Thanks Sage,
I wories about returned capacity when mounting CephFS.
but when disk is full, capacity will showed 50% or 100% Used?
On 07/16/2013 11:01 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013, Ta Ba Tuan wrote:
Hi everyone.
I have 83 osds, and every osds have same 2TB, (Capacity sumary is 166
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013, Ta Ba Tuan wrote:
> Hi everyone.
>
> I have 83 osds, and every osds have same 2TB, (Capacity sumary is 166TB)
> I'm using replicate 3 for pools ('data','metadata').
>
> But when mounting Ceph filesystem from somewhere (using: mount -t ceph
> Monitor_IP:/ /ceph -o name=admin,s
Apologies; I don't really understand the results. They're labeled "RBD
Device /dev/rbd/rbd/iscsi-image-part1 exported with tgt" and
"TGT-RBD connector". Is the former nothing to do with tgt (i.e., just
the kernel block device), and the latter is stgt/tgtd?
Do you interpret them to say the fir
Hi everyone.
I have 83 osds, and every osds have same 2TB, (Capacity sumary is 166TB)
I'm using replicate 3 for pools ('data','metadata').
But when mounting Ceph filesystem from somewhere (using: mount -t ceph
Monitor_IP:/ /ceph -o name=admin,secret=xx")
then/*capacity sumary is showed
Dear guys :
I have a ceph cluster which is used for backend storage of kvm guest, and
this cluster has four nodes, each node has three disks. And the ceph
version is 0.61.4.
Because of electrical power down, the ceph cluster have been shutdown
innormally several days ago. When I restarted
Hello,
Using db2bb270e93ed44f9252d65d1d4c9b36875d0ea5 I had observed some
disaster-alike behavior after ``pool create'' command - every osd
daemon in the cluster will die at least once(some will crash times in
a row after bringing back). Please take a look on the
backtraces(almost identical) below
ruleset 3 is:
rule iscsi {
ruleset 3
type replicated
min_size 1
max_size 10
step take iscsi
step chooseleaf firstn 0 type datacenter
step chooseleaf firstn 0 type host
step emit
}
2013/7/16 Vladislav Gorbunov :
> sorry, after i'm try
sorry, after i'm try to apply crush ruleset 3 (iscsi) to
pool iscsi:
ceph osd pool set iscsi crush_ruleset 3
2013/7/16 Vladislav Gorbunov :
>>Have you run this crush map through any test mappings yet?
> Yes, it worked on test cluster, and after apply map to main cluster.
> OSD servers downed after
>Have you run this crush map through any test mappings yet?
Yes, it worked on test cluster, and after apply map to main cluster.
OSD servers downed after i'm try to apply crush ruleset 3 (iscsi) to
pool iscsi:
ceph osd pool set data crush_ruleset 3
2013/7/16 Gregory Farnum :
> It's probably not th
It's probably not the same issue as that ticket, which was about the
OSD handling a lack of output incorrectly. (It might be handling the
output incorrectly in some other way, but hopefully not...)
Have you run this crush map through any test mappings yet?
-Greg
Software Engineer #42 @ http://inkt
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 1:30 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
wrote:
> Am 15.07.2013 10:19, schrieb Sylvain Munaut:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm curious what would be the official recommendation for when you
>> have multiple pools.
>> In total we have 21 pools and that lead to around 12000 PGs for only 24 OSD
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Sylvain Munaut
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>> I'd like the pool_id to be included in the hash used for the PG, to
>>> try and improve the data distribution. (I have 10 pool).
>>>
>>> I see that there is a flag named FLAG_HASHPSPOOL. Is it possible to
>>> enable it on existing
Hi Maciej -
We will be adding Jessie eventually, but probably not before it is officially
released. Current policy is to support the latest two releases of the distros.
We would welcome a patch for the cookbooks if you would like to submit one.
Thanks,
Gary
On Jul 13, 2013, at 6:08 AM, Maci
Tom Verdaat пишет:
>3. Is anybody doing this already and willing to share their experience?
Relative yes. Before ceph I was use drbd+ocfs2 (with o2cb stack), now both this
servers are inside of VM's with same ocfs2. There are same like over drbd, but
just remeber to turn rbd cache to "off" (R
Here's my results.
The performance test was seq write
On 15/07/13 10:12, Toni F. [ackstorm] wrote:
I'm going to do a performance test with fio to see the difference.
Regards
On 12/07/13 18:15, Dan Mick wrote:
Ceph performance is a very very complicated subject. How does that
compare to oth
Hi,
>> I'd like the pool_id to be included in the hash used for the PG, to
>> try and improve the data distribution. (I have 10 pool).
>>
>> I see that there is a flag named FLAG_HASHPSPOOL. Is it possible to
>> enable it on existing pool ?
>
> Hmm, right now there is not. :( I've made a ticket:
>
Am 15.07.2013 10:19, schrieb Sylvain Munaut:
> Hi,
>
> I'm curious what would be the official recommendation for when you
> have multiple pools.
> In total we have 21 pools and that lead to around 12000 PGs for only 24 OSDs.
>
> The 'data' and 'metadata' pools are actually unused, and then we hav
Hi,
I'm curious what would be the official recommendation for when you
have multiple pools.
In total we have 21 pools and that lead to around 12000 PGs for only 24 OSDs.
The 'data' and 'metadata' pools are actually unused, and then we have
9 pools of 'rgw' meta data ( .rgw, .rgw.control, .users.u
I'm going to do a performance test with fio to see the difference.
Regards
On 12/07/13 18:15, Dan Mick wrote:
Ceph performance is a very very complicated subject. How does that
compare to other access methods? Say, rbd import/export for an easy test?
On Jul 12, 2013 8:22 AM, "Toni F. [acks
19 matches
Mail list logo
