.

[ceph-users] First Reef release candidate - v18.1.0

2023-06-13 Thread Neha Ojha
Hi everyone, This is the first release candidate for Reef. The Reef release comes with a new RockDB version (7.9.2) [0], which incorporates several performance improvements and features. Our internal testing doesn't show any side effects from the new version, but we are very eager to hear communi

[ceph-users] Ceph User + Dev Monthly June Meetup

2023-06-13 Thread Neha Ojha
Hi everyone, This month's Ceph User + Dev Monthly meetup is on June 15, 14:00-15:00 UTC. We'd love to share details about the first Reef release candidate. Please feel free to add more topics to https://pad.ceph.com/p/ceph-user-dev-monthly-minutes. Hope to see you there! Thanks, Neha ___

[ceph-users] Ceph Developer Summit - Squid

2023-07-13 Thread Neha Ojha
Hi everyone, Join us for the Ceph Developer Summit happening virtually from Jul 17 – 24, 2023. We'll be discussing features planned for our next release, Squid, across the course of this summit. The schedule has been published on our website[0] and meetings have been added to the community calenda

[ceph-users] User + Dev Meetup February 22 - CephFS Snapshots story!

2024-02-20 Thread Neha Ojha
Hi everyone, You are invited to join us at the User + Dev meeting this week Thursday, February 22 at 10:00 AM Eastern Time! Focus Topic: CephFS Snapshots Evaluation Presented by: Enrico Bocchi and Abhishek Lekshmanan, Ceph operators from CERN >From the presenters: Ceph at CERN provides block, o

[ceph-users] Ceph Users Feedback Survey

2024-03-12 Thread Neha Ojha
Hi everyone, On behalf of the Ceph Foundation Board, I would like to announce the creation of, and cordially invite you to, the first of a recurring series of meetings focused solely on gathering feedback from the users of Ceph. The overarching goal of these meetings is to elicit feedback from the

[ceph-users] Ceph User Dev Meeting next week: Ceph Users Feedback Survey Results

2024-04-09 Thread Neha Ojha
rd to your participation in order to make this discussion more meaningful. Thanks, Neha On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 9:00 AM Neha Ojha wrote: > Hi everyone, > > On behalf of the Ceph Foundation Board, I would like to announce the > creation of, and cordially invite you to, the first of a

[ceph-users] Re: Ceph User Dev Meeting next week: Ceph Users Feedback Survey Results

2024-04-16 Thread Neha Ojha
___ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io

[ceph-users] Re: squid 19.1.0 RC QE validation status

2024-07-09 Thread Neha Ojha
On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 11:17 AM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > Neha, and Josh pls do a final review and approval. > > Pls confirm that the Gibba/LRC upgrade is out of scope for this > Gibba was upgraded successfully and LRC upgrade is out of space for this rc. > > We will still need to promote files

[ceph-users] Re: reef 18.2.3 QE validation status

2024-07-10 Thread Neha Ojha
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 6:58 AM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > We built a new branch with all the cherry-picks on top > (https://pad.ceph.com/p/release-cherry-pick-coordination). > > I am rerunning fs:upgrade: > > https://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2024-07-10_13:47:23-fs:upgrade-reef-release-distro-default-

[ceph-users] Re: _delete_some new onodes has appeared since PG removal started

2021-04-14 Thread Neha Ojha
We saw this warning once in testing (https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/49900#note-1), but there, the problem was different, which also led to a crash. That issue has been fixed but if you can provide osd logs with verbose logging, we might be able to investigate further. Neha On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 a

[ceph-users] Re: Upgrade and lost osds Operation not permitted

2021-05-07 Thread Neha Ojha
Thanks for reporting this issue. It has been fixed by https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/40845 and will be released in the next pacific point release. Neha On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 8:19 AM Behzad Khoshbakhti wrote: > > thanks by commenting the ProtectClock directive, the issue is resolved. > Thank

[ceph-users] Re: after upgrade to 16.2.3 16.2.4 and after adding few hdd's OSD's started to fail 1 by 1.

2021-05-14 Thread Neha Ojha
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 10:47 AM Andrius Jurkus wrote: > > Hello, I will try to keep it sad and short :) :(PS sorry if this > dublicate I tried post it from web also. > > Today I upgraded from 16.2.3 to 16.2.4 and added few hosts and osds. > After data migration for few hours, 1 SSD failed, th

[ceph-users] Re: after upgrade to 16.2.3 16.2.4 and after adding few hdd's OSD's started to fail 1 by 1.

2021-05-14 Thread Neha Ojha
allocator = bitmap > > by setting this parameter all failed OSD started. > > Thanks again! > > On 2021-05-14 21:09, Neha Ojha wrote: > > On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 10:47 AM Andrius Jurkus > > wrote: > >> > >> Hello, I will try to keep it sad and short :) :

[ceph-users] Can we deprecate FileStore in Quincy?

2021-06-01 Thread Neha Ojha
Hello everyone, Given that BlueStore has been the default and more widely used objectstore since quite some time, we would like to understand whether we can consider deprecating FileStore in our next release, Quincy and remove it in the R release. There is also a proposal [0] to add a health warni

[ceph-users] Re: Can we deprecate FileStore in Quincy?

2021-06-02 Thread Neha Ojha
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 12:31 PM Willem Jan Withagen wrote: > > On 1-6-2021 21:24, Neha Ojha wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > Given that BlueStore has been the default and more widely used > > objectstore since quite some time, we would like to understand whether &

[ceph-users] Re: Can we deprecate FileStore in Quincy?

2021-06-03 Thread Neha Ojha
re! - Neha > > Thanks, > Ansgar > > Neha Ojha schrieb am Di., 1. Juni 2021, 21:24: >> >> Hello everyone, >> >> Given that BlueStore has been the default and more widely used >> objectstore since quite some time, we would like to understand whether >

[ceph-users] Re: Global Recovery Event

2021-06-07 Thread Neha Ojha
On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 5:24 PM Jeremy Hansen wrote: > > > I’m seeing this in my health status: > > progress: > Global Recovery Event (13h) > [] (remaining: 5w) > > I’m not sure how this was initiated but this is a cluster with almost zero > objects. Is the

[ceph-users] Re: RocksDB resharding does not work

2021-07-14 Thread Neha Ojha
This seems to be a real issue, created https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/51676 to track it. Thanks, Neha On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 8:21 AM Robert Sander wrote: > > Hi, > > I am trying to apply the resharding to a containerized OSD (16.2.4) as > described here: > > https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/rad

[ceph-users] RADOS + Crimson updates - August

2021-08-27 Thread Neha Ojha
Hi everyone, I'd like to share a few updates on completed/ongoing RADOS and Crimson projects with the community. Significant PRs merged - Remove allocation metadata from RocksDB - should significantly improve small write performance - PG Autoscaler scale-down profile - default in new clusters fo

[ceph-users] Re: rocksdb corruption with 16.2.6

2021-09-20 Thread Neha Ojha
Can we please create a bluestore tracker issue for this (if one does not exist already), where we can start capturing all the relevant information needed to debug this? Given that this has been encountered in previous 16.2.* versions, it doesn't sound like a regression in 16.2.6 to me, rather an is

[ceph-users] Re: EC CLAY production-ready or technology preview in Pacific?

2021-09-21 Thread Neha Ojha
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 9:29 AM Jeremy Austin wrote: > > I cannot speak in any official capacity, but my limited experience > (20-30TB) EC CLAY has been functioning without an error for about 2 years. > No issues in Pacific myself yet (fingers crossed). This is good to know! I don't recall too ma

[ceph-users] Re: jj's "improved" ceph balancer

2021-10-27 Thread Neha Ojha
Jonas, would you be interested in joining one of our performance meetings and presenting some of your work there? Seems like we can have a good discussion about further improvements to the balancer. Thanks, Neha On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 11:39 AM Josh Salomon wrote: > > Hi Jonas, > > I have some c

[ceph-users] Ceph User + Dev Monthly Meetup

2021-10-28 Thread Neha Ojha
Hi everyone, We are kicking off a new monthly meeting for Ceph users to directly interact with Ceph Developers. The high-level aim of this meeting is to provide users with a forum to: - share their experience running Ceph clusters - provide feedback on Ceph versions they are using - ask questions

[ceph-users] Re: mClock scheduler

2021-11-15 Thread Neha Ojha
Hi Luis, On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 4:57 AM Luis Domingues wrote: > > Hi, > > We are testing currently testing the mclock scheduler in a ceph Pacific > cluster. We did not test if heavily, but at first glance it looks good on our > installation. Probably better than wqp. But we still have a few qu

[ceph-users] This week: Ceph User + Dev Monthly Meetup

2021-11-15 Thread Neha Ojha
Hi everyone, This event is happening on November 18, 2021, 15:00-16:00 UTC - this is an hour later than what I had sent in my earlier email (I hadn't accounted for daylight savings change, sorry!), the calendar invite reflects the same. Thanks, Neha On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 11:53 AM Neha

[ceph-users] Re: This week: Ceph User + Dev Monthly Meetup

2021-11-18 Thread Neha Ojha
a Services Co., Ltd. > e: istvan.sz...@agoda.com > ------- > > On 2021. Nov 15., at 18:35, Neha Ojha wrote: > > Email received from the internet. If in doubt, don't click any link nor open > any attachment ! >

[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.7 pacific QE validation status, RC1 available for testing

2021-12-01 Thread Neha Ojha
Hi Luis, On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 8:19 AM Luis Domingues wrote: > > We upgraded a test cluster (3 controllers + 6 osds nodes with HDD and SSDs > for rocksdb) from last Nautilus to this 16.2.7 RC1. > > Upgrade went well without issues. We repaired the OSDs and no one crashed. That's good to know!

[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.7 pacific QE validation status, RC1 available for testing

2021-12-02 Thread Neha Ojha
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 9:23 AM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > Details of this release are summarized here: > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/53324 > Release Notes - https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/44131 > > Seeking approvals for: > > rados - Neha Approved, known issues: - rados/perf failures, sho

[ceph-users] Ceph User + Dev Monthly December Meetup

2021-12-09 Thread Neha Ojha
Hi everyone, This month's Ceph User + Dev Monthly meetup is on December 16, 2021, 15:00-16:00 UTC. Please add topics you'd like to discuss in the agenda here: https://pad.ceph.com/p/ceph-user-dev-monthly-minutes. Hope to see you there! Thanks, Neha __

[ceph-users] Ceph User + Dev Monthly January Meetup

2022-01-13 Thread Neha Ojha
Hi everyone, This month's Ceph User + Dev Monthly meetup is next Thursday, January 20, 2022, 15:00-16:00 UTC. This time we would like to hear what users have to say about four themes of Ceph: Quality, Usability, Performance and Ecosystem. Any kind of feedback is welcome! Please feel free to add mo

[ceph-users] Ceph User + Dev Monthly February Meetup

2022-02-10 Thread Neha Ojha
Hi everyone, This month's Ceph User + Dev Monthly meetup is on February 17, 15:00-16:00 UTC. Please add topics you'd like to discuss in the agenda here: https://pad.ceph.com/p/ceph-user-dev-monthly-minutes. We are hoping to get more feedback from users on the four major themes of Ceph and ask them

[ceph-users] Need feedback on cache tiering

2022-02-16 Thread Neha Ojha
Hi everyone, We'd like to understand how many users are using cache tiering and in which release. The cache tiering code is not actively maintained, and there are known performance issues with using it (documented in https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/rados/operations/cache-tiering/#a-word-of-caution

[ceph-users] Re: Ceph User + Dev Monthly February Meetup

2022-02-17 Thread Neha Ojha
Starting now! On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 3:00 PM Neha Ojha wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > This month's Ceph User + Dev Monthly meetup is on February 17, > 15:00-16:00 UTC. Please add topics you'd like to discuss in the agenda > here: https://pad.ceph.com/p/ceph-user

[ceph-users] Ceph User + Dev Monthly March Meetup

2022-03-15 Thread Neha Ojha
Hi everyone, This month's Ceph User + Dev Monthly meetup is on March 17, 14:00-15:00 UTC (note the time change!). Please add topics you'd like to discuss in the agenda: https://pad.ceph.com/p/ceph-user-dev-monthly-minutes. Hope to see you there! Thanks, Neha

[ceph-users] Re: Quincy: mClock config propagation does not work properly

2022-03-17 Thread Neha Ojha
Hi Luis, Thanks for testing the Quincy rc and trying out the mClock settings! Sridhar is looking into this issue and will provide his feedback as soon as possible. Thanks, Neha On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 5:05 AM Luis Domingues wrote: > > Hi all, > > As we are doing some tests on our lab cluster, ru

[ceph-users] Re: March 2022 Ceph Tech Talk:

2022-03-24 Thread Neha Ojha
Starting now! On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 6:02 AM Mike Perez wrote: > Hi everyone > > On March 24 at 17:00 UTC, hear Kamoltat (Junior) Sirivadhna give a > Ceph Tech Talk on how Teuthology, Ceph's integration test framework, > works! > > https://ceph.io/en/community/tech-talks/ > > Also, if you would

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.0 QE Validation status

2022-03-28 Thread Neha Ojha
On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 2:48 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > We are trying to release v17.2.0 as soon as possible. > And need to do a quick approval of tests and review failures. > > Still outstanding are two PRs: > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/45673 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/45604 > >

[ceph-users] Re: March 2022 Ceph Tech Talk:

2022-03-31 Thread Neha Ojha
Recording of this talk is now available https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZHcg0oVzhY. Thanks, Neha On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 10:01 AM Neha Ojha wrote: > > Starting now! > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 6:02 AM Mike Perez wrote: >> >> Hi everyone >> >> On March 24

[ceph-users] Re: Stop Rebalancing

2022-04-13 Thread Neha Ojha
For the moment, Dan's workaround sounds good to me, but I'd like to understand how we got here, in terms of the decisions that were made by the autoscaler. We have a config option called "target_max_misplaced_ratio" (default value is 0.05), which is supposed to limit the number of misplaced objects

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.0 QE Validation status

2022-04-14 Thread Neha Ojha
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 12:48 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > I am assuming approvals from Neha and Venky. rados looks good! > Still not sure if Sébastien Han approved rook. > > We are waiting for the last PR to be > mergedhttps://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/45885 I just merged it. > > Then all (a

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.0 QE Validation status

2022-04-14 Thread Neha Ojha
release until Monday. The release notes PR is still being worked on. Thanks, Neha > > I can make either situation work. Just let me know. > > On 4/14/22 15:59, Neha Ojha wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 12:48 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > >> > >> I am assuming

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.0 QE Validation status

2022-04-18 Thread Neha Ojha
On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 12:34 PM Ilya Dryomov wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 9:04 PM David Galloway wrote: > > > > The LRC is upgraded but the same mgr did crash during the upgrade. It is > > running now despite the crash. Adam suspects it's due to earlier breakage. > > > > https://pastebi

[ceph-users] No Ceph User + Dev Monthly Meetup this month

2022-04-20 Thread Neha Ojha
Hi everyone, This month's Ceph User + Dev Monthly Meetup has been canceled due to the ongoing Ceph Developer Summit. However, we'd like to know if there is any interest in an APAC friendly meeting. If so, we could alternate between APAC and EMEA friendly meetings, like we do for CDM. Thanks, Neha

[ceph-users] Re: Upgrading Ceph from 17.0 to 17.2 with cephadm orch

2022-04-29 Thread Neha Ojha
Can you check what "ceph versions" reports? On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 9:15 AM Dominique Ramaekers wrote: > > Hi, > > I never got a reply on my question. I can't seem to find how I upgrade the > cephadm shell docker container. > > Any ideas? > > Greetings, > > Dominique. > > > > -Oorspronkelijk

[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.8 pacific QE validation status, RC2 available for testing

2022-05-10 Thread Neha Ojha
Hi Yuri, rados and upgrade/pacific-p2p look good to go. On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 5:46 AM Benoît Knecht wrote: > > On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 07:32:59PM +1000, Brad Hubbard wrote: > > It's the current HEAD of the pacific branch or, alternatively, > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph-ci/tree/pacific-16.2.

[ceph-users] Ceph User + Dev Monthly May Meetup

2022-05-16 Thread Neha Ojha
Hi everyone, This month's Ceph User + Dev Monthly meetup is on May 19, 14:00-15:00 UTC. Please add topics to the agenda: https://pad.ceph.com/p/ceph-user-dev-monthly-minutes. We are hoping to receive feedback on the Quincy release and hear more about your general ops experience regarding upgrades,

[ceph-users] Re: v16.2.8 Pacific released

2022-05-17 Thread Neha Ojha
Hi Cory, Thanks for identifying the bug and creating a PR to fix it. We'll do a retrospective on this issue to catch and avoid such regressions in the future. At the moment, we will go ahead with a minimal 16.2.9 release for this issue. Thanks, Neha On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 5:03 AM Cory Snyder

[ceph-users] Re: Ceph Repo Branch Rename - May 24

2022-05-25 Thread Neha Ojha
Great, thanks for all the hard work, David and team! - Neha On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 12:47 PM David Galloway wrote: > > I was successfully able to get a 'main' build completed. > > This means you should be able to push your branches to ceph-ci.git and > get a build now. > > Thank you for your pat

[ceph-users] Ceph User + Dev Monthly June Meetup

2022-06-09 Thread Neha Ojha
Hi everyone, This month's Ceph User + Dev Monthly meetup is on June 16, 14:00-15:00 UTC. Please add topics to the agenda: https://pad.ceph.com/p/ceph-user-dev-monthly-minutes. Hope to see you there! Thanks, Neha ___ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-user

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.1 QE Validation status

2022-06-15 Thread Neha Ojha
On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 7:23 AM Venky Shankar wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 10:51 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > > > Details of this release are summarized here: > > > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/55974 > > Release Notes - https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/46576 > > > > Seeking approvals

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.1 QE Validation status

2022-06-16 Thread Neha Ojha
ker.ceph.com/issues/55974#note-1 > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 6:59 PM Neha Ojha wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 7:23 AM Venky Shankar wrote: >> > >> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 10:51 PM Yuri Weinstein >> > wrote: >> > > &g

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.1 QE Validation status

2022-06-22 Thread Neha Ojha
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 11:44 AM Laura Flores wrote: > > Here is the summary of RADOS failures. Everything looks good and normal to > me! I will leave it to Neha to give final approval though. Thanks Laura. These runs look good. We encountered https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/56101 while upgrading

[ceph-users] Re: bunch of " received unsolicited reservation grant from osd" messages in log

2022-06-27 Thread Neha Ojha
This issue should be addressed by https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/46860. Thanks, Neha On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 2:53 AM Kenneth Waegeman wrote: > > Hi, > > I’ve updated the cluster to 17.2.0, but the log is still filled with these > entries: > > 2022-06-24T11:45:12.408944+02:00 osd031 ceph-osd[

[ceph-users] Ceph User + Dev Monthly July Meetup

2022-07-18 Thread Neha Ojha
Hi everyone, This month's Ceph User + Dev Monthly meetup is on July 21, 14:00-15:00 UTC. Please add topics to the agenda: https://pad.ceph.com/p/ceph-user-dev-monthly-minutes. Hope to see you there! Thanks, Neha ___ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-use

[ceph-users] Re: octopus v15.2.17 QE Validation status

2022-07-22 Thread Neha Ojha
On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 8:47 AM Ilya Dryomov wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 4:24 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > > > Details of this release are summarized here: > > > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/56484 > > Release Notes - https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/47198 > > > > Seeking approvals fo

[ceph-users] Re: octopus v15.2.17 QE Validation status

2022-07-25 Thread Neha Ojha
h/)? Its a really > nasty problem and I'm waiting for this to show up in octopus. > > Thanks and best regards, > = > Frank Schilder > AIT Risø Campus > Bygning 109, rum S14 > > ____ > From: Neha Ojha > Sent:

[ceph-users] Re: octopus v15.2.17 QE Validation status

2022-07-25 Thread Neha Ojha
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 3:48 PM Neha Ojha wrote: > > Hello Frank, > > 15.2.17 includes > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/46611/commits/263e0fa6b3e6e1d6e7b382923a1d586d9d1ffa1b, > which adds capability in the ceph-objectstore-tool to trim the dup ops > that led to m

[ceph-users] Re: 17.2.2: all MGRs crashing in fresh cephadm install

2022-07-27 Thread Neha Ojha
Hi Daniel, This issue seems to be showing up in 17.2.2, details in https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/55304. We are currently in the process of validating the fix https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/47270 and we'll try to expedite a quick fix. In the meantime, we have builds/images of the dev version

[ceph-users] Ceph User + Dev Monthly August Meetup

2022-08-15 Thread Neha Ojha
Hi everyone, This month's Ceph User + Dev Monthly meetup is on August 18, 14:00-15:00 UTC. We are planning to get some user feedback on BlueStore compression modes. Please add other topics to the agenda: https://pad.ceph.com/p/ceph-user-dev-monthly-minutes. Hope to see you there! Thanks, Neha _

[ceph-users] Ceph Leadership Team Meeting Minutes - August 31, 2022

2022-08-31 Thread Neha Ojha
Hi everyone, Here are the topics discussed in today's meeting. - David Galoway's last CLT meeting, mixed emotions but we wish David all the best for all his future endeavors - Tracker upgrade postponed for now - OVH payment logistics handover to Patrick - Discussion on cephadm documentation - cep

[ceph-users] Re: Questions about the QA process and the data format of both OSD and MON

2022-09-01 Thread Neha Ojha
Hi Satoru, Apologies for the delay in responding to your questions. In the case of https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/45963, we caught the bug in an upgrade test (as described in https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/55444) and not in the rados test suite. Our upgrade test suites are meant to be run bef

[ceph-users] Ceph User + Dev Monthly September Meetup

2022-09-09 Thread Neha Ojha
Hi everyone, This month's Ceph User + Dev Monthly meetup is on September 15, 14:00-15:00 UTC. We would like to get some feedback on a POC that we are working on to measure availability in Ceph. Please add other topics to the agenda: https://pad.ceph.com/p/ceph-user-dev-monthly-minutes. Hope to se

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.4 QE Validation status

2022-09-14 Thread Neha Ojha
Hi Yuri, On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 8:02 AM Adam King wrote: > > orch suite failures fall under > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/49287 > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/57290 > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/57268 > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/52321 > > For rados/cephadm the failures are both

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.4 QE Validation status

2022-09-16 Thread Neha Ojha
The new rados runs look good, rados approved! Thanks, Neha On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 8:55 AM Nizamudeen A wrote: > > Dashboard LGTM! > > On Wed, 14 Sept 2022, 01:33 Yuri Weinstein, wrote: > > > Details of this release are summarized here: > > > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/57472#note-1 > > R

[ceph-users] Re: 17.2.4 RC available

2022-09-22 Thread Neha Ojha
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 12:55 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > We are publishing a release candidate this time for users to try > for testing only. > > Please note this RC had only limited testing. Full testing is being done now. It might be worth sharing that the Gibba cluster has been upgraded to

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.4 QE Validation status

2022-09-29 Thread Neha Ojha
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 9:38 AM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > Update: > > Remaining => > upgrade/octopus-x - Neha pls review/approve > Both the failures in http://pulpito.front.sepia.ceph.com/yuriw-2022-09-16_16:33:35-upgrade:octopus-x-quincy-release-distro-default-smithi/ seem related to RGW. Casey,

[ceph-users] Ceph Leadership Team Meeting Minutes - October 5, 2022

2022-10-05 Thread Neha Ojha
Hi everyone, Here are the topics discussed in today's meeting. - What changes with the announcement about IBM [1]? Nothing changes for the upstream Ceph community. There will be more focus on performance and scale testing. - 17.2.4 was released last week, no major issues reported yet. This releas

[ceph-users] Re: v15.2.4 Octopus released

2020-06-30 Thread Neha Ojha
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 6:04 PM Dan Mick wrote: > > True. That said, the blog post points to > http://download.ceph.com/tarballs/ where all the tarballs, including > 15.2.4, live. > > On 6/30/2020 5:57 PM, Sasha Litvak wrote: > > David, > > > > Download link points to 14.2.10 tarball. > > > > O

[ceph-users] Migration to ceph.readthedocs.io underway

2020-09-16 Thread Neha Ojha
Hi everyone, We are in the process of migrating from docs.ceph.com to ceph.readthedocs.io. We enabled it in https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/34499 and will now be using it by default. Why? - The search feature in ceph.readthedocs.io is much better than docs.ceph.com and allows you to search mul

[ceph-users] Re: Migration to ceph.readthedocs.io underway

2020-09-16 Thread Neha Ojha
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:51 AM Sasha Litvak wrote: > > I wonder if this new system allows me to choose Ceph versions. I see the > v:latest in the right bottom corner but it seems to be the only choice so far. Not yet, but that's where we plan to incorporate other versions. > > On Wed, Sep 16

[ceph-users] Re: Migration to ceph.readthedocs.io underway

2020-09-16 Thread Neha Ojha
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 11:08 AM Marc Roos wrote: > > > > - In the future you will not be able to read the docs if you have an > adblocker(?) not aware of anything of this sort > > > > -Original Message- > To: dev; ceph-users > Cc: Kefu Chai > Subject: [ceph-users] Migration to ceph.read

[ceph-users] Re: High CPU usage by ceph-mgr in 14.2.5

2019-12-19 Thread Neha Ojha
We'd let to verify it the network ping time monitoring feature in 14.2.5 is attributing to this problem. It'd be great if someone could try https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/43364#note-3 and let us know. Thanks, Neha On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 8:48 AM Mark Nelson wrote: > > If you can get a wallclock

[ceph-users] Re: High CPU usage by ceph-mgr in 14.2.5

2019-12-20 Thread Neha Ojha
Not yet, but we have a theory and a test build in https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/43364#note-6, if anybody would like to give it a try. Thanks, Neha On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 2:31 PM Sasha Litvak wrote: > > Was the root cause found and fixed? If so, will the fix be available in > 14.2.6 or soone

[ceph-users] Re: High CPU usage by ceph-mgr in 14.2.5

2019-12-24 Thread Neha Ojha
. We'll get this fix out in 14.2.6 after the holidays. On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 6:24 PM Neha Ojha wrote: > > Not yet, but we have a theory and a test build in > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/43364#note-6, if anybody would like to > give it a try. > > Thanks, > Neha >

[ceph-users] Re: High CPU usage by ceph-mgr in 14.2.6

2020-01-29 Thread Neha Ojha
Hi Joe, Can you grab a wallclock profiler dump from the mgr process and share it with us? This was useful for us to get to the root cause of the issue in 14.2.5. Quoting Mark's suggestion from "[ceph-users] High CPU usage by ceph-mgr in 14.2.5" below. If you can get a wallclock profiler on the m