[ceph-users] Re: Advice on sizing WAL/DB cluster for Optane and SATA SSD disks.

2020-03-15 Thread Виталий Филиппов
WAL is 1G (you can allocate 2 to be sure), DB should always be 30G. And this doesn't depend on the size of the data partition :-) 14 марта 2020 г. 22:50:37 GMT+03:00, Victor Hooi пишет: >Hi, > >I'm building a 4-node Proxmox cluster, with Ceph for the VM disk >storage. > >On each node, I have: >

[ceph-users] Re: Advice on sizing WAL/DB cluster for Optane and SATA SSD disks.

2020-03-15 Thread Victor Hooi
Hi, Vitaliy - Sure, I can use those absolute values (30GB for DB, 2GB for WAL) you suggested. Currently - Proxmox is defaulting to a 178.85 GB partition for the DB/WAL. (It seems to put the DB and WAL on the same partition). Using your calculations, with 6 x OSDs per host - that means a total of

[ceph-users] Re: Advice on sizing WAL/DB cluster for Optane and SATA SSD disks.

2020-03-16 Thread Janne Johansson
Den sön 15 mars 2020 kl 14:06 skrev Виталий Филиппов : > WAL is 1G (you can allocate 2 to be sure), DB should always be 30G. And > this doesn't depend on the size of the data partition :-) > DB should be either 3, 30 or 300 depending on how much you can spare on the fast devices. 30 is probably g

[ceph-users] Re: Advice on sizing WAL/DB cluster for Optane and SATA SSD disks.

2020-03-16 Thread vitalif
Hi Victor, 1) RocksDB doesn't put L4 on the fast device if it's less than ~ 286 GB, so no. But, anyway, there's usually no L4, so 30 GB is usually sufficient. I had ~17 GB block.dbs even for 8 TB hard drives used for RBD... RGW probably uses slightly more if stored objects are small... but yo

[ceph-users] Re: Advice on sizing WAL/DB cluster for Optane and SATA SSD disks.

2020-03-16 Thread Igor Fedotov
On 3/16/2020 3:25 PM, vita...@yourcmc.ru wrote: Hi Victor, 1) RocksDB doesn't put L4 on the fast device if it's less than ~ 286 GB, so no. But, anyway, there's usually no L4, so 30 GB is usually sufficient. I had ~17 GB block.dbs even for 8 TB hard drives used for RBD... RGW probably uses s