Hi,
understandable, but we played with the PGs of our rbd cache pool a
couple of times, last time was year ago (although it only has roughly
200 GB of data in it). We haven't noticed any issues. But to be fair,
we only use this one cache tier. And there's probably a reason why
it's not re
Hi Eugen.
I've tried. The system says it's not recommended but I may force it.
Forcing something with the risk of losing data is not something I'm going
to do.
Best regards
Daniel
On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 8:55 PM Eugen Block wrote:
> Hi,
>
> just because the autoscaler doesn’t increase the pg_n
Hi,
just because the autoscaler doesn’t increase the pg_num doesn’t mean
you can’t increase it manually. Have you tried that?
Zitat von Daniel Persson :
Hi Team.
We are currently in the process of changing the size of our cache pool.
Currently it's set to 32 PGs and distributed weirdly on
