https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/58057 represents the beginning of a response
to issue II (Ceph command-presentation convention standardization) in Joel's
email above.
I plan to add angle brackets (or something like them) in the near future. I
think it might be worth putting down here in
Custom names were never really 100% implemented, and I would not be surprised
if they don't work in Reef.
> On Jun 11, 2024, at 14:02, Joel Davidow wrote:
>
> Zac,
>
> Thanks for your super-fast response and action on this. Those four items
> are great and the corresponding email as
Zac,
Thanks for your super-fast response and action on this. Those four items
are great and the corresponding email as reformatted looks good.
Jana's point about cluster names is a good one. The deprecation of custom
cluster names, which appears to have started in octopus per
> Note the difference of convention in ceph command presentation. In
> https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/rados/troubleshooting/troubleshooting-mon/#understanding-mon-status,
> mon.X uses X to represent the portion of the command to be replaced by the
> operator with a specific value. However, that
Joel,
Thank you for this message. This is a model of what in a perfect world user
communication with upstream documentation could be.
I identify four things in your message that I can work on immediately:
1. leader/peon documentation improvement
2. Ceph command-presentation convention
