> So, its not necessarily a "which one should I support". One of cephs great
> features is you can support all 3 with the same storage and use them all as
> needed.
..with the caveat that you can't serve the same files over them, but
it is quite true that you can have all three served from the
The quick answer, is they are optimized for different use cases.
Things like relational databases (mysql, postgresql) benefit from the
performance that a dedicated filesystem can provide (rbd). Shared filesystems
are usually counter indicated with such software.
Shared filesystems like cephfs
Yeah, agreed. My first question would be how is your user going to consume
the storage?
You'll struggle to run VM's on RadosGW and if they are doing archival
backups then RBD is likely not the best solution.
Each has very different requirements at the hardware level, for example if
you are
Hi Jorge,
I think it depends on your workload.
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 7:43 PM Jorge Garcia wrote:
>
> This may be too broad of a topic, or opening a can of worms, but we are
> running a CEPH environment and I was wondering if there's any guidance
> about this question:
>
> Given that some
