Hi Frank,
Thank you for the incredibly detailed reply! Will respond inline.
On 8/17/22 7:06 AM, Frank Schilder wrote:
Hi Mark,
please find below a detailed report with data and observations from our
production
system. The ceph version is mimic-latest and some ways of configuring
compressi
On 8/11/22 03:20, Frank Schilder wrote:
Hi Mark,
I'm preparing a response with some data from our production system and will
also open a new thread on the tail merging topic. Both topics are quite large
in themselves. Just a quick question for understanding:
I was in fact referring to the ya
Hi Mark,
I'm preparing a response with some data from our production system and will
also open a new thread on the tail merging topic. Both topics are quite large
in themselves. Just a quick question for understanding:
> I was in fact referring to the yaml config and pool options ...
I don't k
On 8/10/22 10:08, Frank Schilder wrote:
Hi Mark.
I actually had no idea that you needed both the yaml option
and the pool option configured
I guess you are referring to ceph-adm deployments, which I'm not using. In the
ceph config data base, both options mush be enabled irrespective of how t
We are using pool level compression (aggressive) for our large EC tier. Since
we already had data in the pool when the feature was enabled I was unable to do
in depth testing and tuning to get the best results. "Low hanging fruit" put
654T Under compression with 327T used. Not bad, but I know
Hi Frank,
Thank you very much for the reply! If you don't mind me asking, what's
the use case? We're trying to determine if we might be able to do
compression at a higher level than blob with the eventual goal of
simplifying the underlying data structures. I actually had no idea that
you
