Hi,
we have offers for ceph storage nodes with different SSD types and some
are already mentioned as a very good choice but some are total new to me.
May be you could give some feedback on the SSDs in question or provide
just small information which you primarily us?
Regarding the three disk in
*bump*
Am 01.07.2016 um 13:00 schrieb Micha Krause:
Hi,
> In Infernalis there was this command:
radosgw-admin regions list
But this is missing in Jewel.
Ok, I just found out that this was renamed to zonegroup list:
root@rgw01:~ # radosgw-admin --id radosgw.rgw zonegroup list
read_default
>>> Jake Young schrieb am Donnerstag, 30. Juni 2016
um 00:28:
> On Wednesday, June 29, 2016, Mike Jacobacci
wrote:
>
Hi,
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Is there anyone using rbd for xenserver vm storage? I have
XenServer 7
>> and the latest Ceph, I am looking for the the best way to mount the
rbd
>> volu
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 9:23 AM, Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we have offers for ceph storage nodes with different SSD types and some
> are already mentioned as a very good choice but some are total new to me.
>
> May be you could give some feedback on the SSDs in question o
Hello,
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 09:23:27 +0200 Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we have offers for ceph storage nodes with different SSD types and some
> are already mentioned as a very good choice but some are total new to me.
>
> May be you could give some feedback on the SSDs in qu
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Christian Balzer wrote:
>> Unfamiliar: Samsung SM863
>>
> You might want to read the thread here:
> http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/2016-February/007871.html
>
> And google "ceph SM863".
>
> However I'm still waiting for somebody to confirm that
On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 7:51 AM, Alex Gorbachev wrote:
>> Thank you Stefan and Campbell for the info - hope 4.7rc5 resolves this
>> for us - please note that my workload is purely RBD, no QEMU/KVM.
>> Also, we do not have CFQ turned on, neither scsi-mq and blk-mq, so I
>> am surmising ceph-osd must
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Dan van der Ster wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Christian Balzer wrote:
>>> Unfamiliar: Samsung SM863
>>>
>> You might want to read the thread here:
>> http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/2016-February/007871.html
>>
>> And google "ceph S
> -Original Message-
> From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of
> Alex Gorbachev
> Sent: 04 July 2016 20:50
> To: Campbell Steven
> Cc: ceph-users ; Tim Bishop li...@bishnet.net>
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Is anyone seeing iissues with
> task_numa_find_cpu
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Gorbachev [mailto:a...@iss-integration.com]
> Sent: 04 July 2016 22:00
> To: Nick Fisk
> Cc: Oliver Dzombic ; ceph-users us...@lists.ceph.com>; mq ; Christian Balzer
>
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users]
> suse_enterprise_storage3_rbd_LIO_vmware_performance_bad
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 10:22:37 +0200 Dan van der Ster wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Dan van der Ster
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Christian Balzer wrote:
> >>> Unfamiliar: Samsung SM863
> >>>
> >> You might want to read the thread here:
> >> http://lists.ceph.com/piperma
>>> Josef Johansson schrieb am Donnerstag, 30. Juni 2016 um
15:23:
> Hi,
>
Hi,
> You could actually managed every osd and mon and mds through docker swarm,
> since all just software it make sense to deploy it through docker where you
> add the disk that is needed.
>
> Mons does not need perm
On 04/07/16 11:22, Kenneth Waegeman wrote:
On 01/07/16 16:01, Yan, Zheng wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 6:59 PM, John Spray wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Kenneth Waegeman
wrote:
Hi all,
While syncing a lot of files to cephfs, our mds cluster got
haywire: the
mdss have a lot o
Yes, the socket will be created and will remain as long as librbd is
running -- in the case of QEMU, it should be available for as long as
the VM is running.
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Deneau, Tom wrote:
> Thanks, Jason--
>
> Turns out AppArmor was indeed enabled (I was not aware of that).
>
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 7:56 PM, Kenneth Waegeman
wrote:
>
>
> On 04/07/16 11:22, Kenneth Waegeman wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 01/07/16 16:01, Yan, Zheng wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 6:59 PM, John Spray wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Kenneth Waegeman
wrote:
>
>
> From: uker...@gmail.com
> Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 21:14:12 +0800
> To: kenneth.waege...@ugent.be
> CC: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] mds0: Behind on trimming (58621/30)
>
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 7:56 PM, Kenneth Waegeman
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 04/07/16 11:22, Kenneth W
Should you be interested, the solution to this was
ceph pg $pg mark_unfound_lost delete
for all pgs that had unfound objects, now the cluster is back in a healthy
state.
I think this is very counter-intuitive (why should totally unrelated pgs
be affected by this?!) but at least the solution was s
Hi,
What happened to the missing 2 OSD's?
53 osds: 51 up, 51 in
Thanks
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Matyas Koszik wrote:
>
> Should you be interested, the solution to this was
> ceph pg $pg mark_unfound_lost delete
> for all pgs that had unfound objects, now the cluster is back in a health
Hi,
The disks died, and were removed by:
ceph osd out $osd
ceph osd lost $osd
ceph osd crush remove $osd
ceph auth del $osd
ceph osd rm $osd
When writing my mails it was after the 'lost' or 'crush remove' step, not
sure. But even the last step didn't fix the issue. It was like this:
http://paste
Hey cephers,
Just a reminder that this month's Ceph Developer Monthly (originally
scheduled for tomorrow) will not be happening due to holidays, travel,
and other conflicts. If you have questions feel free to send them my
way. Thanks!
--
Best Regards,
Patrick McGarry
Director Ceph Community |
Thanks for the report; created a ticket and somebody will get on it
shortly. http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16592
-Greg
On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 5:55 PM, Bill Sharer wrote:
> I was working on a rolling upgrade on Gentoo to Jewel 10.2.2 from 10.2.0.
> However now I can't get a monitor quorum going
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Dzianis Kahanovich wrote:
> Gregory Farnum пишет:
>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Dzianis Kahanovich wrote:
>>> Upgraded infernalis->jewel (git, Gentoo). Upgrade passed over global
>>> stop/restart everything oneshot.
>>>
>>> Infernalis: e5165: 1/1/1 up {0=c=u
Hi,
The docker image is a new bootstrapped system with all the binaries
included. However, it's possible to let the docker have a whole device by
specifying the --device parameter and then it will survive a reboot or even
rebuild.
Regards,
Josef
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016, 12:28 Steffen Weißgerber, wro
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 11:05 PM, F21 wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I am interested in running ceph in docker containers. This is extremely
> attractive given the recent integration of swarm into the docker engine,
> making it really easy to set up a docker cluster.
>
> When running ceph in docker, should
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 09:23:27 +0200 Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we have offers for ceph storage nodes with different SSD types and some
> are already mentioned as a very good choice but some are total new to me.
>
> May be you could give some feedback on the SSDs in question or
Relevant USE flags FWIW
# emerge -pv ceph
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild R ~] sys-cluster/ceph-10.2.2::gentoo USE="fuse gtk jemalloc
ldap libaio libatomic nss radosgw static-libs xfs -babeltrace -cephfs
-cryptopp -debu
Hi Cephers,
I implemented Ceph with OpenStack.
Recently, I upgrade Ceph server from Hammer to Jewel.
Also, I plan to upgrade ceph clients that are OpenStack Nodes.
There are a lot of VMs running in Compute Nodes.
Should I restart the VMs after upgrade of Compute Nodes?
I recently started a process of using rbd snapshots to setup a backup regime
for a few file systems contained in RBD images. While this generally works
well at the time of the snapshots there is a massive increase in latency (10ms
to multiple seconds of rbd device latency) across the entire cl
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 3:28 PM, 한승진 wrote:
> Hi Cephers,
>
> I implemented Ceph with OpenStack.
>
> Recently, I upgrade Ceph server from Hammer to Jewel.
>
> Also, I plan to upgrade ceph clients that are OpenStack Nodes.
>
> There are a lot of VMs running in Compute Nodes.
>
> Should I restart the
Hi All...
Just to confirm that, after applying the patch and recompiling, we are
no longer seeing segfaults.
I just tested with a user application which would kill ceph-fuse almost
instantaneously. Now it is running for quite some time, reading and
updating the files that it should.
I sho
you can do a live migration to an upgraded host,
a new qemu process (with new librbd version) will be generated.
- Mail original -
De: "한승진"
À: "ceph-users"
Envoyé: Mercredi 6 Juillet 2016 07:28:02
Objet: [ceph-users] Should I restart VMs when I upgrade ceph client version
Hi Cephers
31 matches
Mail list logo
