On 9/2/19 11:53 AM, Zoltan Arnold Nagy wrote:
> On 2019-09-02 08:43, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>> On 9/1/19 9:51 PM, Zoltan Arnold Nagy wrote:
>>> On 2019-09-01 05:57, Konstantin Shalygin wrote:
On 8/31/19 4:14 PM, Zoltan Arnold Nagy wrote:
> Could you elaborate a bit more? upmap is
On 2019-09-02 08:43, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 9/1/19 9:51 PM, Zoltan Arnold Nagy wrote:
On 2019-09-01 05:57, Konstantin Shalygin wrote:
On 8/31/19 4:14 PM, Zoltan Arnold Nagy wrote:
Could you elaborate a bit more? upmap is used to map specific PGs to
specific OSDs
in order to deal with
On 9/1/19 9:51 PM, Zoltan Arnold Nagy wrote:
> On 2019-09-01 05:57, Konstantin Shalygin wrote:
>> On 8/31/19 4:14 PM, Zoltan Arnold Nagy wrote:
>>> Could you elaborate a bit more? upmap is used to map specific PGs to
>>> specific OSDs
>>> in order to deal with CRUSH inefficiencies.
>>>
>>> Why
On 2019-09-01 05:57, Konstantin Shalygin wrote:
On 8/31/19 4:14 PM, Zoltan Arnold Nagy wrote:
Could you elaborate a bit more? upmap is used to map specific PGs to
specific OSDs
in order to deal with CRUSH inefficiencies.
Why would I want to add a layer of indirection when the goal is to
On 8/31/19 4:14 PM, Zoltan Arnold Nagy wrote:
Could you elaborate a bit more? upmap is used to map specific PGs to
specific OSDs
in order to deal with CRUSH inefficiencies.
Why would I want to add a layer of indirection when the goal is to
remove the bucket
entirely?
As I understood you
On 2019-08-31 06:02, Konstantin Shalygin wrote:
On 8/31/19 3:42 AM, Zoltan Arnold Nagy wrote:
Originally our osd tree looked like this:
ID CLASS WEIGHT TYPE
NAME STATUS REWEIGHT PRI-AFF
-1 2073.15186 root default
-14 176.63100 rack s01-rack
-19
On 8/31/19 3:42 AM, Zoltan Arnold Nagy wrote:
Originally our osd tree looked like this:
ID CLASS WEIGHT TYPE NAME STATUS REWEIGHT
PRI-AFF
-1 2073.15186 root default
-14 176.63100 rack s01-rack
-19 176.63100 host s01
-15
