On 11/17/23 00:41, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 5:26 PM Matt Larson wrote:
Ilya,
Thank you for providing these discussion threads on the Kernel fixes for
where there was a change and details on this affects the clients.
What is the expected behavior in CephFS client when
On 11/16/23 22:39, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 3:21 AM Xiubo Li wrote:
Hi Matt,
On 11/15/23 02:40, Matt Larson wrote:
On CentOS 7 systems with the CephFS kernel client, if the data pool has a
`nearfull` status there is a slight reduction in write speeds (possibly
20-50% fewer
On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 5:26 PM Matt Larson wrote:
>
> Ilya,
>
> Thank you for providing these discussion threads on the Kernel fixes for
> where there was a change and details on this affects the clients.
>
> What is the expected behavior in CephFS client when there are multiple data
> pools
Ilya,
Thank you for providing these discussion threads on the Kernel fixes for
where there was a change and details on this affects the clients.
What is the expected behavior in CephFS client when there are multiple
data pools in the CephFS? Does having 'nearfull' in any data pool in the
CephFS
On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 3:21 AM Xiubo Li wrote:
>
> Hi Matt,
>
> On 11/15/23 02:40, Matt Larson wrote:
> > On CentOS 7 systems with the CephFS kernel client, if the data pool has a
> > `nearfull` status there is a slight reduction in write speeds (possibly
> > 20-50% fewer IOPS).
> >
> > On a simi
Hi Matt,
On 11/15/23 02:40, Matt Larson wrote:
On CentOS 7 systems with the CephFS kernel client, if the data pool has a
`nearfull` status there is a slight reduction in write speeds (possibly
20-50% fewer IOPS).
On a similar Rocky 8 system with the CephFS kernel client, if the data pool
has `n