On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 13:59:48 + Andrey Ptashnik wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> Is there any way to implement storage tiering in Ceph Jewel?
There is, you may want to re-read the documentation and the various
cache-tier posts here.
> I’ve read about different placing different pool on different perfor
Hello,
On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 12:19:07 -0700 Kane Kim wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was running cosbench for some time and noticed sharp consistent
> performance decrease at some point.
>
> Image is here: http://take.ms/rorPw
Unfortunately that statement and image is rather pointless without about a
met
Hello,
On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 11:44:15 +0200 Mateusz Skała wrote:
[snip]
> > > > >
> > > > There are a number of other options to control things, especially with
> > Jewel.
> > > > Also setting your cache mode to readforward might be a good idea
> > > > depending on your use case.
> > > >
> > > I'm
hi,
for a running VM, we have some snapshots on it.
For some snapshots, we protect it, clone it, and then flatten them.
If we run flatten frequently, does this influence the performance of
original running VM?
thanks.
___
ceph-users mailing list
cep
On 07/20/2016 11:52 AM, Jan Schermer wrote:
>
>> On 20 Jul 2016, at 18:38, Mike Christie wrote:
>>
>> On 07/20/2016 03:50 AM, Frédéric Nass wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Mike,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the update on the RHCS iSCSI target.
>>>
>>> Will RHCS 2.1 iSCSI target be compliant with VMWare ESXi client ? (or
On Wednesday, July 20, 2016, Jan Schermer wrote:
>
> > On 20 Jul 2016, at 18:38, Mike Christie > wrote:
> >
> > On 07/20/2016 03:50 AM, Frédéric Nass wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Mike,
> >>
> >> Thanks for the update on the RHCS iSCSI target.
> >>
> >> Will RHCS 2.1 iSCSI target be compliant with VMWare
Hello,
I was running cosbench for some time and noticed sharp consistent
performance decrease at some point.
Image is here: http://take.ms/rorPw
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
update:
After upgrading to Jewel and changing journaling to SSD, I no longer
have the slow/blocked requests warnings during normal data copying.
Thank you all.
Zhang Di
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:04 PM, Christian Balzer wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 22:47:05 -0500 Di Zhang
Hey cephers,
A reminder that our next Ceph Developer Monthly is coming up on 03 Aug
@ 12:30p EDT. Please visit the wiki and enter your blueprints for
discussion, even if it’s just a placeholder.
All major work being done on Ceph should have a blueprint at CDM, even
if it’s just a brief outline s
Hey cephers,
As of right now I have no one slated for the Ceph Tech Talk next week.
Unless I get someone into that slot by the end of this week or maybe
Monday at the latest, we’ll have to cancel the slot. If you’re
interested in giving a tech talk either this month or in the months to
come, pleas
> On 20 Jul 2016, at 18:38, Mike Christie wrote:
>
> On 07/20/2016 03:50 AM, Frédéric Nass wrote:
>>
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> Thanks for the update on the RHCS iSCSI target.
>>
>> Will RHCS 2.1 iSCSI target be compliant with VMWare ESXi client ? (or is
>> it too early to say / announce).
>
> No HA
On 07/20/2016 03:50 AM, Frédéric Nass wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> Thanks for the update on the RHCS iSCSI target.
>
> Will RHCS 2.1 iSCSI target be compliant with VMWare ESXi client ? (or is
> it too early to say / announce).
No HA support for sure. We are looking into non HA support though.
>
>
Hi,
I made a backup script to backup RBD images in the pool by snapshots and
exporting the
first snapshot and afterwards only the diffs.
I notices however that creating a diff from one image to the next is always
a certain size.
And its much bigger then only the changes from one snapshot to the n
Dear Ceph User,
I want to ask a very generic query regarding ceph.
Ceph does use .raw format. But every single company is providing qcow2
images.
It takes a lot of time to convert the images to raw format.
is it something everyone else is dealing with?
Or i am not doing something right.
Special
The Samba packages in Fedora 22+ do enable the Samba VFS:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1174412
>From what Ira said downthread, this is pretty experimental, so you
could run your tests on a Fedora system and see how it goes :)
- Ken
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Blair Bethwaite
wrote:
> Hi al
Do we have any tool to monitor the OSDs usage with help of UI?
Thanks
Swami
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 6:44 PM, M Ranga Swami Reddy
wrote:
> +1 .. I agree
>
> Thanks
> Swami
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Lionel Bouton
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 19/07/2016 13:06, Wido den Hollander wrote:
Hi,
currently there are two levels I know of: storage- and cachepool. From
our workload I do expect an third "level" of data, which will stay
currently in the storagepool as well.
Has anyone as we been thinking of data which could be moved even deeper
in that tiering, e.g. have SSD cache, fast lo
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 8:33 AM, gjprabu wrote:
>
> Hi Team,
>
>We are using chepfs file systems to mount client machines, here
> while mount we should provide monitoring ip address, is there any option to
> hide monitoring ips address in the mounted partition. We are using container
>
Thank You for quick response.
> -Original Message-
> From: Christian Balzer [mailto:ch...@gol.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 3:39 PM
> To: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> Cc: Mateusz Skała
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Cache Tier configuration
>
>
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 15:15
Hello,
On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 13:42:20 +1000 Goncalo Borges wrote:
> Hi All...
>
> Today we had a warning regarding 8 near full osd. Looking to the osds
> occupation, 3 of them were above 90%.
One would hope that this would have been picked up earlier, as in before
it even reaches near-full.
Ei
> -Original Message-
> From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of
> m13913886...@yahoo.com
> Sent: 20 July 2016 02:09
> To: Christian Balzer ; ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] how to use cache tiering with proxy in ceph-10.2.2
>
> But th
Hi all,
Just wondering if the original issue has been resolved. I have the same
problems with inconsistent nfs and samba directory listings. I'm running
Hammer.
Is it a confirmed seekdir bug in de kernel client?
On 01/14/2016 04:05 AM, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 3:37 AM, Mike Ca
Hi Mike,
Thanks for the update on the RHCS iSCSI target.
Will RHCS 2.1 iSCSI target be compliant with VMWare ESXi client ? (or is
it too early to say / announce).
Knowing that HA iSCSI target was on the roadmap, we chose iSCSI over NFS
so we'll just have to remap RBDs to RHCS targets when i
Hi community, 10 months ago, we discovered issue, after removing cache tier
from cluster with cluster HEALTH, and start email thread, as result - new
bug was created on tracker by Samuel Just
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12738
Till that time, i'm looking for good moment to upgrade (after fix was
Hi community, 10 months ago, we discovered issue, after removing cache tier
from cluster with cluster HEALTH, and start email thread, as result - new
bug was created on tracker by Samuel Just
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12738
Till that time, i'm looking for good moment to upgrade (after fix was
Hi Team,
We are using chepfs file systems to mount client machines, here
while mount we should provide monitoring ip address, is there any option to
hide monitoring ips address in the mounted partition. We are using container in
all ceph clients and which all able see monitoring
26 matches
Mail list logo
