, July 21, 2022 at 12:21 AM
> *To: *Mark Selby
> *Cc: *"d...@redhat.com" , "ceph-users@ceph.io" <
> ceph-users@ceph.io>
> *Subject: *Re: [ceph-users] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: RGW Bucket Notifications
> and MultiPart Uploads
>
>
>
> Hi Mark,
Re: [ceph-users] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: RGW Bucket Notifications and
MultiPart Uploads
Hi Mark,
Starting from quincy, we send 1 notification,
"ObjectCreated:CompleteMultipartUpload", when the upload is complete. See:
https://docs.ceph.com/en/quincy/radosgw/s3-notification-com
Hi Mark,
Starting from quincy, we send 1 notification,
"ObjectCreated:CompleteMultipartUpload", when the upload is complete. See:
https://docs.ceph.com/en/quincy/radosgw/s3-notification-compatibility/
We don't send the "ObjectCreated:Post" notification when the upload starts
as it will be confusing
I have not tested with Quincy/17.x yet so I do not know which notifications are
sent for Multipart uploads in this release set.
I know that for Pacific.16.x I needed to add some code/logic to only act on
notifications that represented the end state of an Object creation.
My tests show that when
Seems like the notification for a multipart upload should look different
to a normal upload?
Daniel
On 7/20/22 08:53, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote:
Can maybe leverage one of the other calls to check for upload completion:
list multipart uploads and/or list parts. The latter should work if you
h
Can maybe leverage one of the other calls to check for upload completion:
list multipart uploads and/or list parts. The latter should work if you
have the upload id at hand.
Yehuda
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022, 8:40 AM Casey Bodley wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 12:57 AM Yuval Lifshitz
> wrote:
> >
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 12:57 AM Yuval Lifshitz wrote:
>
> yes, that would work. you would get a "404" until the object is fully
> uploaded.
just note that you won't always get 404 before multipart complete,
because multipart uploads can overwrite existing objects
___
yes, that would work. you would get a "404" until the object is fully
uploaded.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 6:00 PM Mark Selby wrote:
> If you can that would be great. As it is likely to be a while before we
> make the 16 -> 17 switch.
>
>
>
> Question: If I receive the 1st put notification for the
If you can that would be great. As it is likely to be a while before we make
the 16 -> 17 switch.
Question: If I receive the 1st put notification for the partial object and I
check RGW to see if the object actually exists – do you know if RGW will tell
me that it is missing until the Object
