: 16 June 2021 10:18:02
To: huxia...@horebdata.cn
Cc: Joe Comeau; ceph-users
Subject: [ceph-users] Re: Fwd: Re: Issues with Ceph network redundancy using L2
MC-LAG
Depends on when you configure the switch port. For dell :
Interface Ethernet 1/1/20
No switchport
Channel-group 10 mode active
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, June 16, 2021 10:18 AM, Andrew Walker-Brown
wrote:
> With active mode, you then have a transmit hashing policy, usually set
> globally.
>
> On Linux the bond would be set as ‘bond-mode 802.3ad’ and then
> ‘bond-xmit-hash-policy layer3+4’ - or
e 2021 09:29
To: Andrew Walker-Brown<mailto:andrew_jbr...@hotmail.com>
Cc: huxia...@horebdata.cn<mailto:huxia...@horebdata.cn>; Joe
Comeau<mailto:joe.com...@hli.ubc.ca>; ceph-users<mailto:ceph-users@ceph.io>
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Re: Fwd: Re: Issues with Ceph
eau
> Date: 2021-06-15 23:44
> To: ceph-users@ceph.io
> Subject: [ceph-users] Fwd: Re: Issues with Ceph network redundancy using L2
> MC-LAG
> We also run with Dell VLT switches (40 GB)
> everything is active/active, so multiple paths as Andrew describes in
> his config
> O
.
What else should i take care to ensure fault tolerance when one path is bad?
best regards,
samuel
huxia...@horebdata.cn
From: Joe Comeau
Date: 2021-06-15 23:44
To: ceph-users@ceph.io
Subject: [ceph-users] Fwd: Re: Issues with Ceph network redundancy using L2
MC-LAG
We also run with Dell VLT
] Fwd: Re: Issues with Ceph network redundancy using L2
MC-LAG
We also run with Dell VLT switches (40 GB)
everything is active/active, so multiple paths as Andrew describes in
his config
Our config allows us:
bring down one of the switches for upgrades
bring down an iscsi gatway for patching
all
