[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.6 QE Validation status

2023-04-07 Thread Yuri Weinstein
Update: The release is ready to be published, but we have problems with the signing VM. That VM is being actively fixed as we speak (thank you, Dan, Ken, and Zack!) However, we need to delay the publishing till early next week. Thx and sorry for the delay. YuriW On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 7:16 AM

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.6 QE Validation status

2023-04-05 Thread Crown Upholstery
ceph-users@ceph.io stop From: Thomas Widhalm Sent: Wednesday, April 5, 2023 7:26 AM To: ceph-users@ceph.io Subject: [ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.6 QE Validation status Sorry for interfereing, but: Wh!! Thank you so much for the great work. Can't wait

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.6 QE Validation status

2023-04-05 Thread Crown Upholstery
d...@ceph.io stop From: Thomas Widhalm Sent: Wednesday, April 5, 2023 7:26 AM To: ceph-users@ceph.io Subject: [ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.6 QE Validation status Sorry for interfereing, but: Wh!! Thank you so much for the great work. Can't wait

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.6 QE Validation status

2023-04-05 Thread Yuri Weinstein
Thx, Josh! We will start releasing now. Release notes - https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/50721 On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 7:16 AM Josh Durgin wrote: > The LRC upgraded with no problems, so this release is good to go! > > Josh > > On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 3:36 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > >> Josh,

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.6 QE Validation status

2023-04-05 Thread Thomas Widhalm
Sorry for interfereing, but: Wh!! Thank you so much for the great work. Can't wait for the release with a good chance to get access to my data again. On 05.04.23 16:15, Josh Durgin wrote: The LRC upgraded with no problems, so this release is good to go! Josh On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.6 QE Validation status

2023-04-05 Thread Josh Durgin
The LRC upgraded with no problems, so this release is good to go! Josh On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 3:36 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > Josh, the release is ready for your review and approval. > > Adam, can you please update the LRC upgrade to 17.2.6 RC? > > Thx > > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 3:07 PM

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.6 QE Validation status

2023-04-03 Thread Yuri Weinstein
Josh, the release is ready for your review and approval. Adam, can you please update the LRC upgrade to 17.2.6 RC? Thx On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 3:07 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > The release has been approved. > > And the gibba cluster upgraded. > > We are awaiting the LRC upgrade and then/or in

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.6 QE Validation status

2023-03-30 Thread Radoslaw Zarzynski
rados: approved! On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 7:02 PM Laura Flores wrote: > Rados review, second round: > > Failures: > 1. https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/58560 > 2. https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/58476 > 3. https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/58475 -- pending Q backport > 4.

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.6 QE Validation status

2023-03-29 Thread Yuri Weinstein
The release has been approved. And the gibba cluster upgraded. We are awaiting the LRC upgrade and then/or in parallel will publish an RC for testing. ETA for the release publishing is 04/07/23 On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 2:59 PM Neha Ojha wrote: > upgrades approved! > > Thanks, > Neha > > On

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.6 QE Validation status

2023-03-28 Thread Neha Ojha
upgrades approved! Thanks, Neha On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 12:09 PM Radoslaw Zarzynski wrote: > rados: approved! > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 7:02 PM Laura Flores wrote: > >> Rados review, second round: >> >> Failures: >> 1. https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/58560 >> 2.

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.6 QE Validation status

2023-03-27 Thread Laura Flores
Rados review, second round: Failures: 1. https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/58560 2. https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/58476 3. https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/58475 -- pending Q backport 4. https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/49287 5. https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/58585 Details:

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.6 QE Validation status

2023-03-27 Thread Casey Bodley
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 3:46 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > Details of this release are updated here: > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/59070#note-1 > Release Notes - TBD > > The slowness we experienced seemed to be self-cured. > Neha, Radek, and Laura please provide any findings if you have

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.6 QE Validation status

2023-03-27 Thread Venky Shankar
On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 1:17 AM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > Details of this release are updated here: > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/59070#note-1 > Release Notes - TBD > > The slowness we experienced seemed to be self-cured. > Neha, Radek, and Laura please provide any findings if you have

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.6 QE Validation status

2023-03-27 Thread Nizamudeen A
Dashboard LGTM! On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 1:16 AM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > Details of this release are updated here: > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/59070#note-1 > Release Notes - TBD > > The slowness we experienced seemed to be self-cured. > Neha, Radek, and Laura please provide any findings

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.6 QE Validation status

2023-03-26 Thread Brad Hubbard
On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 5:46 AM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > Details of this release are updated here: > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/59070#note-1 > Release Notes - TBD > > The slowness we experienced seemed to be self-cured. > Neha, Radek, and Laura please provide any findings if you have

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.6 QE Validation status

2023-03-24 Thread Yuri Weinstein
Details of this release are updated here: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/59070#note-1 Release Notes - TBD The slowness we experienced seemed to be self-cured. Neha, Radek, and Laura please provide any findings if you have them. Seeking approvals/reviews for: rados - Neha, Radek, Travis,

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.6 QE Validation status

2023-03-23 Thread Ken Dreyer
How much more time do we need to get PR 50549 in if we delayed v17.2.6? - Ken On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 2:44 PM Laura Flores wrote: > We are all good on the Core end of things. > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/50549 is needed for downstream, but it > should not block upstream. > > On Thu, Mar

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.6 QE Validation status

2023-03-23 Thread Laura Flores
I will have a review of the rados suite ready soon. On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 1:44 PM Laura Flores wrote: > We are all good on the Core end of things. > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/50549 is needed for downstream, but it > should not block upstream. > > On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 12:59 PM Laura

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.6 QE Validation status

2023-03-23 Thread Laura Flores
We are all good on the Core end of things. https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/50549 is needed for downstream, but it should not block upstream. On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 12:59 PM Laura Flores wrote: > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/50575 was also merged. > > On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 12:36 PM

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.6 QE Validation status

2023-03-23 Thread Laura Flores
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/50575 was also merged. On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 12:36 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > We are still working on core PRs: > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/50549 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/50625 - merged > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/50575 > > Will

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.6 QE Validation status

2023-03-23 Thread Yuri Weinstein
We are still working on core PRs: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/50549 https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/50625 - merged https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/50575 Will update as soon as we are ready for the next steps. On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 10:34 AM Casey Bodley wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 22,

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.6 QE Validation status

2023-03-23 Thread Casey Bodley
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 9:27 AM Casey Bodley wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 4:06 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > > > Details of this release are summarized here: > > > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/59070#note-1 > > Release Notes - TBD > > > > The reruns were in the queue for 4 days because

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.6 QE Validation status

2023-03-22 Thread Venky Shankar
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 1:36 AM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > Details of this release are summarized here: > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/59070#note-1 > Release Notes - TBD > > The reruns were in the queue for 4 days because of some slowness issues. > The core team (Neha, Radek, Laura, and

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.6 QE Validation status

2023-03-22 Thread Adam King
orch approved. After reruns, the only failed jobs in the orch run were orch/rook tests (which are broken currently) and 2 instances of "Test failure: test_non_existent_cluster". That failure is just a command expecting a zero return code and an error message instead of a nonzero return code in a

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.6 QE Validation status

2023-03-22 Thread Ilya Dryomov
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 9:06 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > Details of this release are summarized here: > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/59070#note-1 > Release Notes - TBD > > The reruns were in the queue for 4 days because of some slowness issues. > The core team (Neha, Radek, Laura, and

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.6 QE Validation status

2023-03-22 Thread Casey Bodley
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 4:06 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > Details of this release are summarized here: > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/59070#note-1 > Release Notes - TBD > > The reruns were in the queue for 4 days because of some slowness issues. > The core team (Neha, Radek, Laura, and

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.6 QE Validation status

2023-03-21 Thread Laura Flores
I reviewed the upgrade tests. I opened two new trackers: 1. https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/59121 - "No upgrade in progress" during upgrade tests - Ceph - Orchestrator 2. https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/59124 - "Health check failed: 1/3 mons down, quorum b,c (MON_DOWN)" during quincy p2p upgrade