I was wondering about performance differences between cephfs and rbd, so
I deviced this quick test. The results were pretty surprising to me.
The test: on a very idle machine, make 2 mounts. One is a cephfs mount,
the other an rbd mount. In each directory, copy a humongous .tgz file
(1.5 TB)
This may be too broad of a topic, or opening a can of worms, but we are
running a CEPH environment and I was wondering if there's any guidance
about this question:
Given that some group would like to store 50-100 TBs of data on CEPH and
use it from a linux environment, are there any
