[ceph-users] Re: *****SPAM***** Issue with very long connection times for newly upgraded OSD's.

2022-02-14 Thread Trey Palmer
Thanks, good question. I discovered the OMAP format conversion since I asked this, which could be bypassed by setting false on bluestore_fsck_quick_fix_on_mount. In which case the answer would be, no, it won't take 18 minutes again. Will test. -- Trey On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 4:37 PM Marc

[ceph-users] Issue with very long connection times for newly upgraded OSD's.

2022-02-14 Thread Trey Palmer
an hour or two to do the next node. The primary RGW data pool is 3+2 EC so I expect that recovery is a little slower than it would be in a replicated pool. Under Luminous they were only taking a few minutes to connect. Any ideas what could be happening here? Thanks, Trey Palmer

[ceph-users] Re: Monitoring slow ops

2022-02-09 Thread Trey Palmer
Thank y'all. This metric is exactly what we need. Turns out it was introduced in 14.2.17 and we have 14.2.9. On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 2:32 AM Konstantin Shalygin wrote: > Hi, > > On 9 Feb 2022, at 09:03, BenoƮt Knecht wrote: > > I don't remember in which Ceph release it was introduced, but

[ceph-users] Monitoring slow ops

2022-02-08 Thread Trey Palmer
r versions, as well. Thanks, Trey Palmer ___ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io

[ceph-users] Fwd: radosgw bucket stats "ver" and "master_ver"

2021-10-27 Thread Trey Palmer
ot as big I'm assuming because the buckets are less transient. Thanks, Trey Palmer ___ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io