, 2024 9:46 AM
To: ceph-users@ceph.io
Subject: [ceph-users] Re: Adding OSD's results in slow ops, inactive PG's
I'm glad to hear (or read) that it worked for you as well. :-)
Zitat von Torkil Svensgaard :
On 18/01/2024 09:30, Eugen Block wrote:
Hi,
[ceph: root@lazy /]# ceph-conf --show-config
,
=
Frank Schilder
AIT Risø Campus
Bygning 109, rum S14
From: Eugen Block
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2024 9:46 AM
To: ceph-users@ceph.io
Subject: [ceph-users] Re: Adding OSD's results in slow ops, inactive PG's
I'm glad to hear (or read) that it worked
I'm glad to hear (or read) that it worked for you as well. :-)
Zitat von Torkil Svensgaard :
On 18/01/2024 09:30, Eugen Block wrote:
Hi,
[ceph: root@lazy /]# ceph-conf --show-config | egrep
osd_max_pg_per_osd_hard_ratio
osd_max_pg_per_osd_hard_ratio = 3.00
I don't think this is the
On 18/01/2024 09:30, Eugen Block wrote:
Hi,
[ceph: root@lazy /]# ceph-conf --show-config | egrep
osd_max_pg_per_osd_hard_ratio
osd_max_pg_per_osd_hard_ratio = 3.00
I don't think this is the right tool, it says:
--show-config-value Print the corresponding ceph.conf value
Hi,
[ceph: root@lazy /]# ceph-conf --show-config | egrep
osd_max_pg_per_osd_hard_ratio
osd_max_pg_per_osd_hard_ratio = 3.00
I don't think this is the right tool, it says:
--show-config-valuePrint the corresponding ceph.conf value
that matches
On 18/01/2024 07:48, Eugen Block wrote:
Hi,
-3281> 2024-01-17T14:57:54.611+ 7f2c6f7ef540 0 osd.431 2154828
load_pgs opened 750 pgs <---
I'd say that's close enough to what I suspected. ;-) Not sure why the
"maybe_wait_for_max_pg" message isn't there but I'd give it a try with a
Hi,
-3281> 2024-01-17T14:57:54.611+ 7f2c6f7ef540 0 osd.431 2154828
load_pgs opened 750 pgs <---
I'd say that's close enough to what I suspected. ;-) Not sure why the
"maybe_wait_for_max_pg" message isn't there but I'd give it a try with
a higher osd_max_pg_per_osd_hard_ratio.
On 17-01-2024 22:20, Eugen Block wrote:
Hi,
Hi
this sounds a bit like a customer issue we had almost two years ago.
Basically, it was about mon_max_pg_per_osd (default 250) which was
exceeded during the first activating OSD (and the last remaining
stopping OSD). You can read all the
Hi,
this sounds a bit like a customer issue we had almost two years ago.
Basically, it was about mon_max_pg_per_osd (default 250) which was
exceeded during the first activating OSD (and the last remaining
stopping OSD). You can read all the details in the lengthy thread [1].
But if this
