[ceph-users] Re: [EXTERN] cache pressure?

2024-04-24 Thread Dietmar Rieder
Hi Erich, in our case the "client failing to respond to cache pressure" situation is/was often caused by users how have vscode connecting via ssh to our HPC head node. vscode makes heavy use of file watchers and we have seen users with > 400k watchers. All these watched files must be held in t

[ceph-users] Re: [EXTERN] cache pressure?

2024-04-26 Thread Erich Weiler
Hi Dietmar, We do in fact have a bunch of users running vscode on our HPC head node as well (in addition to a few of our general purpose interactive compute servers). I'll suggest they make the mods you referenced! Thanks for the tip. cheers, erich On 4/24/24 12:58 PM, Dietmar Rieder wrot

[ceph-users] Re: [EXTERN] cache pressure?

2024-04-27 Thread Dietmar Rieder
Hi Erich, hope it helps. Let us know. Dietmar Am 26. April 2024 15:52:06 MESZ schrieb Erich Weiler : >Hi Dietmar, > >We do in fact have a bunch of users running vscode on our HPC head node as >well (in addition to a few of our general purpose interactive compute >servers). I'll suggest they

[ceph-users] Re: [EXTERN] cache pressure?

2024-04-27 Thread Erich Weiler
Actually should I be excluding my whole cephfs filesystem? Like, if I mount it as /cephfs, should my stanza looks something like: { "files.watcherExclude": { "**/.git/objects/**": true, "**/.git/subtree-cache/**": true, "**/node_modules/*/**": true, "**/.cache/**": tru

[ceph-users] Re: [EXTERN] cache pressure?

2024-04-29 Thread Dietmar Rieder
there might be situations/dicrectories for which it makes a lot of sense that they are watched for changes and vscode is informed about these. So excluding the entire cephfs might not always be a good idea. But I guess you need to find out. Dietmar On 4/27/24 16:38, Erich Weiler wrote: Actua