[ceph-users] Re: cephadm/podman :: upgrade to pacific stuck

2021-04-08 Thread Adrian Sevcenco
Hi! (and thanks for taking your time to answer my email :) ) On 4/8/21 1:18 AM, Sage Weil wrote: You would normally tell cephadm to deploy another mgr with 'ceph orch apply mgr 2'. In this case, the default placement policy for mgrs is already either 2 or 3, though--the problem is that you

[ceph-users] Re: cephadm/podman :: upgrade to pacific stuck

2021-04-07 Thread Sage Weil
You would normally tell cephadm to deploy another mgr with 'ceph orch apply mgr 2'. In this case, the default placement policy for mgrs is already either 2 or 3, though--the problem is that you only have 1 host in your cluster, and cephadm currently doesn't handle placing multiple mgrs on a

[ceph-users] Re: cephadm/podman :: upgrade to pacific stuck

2021-04-01 Thread Adrian Sevcenco
On 4/1/21 8:19 PM, Anthony D'Atri wrote: I think what it’s saying is that it wants for more than one mgr daemon to be provisioned, so that it can failover unfortunately it is not allowed as the port usage is clashing ... i found out the name of the daemon by grepping the ps output (it would be

[ceph-users] Re: cephadm/podman :: upgrade to pacific stuck

2021-04-01 Thread Anthony D'Atri
I think what it’s saying is that it wants for more than one mgr daemon to be provisioned, so that it can failover when the primary is restarted. I suspect you would then run into the same thing with the mon. All sorts of things tend to crop up on a cluster this minimal. > On Apr 1, 2021, at