[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.11 pacific QE validation status

2023-01-24 Thread Josh Durgin
Looks good to go! On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 7:57 AM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > Josh, this is ready for your final review/approval and publishing > > Release notes - https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/49839 > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 4:00 AM Venky Shankar wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 11:22

[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.11 pacific QE validation status

2023-01-24 Thread Yuri Weinstein
Josh, this is ready for your final review/approval and publishing Release notes - https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/49839 On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 4:00 AM Venky Shankar wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 11:22 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > > > Ilya, Venky > > > > rbd, krbd, fs reruns are almost r

[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.11 pacific QE validation status

2023-01-24 Thread Venky Shankar
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 11:22 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > Ilya, Venky > > rbd, krbd, fs reruns are almost ready, pls review/approve fs approved. > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 2:30 AM Ilya Dryomov wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 5:38 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > > > > > The overall progre

[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.11 pacific QE validation status

2023-01-24 Thread Ilya Dryomov
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 6:51 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > Ilya, Venky > > rbd, krbd, fs reruns are almost ready, pls review/approve rbd and krbd approved. Thanks, Ilya ___ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe se

[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.11 pacific QE validation status

2023-01-23 Thread Yuri Weinstein
Ilya, Venky rbd, krbd, fs reruns are almost ready, pls review/approve On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 2:30 AM Ilya Dryomov wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 5:38 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > > > The overall progress on this release is looking much better and if we > > can approve it we can plan to pub

[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.11 pacific QE validation status

2023-01-23 Thread Ilya Dryomov
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 5:38 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > The overall progress on this release is looking much better and if we > can approve it we can plan to publish it early next week. > > Still seeking approvals > > rados - Neha, Laura > rook - Sébastien Han > cephadm - Adam > dashboard - Erne

[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.11 pacific QE validation status

2023-01-23 Thread Venky Shankar
Hey Yuri, On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 10:08 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > The overall progress on this release is looking much better and if we > can approve it we can plan to publish it early next week. > > Still seeking approvals > > rados - Neha, Laura > rook - Sébastien Han > cephadm - Adam > dash

[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.11 pacific QE validation status

2023-01-22 Thread Brad Hubbard
On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 2:39 AM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > The overall progress on this release is looking much better and if we > can approve it we can plan to publish it early next week. > > Still seeking approvals > > rados - Neha, Laura > rook - Sébastien Han > cephadm - Adam > dashboard - Erne

[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.11 pacific QE validation status

2023-01-20 Thread Nizamudeen A
Dashboard lgtm! Regards, Nizam On Fri, Jan 20, 2023, 22:09 Yuri Weinstein wrote: > The overall progress on this release is looking much better and if we > can approve it we can plan to publish it early next week. > > Still seeking approvals > > rados - Neha, Laura > rook - Sébastien Han > cepha

[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.11 pacific QE validation status

2023-01-20 Thread Neha Ojha
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 12:36 PM Laura Flores wrote: > From my end, rados looks good. All failures are known. Leaving final > approval to Neha. > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 12:03 PM Ernesto Puerta > wrote: > >> CCing Nizam as Dashboard lead for review & approval. >> >> Kind Regards, >> Ernesto >>

[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.11 pacific QE validation status

2023-01-20 Thread Laura Flores
From my end, rados looks good. All failures are known. Leaving final approval to Neha. On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 12:03 PM Ernesto Puerta wrote: > CCing Nizam as Dashboard lead for review & approval. > > Kind Regards, > Ernesto > > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 6:42 PM Adam King wrote: > >> cephadm ap

[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.11 pacific QE validation status

2023-01-20 Thread Ernesto Puerta
CCing Nizam as Dashboard lead for review & approval. Kind Regards, Ernesto On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 6:42 PM Adam King wrote: > cephadm approved. Known failures. > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 11:39 AM Yuri Weinstein > wrote: > >> The overall progress on this release is looking much better and if

[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.11 pacific QE validation status

2023-01-20 Thread Adam King
cephadm approved. Known failures. On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 11:39 AM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > The overall progress on this release is looking much better and if we > can approve it we can plan to publish it early next week. > > Still seeking approvals > > rados - Neha, Laura > rook - Sébastien Han

[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.11 pacific QE validation status

2023-01-20 Thread Casey Bodley
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 11:39 AM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > The overall progress on this release is looking much better and if we > can approve it we can plan to publish it early next week. > > Still seeking approvals > > rados - Neha, Laura > rook - Sébastien Han > cephadm - Adam > dashboard - Ern

[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.11 pacific QE validation status

2023-01-20 Thread Yuri Weinstein
The overall progress on this release is looking much better and if we can approve it we can plan to publish it early next week. Still seeking approvals rados - Neha, Laura rook - Sébastien Han cephadm - Adam dashboard - Ernesto rgw - Casey rbd - Ilya (full rbd run in progress now) krbd - Ilya fs

[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.11 pacific QE validation status

2023-01-17 Thread Yuri Weinstein
OK I will rerun failed jobs filtering rhel in Thx! On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 10:43 AM Adam Kraitman wrote: > > Hey the satellite issue was fixed > > Thanks > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 7:43 PM Laura Flores wrote: >> >> This was my summary of rados failures. There was nothing new or amiss, >> altho

[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.11 pacific QE validation status

2023-01-17 Thread Adam Kraitman
Hey the satellite issue was fixed Thanks On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 7:43 PM Laura Flores wrote: > This was my summary of rados failures. There was nothing new or amiss, > although it is important to note that runs were done with filtering out > rhel 8. > > I will leave it to Neha for final approva

[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.11 pacific QE validation status

2023-01-17 Thread Laura Flores
This was my summary of rados failures. There was nothing new or amiss, although it is important to note that runs were done with filtering out rhel 8. I will leave it to Neha for final approval. Failures: 1. https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/58258 2. https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/58146

[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.11 pacific QE validation status

2023-01-17 Thread Yuri Weinstein
Ilya krbd had a bad link pasted (ran without -d ubuntu -D 20.04) This is a better run: https://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2023-01-15_16:16:11-krbd-pacific_16.2.11_RC6.6-testing-default-smithi/ On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 9:11 AM Ilya Dryomov wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 4:46 PM Yuri Weinstein w

[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.11 pacific QE validation status

2023-01-17 Thread Ilya Dryomov
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 4:46 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > Please see the test results on the rebased RC 6.6 in this comment: > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/58257#note-2 > > We're still having infrastructure issues making testing difficult. > Therefore all reruns were done excluding the rhel 8

[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.11 pacific QE validation status

2023-01-17 Thread Yuri Weinstein
Please see the test results on the rebased RC 6.6 in this comment: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/58257#note-2 We're still having infrastructure issues making testing difficult. Therefore all reruns were done excluding the rhel 8 distro ('--filter-out rhel_8') Also, the upgrades failed and Adam

[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.11 pacific QE validation status

2023-01-08 Thread Yuri Weinstein
Happy New Year all! This release remains to be in "progress"/"on hold" status as we are sorting all infrastructure-related issues. Unless I hear objections, I suggest doing a full rebase/retest QE cycle (adding PRs merged lately) since it's taking much longer than anticipated when sepia is back o

[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.11 pacific QE validation status

2022-12-22 Thread Brad Hubbard
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 8:33 AM Brad Hubbard wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 3:15 AM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > > > Details of this release are summarized here: > > > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/58257#note-1 > > Release Notes - TBD > > > > Seeking approvals for: > > > > rados - Neha (http

[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.11 pacific QE validation status

2022-12-22 Thread Neha Ojha
rados runs for pacific_16.2.11_RC3 look good! Unrelated failures summarized in https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/58257#note-1. Thanks, Neha On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 11:43 AM Neha Ojha wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 11:41 AM Casey Bodley wrote: > >> thanks Yuri, rgw approved based on today's

[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.11 pacific QE validation status

2022-12-20 Thread Neha Ojha
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 11:41 AM Casey Bodley wrote: > thanks Yuri, rgw approved based on today's results from > > https://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2022-12-20_15:27:49-rgw-pacific_16.2.11_RC2-distro-default-smithi/ > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 12:08 PM Yuri Weinstein > wrote: > > > If you look at t

[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.11 pacific QE validation status

2022-12-20 Thread Casey Bodley
thanks Yuri, rgw approved based on today's results from https://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2022-12-20_15:27:49-rgw-pacific_16.2.11_RC2-distro-default-smithi/ On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 12:08 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > If you look at the pacific 16.2.8 QE validation history ( > https://tracker.ceph.com/

[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.11 pacific QE validation status

2022-12-19 Thread Adam King
cephadm approved. rados/cephadm failures are mostly caused by https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/49285 not being merged (which just touches tests and docs so wouldn't block a release). Thanks - Adam King On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 12:15 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > Details of this release are summar

[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.11 pacific QE validation status

2022-12-19 Thread Guillaume Abrioux
Hi Yuri, ceph-volume approved. Thanks, On Mon, 19 Dec 2022 at 09:59, Nizamudeen A wrote: > dashboard approved. > > Regards, > Nizam > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 10:45 PM Yuri Weinstein > wrote: > >> Details of this release are summarized here: >> >> https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/58257#note-1

[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.11 pacific QE validation status

2022-12-19 Thread Nizamudeen A
dashboard approved. Regards, Nizam On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 10:45 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > Details of this release are summarized here: > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/58257#note-1 > Release Notes - TBD > > Seeking approvals for: > > rados - Neha (https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/49431 is

[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.11 pacific QE validation status

2022-12-19 Thread Venky Shankar
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 10:45 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > Details of this release are summarized here: > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/58257#note-1 > Release Notes - TBD > > Seeking approvals for: > > rados - Neha (https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/49431 is still being > tested and will be me

[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.11 pacific QE validation status

2022-12-16 Thread Ilya Dryomov
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 11:56 PM Laura Flores wrote: > > I reviewed the upgrade runs: > > https://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2022-12-13_15:57:57-upgrade:nautilus-x-pacific_16.2.11_RC-distro-default-smithi/ > https://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2022-12-13_21:47:46-upgrade:nautilus-x-pacific_16.2.11_RC-distr

[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.11 pacific QE validation status

2022-12-16 Thread Ilya Dryomov
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 6:15 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > Details of this release are summarized here: > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/58257#note-1 > Release Notes - TBD > > Seeking approvals for: > > rados - Neha (https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/49431 is still being > tested and will be mer

[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.11 pacific QE validation status

2022-12-15 Thread Laura Flores
I reviewed the upgrade runs: https://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2022-12-13_15:57:57-upgrade:nautilus-x-pacific_16.2.11_RC-distro-default-smithi/ https://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2022-12-13_21:47:46-upgrade:nautilus-x-pacific_16.2.11_RC-distro-default-smithi/ https://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2022-12-13_15:

[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.11 pacific QE validation status

2022-12-15 Thread Brad Hubbard
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 3:15 AM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > Details of this release are summarized here: > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/58257#note-1 > Release Notes - TBD > > Seeking approvals for: > > rados - Neha (https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/49431 is still being > tested and will be mer