[ceph-users] Re: cephfs max_file_size

2023-05-23 Thread Gregory Farnum
On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 3:28 AM Dietmar Rieder wrote: > > Hi, > > can the cephfs "max_file_size" setting be changed at any point in the > lifetime of a cephfs? > Or is it critical for existing data if it is changed after some time? Is > there anything to consider when changing, let's say, from

[ceph-users] Re: cephfs max_file_size

2023-05-23 Thread Konstantin Shalygin
Hi, > On 23 May 2023, at 13:27, Dietmar Rieder wrote: > > can the cephfs "max_file_size" setting be changed at any point in the > lifetime of a cephfs? > Or is it critical for existing data if it is changed after some time? Is > there anything to consider when changing, let's say, from 1TB

[ceph-users] Re: CephFS max_file_size

2021-03-25 Thread Frédéric Nass
0 1:59 PM To: Mark Schouten Cc: ceph-users; Patrick Donnelly Subject: [ceph-users] Re: CephFS max_file_size I've had this set to 16TiB for several years now. I've not seen any ill effects. -- Adam On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:56 PM Patrick Donnelly wrote: Hi Mark, On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 4:21 AM Ma

[ceph-users] Re: CephFS max_file_size

2020-12-11 Thread Paul Mezzanini
ender and destroy any copies of this information. From: Adam Tygart Sent: Friday, December 11, 2020 1:59 PM To: Mark Schouten Cc: ceph-users; Patrick Donnelly Subject: [ceph-users] Re: CephFS max_file_size I've had this set to

[ceph-users] Re: CephFS max_file_size

2020-12-11 Thread Adam Tygart
I've had this set to 16TiB for several years now. I've not seen any ill effects. -- Adam On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:56 PM Patrick Donnelly wrote: > > Hi Mark, > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 4:21 AM Mark Schouten wrote: > > There is a default limit of 1TiB for the max_file_size in CephFS. I

[ceph-users] Re: CephFS max_file_size

2020-12-11 Thread Patrick Donnelly
Hi Mark, On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 4:21 AM Mark Schouten wrote: > There is a default limit of 1TiB for the max_file_size in CephFS. I altered > that to 2TiB, but I now got a request for storing a file up to 7TiB. > > I'd expect the limit to be there for a reason, but what is the risk of >