[ceph-users] Re: squid 19.2.0 QE validation status

The gibba cluster upgrade is complete! All looks good. On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 9:54 AM Laura Flores wrote: > Will do, @Rachana Patel . > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 3:44 AM Rachana Patel wrote: > >> Thanks Venky ! >> We can now focus on next tasks - >> >> - Release Notes >>https://

[ceph-users] Re: squid 19.2.0 QE validation status

Will do, @Rachana Patel . On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 3:44 AM Rachana Patel wrote: > Thanks Venky ! > We can now focus on next tasks - > > - Release Notes >https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/59539 . Requesting all TLs > to review Release notes. > - Gibba upgrade > - LRC upgrade > > @

[ceph-users] Re: squid 19.2.0 QE validation status

Thanks Venky ! We can now focus on next tasks - - Release Notes https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/59539 . Requesting all TLs to review Release notes. - Gibba upgrade - LRC upgrade @Laura Flores , Kindly upgrade cluster and share results. On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 1:03 AM Venky Sha

[ceph-users] Re: squid 19.2.0 QE validation status

On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 10:00 PM Laura Flores wrote: > Thanks @Venky Shankar for looking into > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/68002. > > As for https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/67999, you are right- it is not > cephfs related. Mistake on my part. After looking into this one, it seems > to be a

[ceph-users] Re: squid 19.2.0 QE validation status

Thanks @Venky Shankar for looking into https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/68002. As for https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/67999, you are right- it is not cephfs related. Mistake on my part. After looking into this one, it seems to be a test issue, where we check for a "Filestore has been deprecated" w

[ceph-users] Re: squid 19.2.0 QE validation status

Hey Laura, On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 12:13 AM Laura Flores wrote: > I have finished reviewing the upgrade and smoke suites. Most failures are > already known/tracked: > https://tracker.ceph.com/projects/rados/wiki/SQUID#v1920-build-3-httpstrackercephcomissues67779 > > *Upgrade: Pending check from

[ceph-users] Re: squid 19.2.0 QE validation status

Rados approved On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 1:43 PM Laura Flores wrote: > I have finished reviewing the upgrade and smoke suites. Most failures are > already known/tracked: > https://tracker.ceph.com/projects/rados/wiki/SQUID#v1920-build-3-httpstrackercephcomissues67779 > > *Upgrade: Pending check fr

[ceph-users] Re: squid 19.2.0 QE validation status

I have finished reviewing the upgrade and smoke suites. Most failures are already known/tracked: https://tracker.ceph.com/projects/rados/wiki/SQUID#v1920-build-3-httpstrackercephcomissues67779 *Upgrade: Pending check from FS team* Two fs issues stood out. @Gregory Farnum @Venky Shankar can you c

[ceph-users] Re: squid 19.2.0 QE validation status

Rados reviewed here: https://tracker.ceph.com/projects/rados/wiki/SQUID#v1920-build-3-httpstrackercephcomissues67779 I have asked @Radoslaw Zarzynski to take a look at the summary and confirm there are no blockers. In progress reviewing upgrade and smoke; will provide another update for those so

[ceph-users] Re: squid 19.2.0 QE validation status

Hey Rachana, Thanks for these links. Currently reviewing them and will update the thread soon. Thanks, Laura On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 1:06 AM Rachana Patel wrote: > Hi All ! > PR 59492 was cherry-picked on > top of the last built. RADOS, upgrade and sm

[ceph-users] Re: squid 19.2.0 QE validation status

Hi All ! PR 59492 was cherry-picked on top of the last built. RADOS, upgrade and smoke test suits were executed. Seeking approvals/reviews for following reruns RADOS Test Result

[ceph-users] Re: squid 19.2.0 QE validation status

We have added one more core PR to the release, which was deemed a blocker ( https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/59492). Rados, upgrade, and smoke will need to be reapproved. On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 3:59 PM Laura Flores wrote: > Upgrade suites approved: > https://tracker.ceph.com/projects/rados/wiki

[ceph-users] Re: squid 19.2.0 QE validation status

Upgrade suites approved: https://tracker.ceph.com/projects/rados/wiki/SQUID#v1920-httpstrackercephcomissues67779 On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 12:02 PM Adam King wrote: > orch approved, failures are known issues and not release blockers > > On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 10:43 AM Yuri Weinstein > wrote: > >

[ceph-users] Re: squid 19.2.0 QE validation status

orch approved, failures are known issues and not release blockers On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 10:43 AM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > Details of this release are summarized here: > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/67779#note-1 > > Release Notes - TBD > Gibba upgrade -TBD > LRC upgrade - TBD > > It was dec

[ceph-users] Re: squid 19.2.0 QE validation status

rgw — approved Eric (he/him) > On Aug 30, 2024, at 10:42 AM, Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > Details of this release are summarized here: > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/67779#note-1 > > Release Notes - TBD > Gibba upgrade -TBD > LRC upgrade - TBD > > It was decided and agreed upon that there

[ceph-users] Re: squid 19.2.0 QE validation status

Still looking at the rgw failures. One caught in rgw testing looks to be in core, a valgrind mismatched delete[] in libceph, and I think this squid PR is addressing: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/58991 Here's the valgrind error: https://qa-proxy.ceph.com/teuthology/yuriw-2024-08-29_20:04:

[ceph-users] Re: squid 19.2.0 QE validation status

Hi Yuri, (cc Rachana) On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 8:13 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > Details of this release are summarized here: > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/67779#note-1 > > Release Notes - TBD > Gibba upgrade -TBD > LRC upgrade - TBD > > It was decided and agreed upon that there would be li

[ceph-users] Re: squid 19.2.0 QE validation status

On Sat, Aug 31, 2024 at 12:43 AM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > Details of this release are summarized here: > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/67779#note-1 > > Release Notes - TBD > Gibba upgrade -TBD > LRC upgrade - TBD > > It was decided and agreed upon that there would be limited testing for > thi