[ceph-users] Re: Ceph 16.2.14: pgmap updated every few seconds for no apparent reason

2023-10-25 Thread Zakhar Kirpichenko
Thanks for the warning, Eugen. /Z On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 13:04, Eugen Block wrote: > Hi, > > this setting is not as harmless as I assumed. There seem to be more > ticks/periods/health_checks involved. When I choose a mgr_tick_period > value > 30 seconds the two MGRs keep respawning. 30 seconds

[ceph-users] Re: Ceph 16.2.14: pgmap updated every few seconds for no apparent reason

2023-10-25 Thread Eugen Block
Hi, this setting is not as harmless as I assumed. There seem to be more ticks/periods/health_checks involved. When I choose a mgr_tick_period value > 30 seconds the two MGRs keep respawning. 30 seconds are the highest value that still seemed to work without MGR respawn, even with increase

[ceph-users] Re: Ceph 16.2.14: pgmap updated every few seconds for no apparent reason

2023-10-19 Thread Zakhar Kirpichenko
Thanks, Eugen. This is a useful setting. /Z On Thu, 19 Oct 2023 at 10:43, Eugen Block wrote: > Hi, > > you can change the report interval with this config option (default 2 > seconds): > > $ ceph config get mgr mgr_tick_period > 2 > > $ ceph config set mgr mgr_tick_period 10 > > Regards, > Euge

[ceph-users] Re: Ceph 16.2.14: pgmap updated every few seconds for no apparent reason

2023-10-19 Thread Eugen Block
Hi, you can change the report interval with this config option (default 2 seconds): $ ceph config get mgr mgr_tick_period 2 $ ceph config set mgr mgr_tick_period 10 Regards, Eugen Zitat von Chris Palmer : I have just checked 2 quincy 17.2.6 clusters, and I see exactly the same. The pgma

[ceph-users] Re: Ceph 16.2.14: pgmap updated every few seconds for no apparent reason

2023-10-13 Thread Chris Palmer
I have just checked 2 quincy 17.2.6 clusters, and I see exactly the same. The pgmap version is bumping every two seconds (which ties in with the frequency you observed). Both clusters are healthy with nothing apart from client IO happening. On 13/10/2023 12:09, Zakhar Kirpichenko wrote: Hi,