[re-added the ML]
On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 08:30:21 -0500 Brady Deetz wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 9:47 PM, Christian Balzer wrote:
>
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 09:24:46 -0500 Brady Deetz wrote:
> >
> > > I'd appreciate any critique on the following plan.
> > >
> > > Before I detail
Hi Christian,
yeah i saw the problems with cache tier in the current hammer.
But as far as i saw it, i would not get in touch with that szenarios. I
dont plan to change settings like that, to let it go rubbish.
But i already decided to wait for jewel and create a whole new cluster
and copy all d
We're parsing the output of 'ceph daemon osd.N perf dump' for the admin
sockets in /var/run/ceph/ceph-osd.*.asok on each node in our cluster.
We then push that data into carbon-cache/graphite and using grafana for
visualization.
Our numbers are much more consistent than yours appear.
Bob
On Thu,
Hi,I think you do not need do osd activate.
I always just use osd prepare,and it works well most time.
can you paste the output of these in host osd01:
df -h
ls -l /var/lib/ceph
I think everything works well but it do not create the directory of
/var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-0
and do not mount /dev/sdc
No trouble at all.
In the forthcoming Jewel release, there are additional optimizations on the
write path when object map is used. Specifically, if we know the object
doesn't exist, we can skip the initial guarded write (which we know will fail)
and directly read the corresponding extent from
Hi,
The notable changes since 10.1.0 are at:
http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/release-notes/#v10-1-1
and the Jewel release candidate information is at:
http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/release-notes/#v10-1-0-jewel-release-candidate
Cheers
On 07/04/2016 20:14, Sage Weil wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> W
Hi,
the intresting part is:
[osd01][WARNIN] INFO:ceph-disk:Running command: /usr/bin/ceph --cluster
ceph --name client.bootstrap-osd --keyring
/var/lib/ceph/bootstrap-osd/ceph.keyring auth add osd.0 -i
/var/lib/ceph/tmp/mnt.IkLtKp/keyring osd allow * mon allow profile osd
[osd01][WARNIN] Error E
On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 07:39:18 + Maxime Guyot wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 08/04/16 04:47, "ceph-users on behalf of Christian Balzer"
> wrote:
>
> >
> >> 11 OSD nodes:
> >> -SuperMicro 6047R-E1R36L
> >> --2x E5-2603v2
> >Vastly underpowered for 36 OSDs.
> >> --128GB RAM
> >> --36x 6TB OSD
> >> --2x
Hello,
On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 13:18:39 +0200 Oliver Dzombic wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> thank you for answering, i appriciate your time !
>
One thing that should be obvious but I forgot in the previous mail was
that of course you should probably wait for 0.94.7 or Jewel before doing
anything with
Hello,
On 08/04/16 04:47, "ceph-users on behalf of Christian Balzer"
wrote:
>
>> 11 OSD nodes:
>> -SuperMicro 6047R-E1R36L
>> --2x E5-2603v2
>Vastly underpowered for 36 OSDs.
>> --128GB RAM
>> --36x 6TB OSD
>> --2x Intel P3700 (journals)
>Which exact model?
>If it's the 400GB one, that's 2G
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 7:58 PM, gjprabu wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Thanks for your reply, current kernel version we are using
> 3.10.0-229.20.1.el7.x86_64 and ceph version 0.94.5 , Please advice which
> version is perfect.
>
3.10.0-227.el7 is about one year old. please use the newest el7 kernel.
11 matches
Mail list logo