[ceph-users] Re: bluefs_buffered_io

2021-07-27 Thread Dan van der Ster
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 1:46 PM Marcel Kuiper wrote: > > We recently upgraded one of our clusters from 14.2.21 to 15.2.13 and had > some troubles with osd performance. After reading some threads we > manually compacted the rocksdb's on all osds and hope that that will > alleviate the problem > > I

[ceph-users] Re: bluefs_buffered_io=false performance regression

2021-01-11 Thread Mark Nelson
Hi Robert, We are definitely aware of this issue.  It appears to often be related to snap trimming and we believe possibly related to excessive thrashing of the rocksdb block cache.  I suspect that when bluefs_buffered_io is enabled it hides the issue and people don't notice the problem, but

[ceph-users] Re: bluefs_buffered_io=false performance regression

2021-01-11 Thread Dan van der Ster
And to add some references, there is a PR on hold here: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/38044 which links some relevant trackers entries. Outside of large block.db removals (e.g. from backfilling or snap trimming) we didn't notice a huge difference -- though that is not conclusive. There are seve

[ceph-users] Re: bluefs_buffered_io=false performance regression

2021-01-11 Thread Robert Sander
Hi Marc and Dan, thanks for your quick responses assuring me that we did nothing totally wrong. Regards -- Robert Sander Heinlein Support GmbH Schwedter Str. 8/9b, 10119 Berlin http://www.heinlein-support.de Tel: 030 / 405051-43 Fax: 030 / 405051-19 Zwangsangaben lt. §35a GmbHG: HRB 93818 B /

[ceph-users] Re: bluefs_buffered_io turn to true

2021-05-13 Thread Konstantin Shalygin
Hi, This is not a normal, It's something different I think, like a crush changes on restart. This option will be enabled by default again in Nautilus next, so you can use it now with 14.2.19-20 k Sent from my iPhone > On 14 May 2021, at 08:21, Szabo, Istvan (Agoda) > wrote: > > Hi, > >