By the way, we are using hammer version, 0.94.5.
-邮件原件-
发件人: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] 代表 许雪寒
发送时间: 2017年4月1日 13:13
收件人: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
主题: [ceph-users] CephX Authentication fails when only disable
"auth_cluster_required"
Hi, everyone.
According to
By the way, we are using hammer version, 0.94.5.
-邮件原件-
发件人: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] 代表 许雪寒
发送时间: 2017年4月1日 10:37
收件人: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
主题: [ceph-users] rbd expord-diff aren't counting AioTruncate op correctly
Hi, everyone.
Recently, in our test, we
Hi, everyone.
According to the documentation, “auth_cluster_required” means that “the Ceph
Storage Cluster daemons (i.e., ceph-mon, ceph-osd, and ceph-mds) must
authenticate with each other”. So, I guess if I only need to verify the client,
then "auth_cluster_required" doesn't need to be enable
I'm also trying to use lifecycles (via boto3) but i'm getting permission
denied trying to create the lifecycle. I'm bucket owner with full_control
and WRITE_ACP for good measure. Any ideas?
This is debug ms=20 debug radosgw=20
2017-03-31 21:28:18.382217 7f50d0010700 2 req 8:0.000693:s3:PUT
/be
Hello,
As part of the python-crush project, I am working on a feature to calculate
the available usable space in the pools of a cluster. The idea is to make
an accurate and conservative estimate that takes into account the exact PG
mappings as well as any other information that could help quantify
Trying to add a batch of OSD’s to my cluster, (Jewel 10.2.6, Ubuntu 16.04)
2 new nodes (ceph01,ceph02), 10 OSD’s per node.
I am trying to steer the OSD’s into a different root pool with crush location
set in ceph.conf with
> [osd.34]
> crush_location = "host=ceph01 rack=ssd.rack2 root=ssd"
>
>
Hi, everyone.
Recently, in our test, we found that there are VM images, that we exported from
the original cluster and imported to another cluster, whose images on those two
clusters are not the same.
The details of test is as follows: at first, we fully exported the VM's images
from the origi
Hi, we recently upgraded one of our Ceph clusters from Infernalis to Jewel.
The upgrade process went smoothly: Upgraded OSD's, restarted them in
batches, waited for health OK, updated Mon and MDS, restarted, waited for
heatlh OK, etc. We then set require_jewel_osds flag and upgraded our CephFS
clie
Hi,
when upgrading my cluster from 10.2.3 to 10.2.6 I've faced a major failure
and I think it could(?) be a bug.
My SO is Ubuntu (Xenial), Ceph packages are also from distro. My cluster
have 3 monitors and 96 OSDs.
First I stoped one mon, then upgrade SO packages, reboot, it came back on
as expe
f all
clients and the MDS (at log level 20) to
http://voms.simonsfoundation.org:50013/GTrbrMWDHb9F7CampXyYt5Ensdjg47w/ceph-20170331/
It essentially runs in a loop opening a file for read/write, reading from it
and closing it. The read/write open is key, if open the file read-only, the
problem doesn
And to address the other question, no, there is no per-snapshot accounting.
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 1:28 AM Frédéric Nass <
frederic.n...@univ-lorraine.fr> wrote:
> I just realized that Nick's post is only a few days old. Found the
> tracker : http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/19241
>
> Frederic.
>
Thanks John, that did the trick for ceph-fuse. But the kernel mount using
4.9.15 kernel still hangs. I guess I might need newer kernel ?
--
Deepak
-Original Message-
From: John Spray [mailto:jsp...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2017 1:19 AM
To: Deepak Naidu
Cc: ceph-users
Subject:
tem.
>
> The full test program is uploaded together with the verbose logs of all
> clients and the MDS (at log level 20) to
> http://voms.simonsfoundation.org:50013/GTrbrMWDHb9F7CampXyYt5Ensdjg47w/ceph-20170331/
> It essentially runs in a loop opening a file for read/write, reading f
On 31-3-2017 17:32, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> Hi Willem Jan,
>
>> Op 30 maart 2017 om 13:56 schreef Willem Jan Withagen
>> :
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm pleased to announce that my efforts to port to FreeBSD have
>> resulted in a ceph-devel port commit in the ports tree.
>>
>> https://www.freshpo
> Op 30 maart 2017 om 20:13 schreef Richard Hesse :
>
>
> Thanks for the reply Wido! How do you handle IPv6 routes and routing with
> IPv6 on public and cluster networks? You mentioned that your cluster
> network is routed, so they will need routes to reach the other racks. But
> you can't have
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 2:08 AM, Marius Vaitiekunas
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Luis Periquito
> wrote:
>>
>> But wasn't that what orphans finish was supposed to do?
>>
>
> orphans finish only removes search results from a log pool.
>
Right. The tool isn't removing objects (ye
Hi Willem Jan,
> Op 30 maart 2017 om 13:56 schreef Willem Jan Withagen :
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm pleased to announce that my efforts to port to FreeBSD have resulted
> in a ceph-devel port commit in the ports tree.
>
> https://www.freshports.org/net/ceph-devel/
>
Awesome work! I don't touch FreeBS
The exclusive-lock feature should only require grabbing the lock on
the very first IO, so if this is an issue that pops up after extended
use, it's either most likely not related to exclusive-lock or perhaps
you had a client<->OSD link hiccup. In the latter case, you will see a
log message like "im
Assuming you are asking about RBD-back VMs, it is not possible to
localize the all reads to the VM image. You can, however, enable
localization of the parent image since that is a read-only data set.
To enable that feature, set "rbd localize parent reads = true" and
populate the "crush location = h
any experiences ?
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Alejandro Comisario
wrote:
> Guys hi.
> I have a Jewel Cluster divided into two racks which is configured on
> the crush map.
> I have clients (openstack compute nodes) that are closer from one rack
> than to another.
>
> I would love to (if is p
MDS (at log level 20) to
http://voms.simonsfoundation.org:50013/GTrbrMWDHb9F7CampXyYt5Ensdjg47w/ceph-20170331/
It essentially runs in a loop opening a file for read/write, reading
from it and closing it. The read/write open is key, if open the file
read-only, the problem doesn't h
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Alexandre Blanca
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After prepare and activate my OSDs I create my cephFS :
>
> ceph fs new cephfs1 metadata1 data1
> new fs with metadata pool 11 and data pool 10
>
> ceph osd pool ls
> data1
> metadata1
>
> ceph fs ls
> name: cephfs1, metadata pool:
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Luis Periquito
wrote:
> But wasn't that what orphans finish was supposed to do?
>
>
orphans finish only removes search results from a log pool.
--
Marius Vaitiekūnas
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.
Hi,
After prepare and activate my OSDs I create my cephFS :
ceph fs new cephfs1 metadata1 data1
new fs with metadata pool 11 and data pool 10
ceph osd pool ls
data1
metadata1
ceph fs ls
name: cephfs1, metadata pool: metadata1, data pools: [data1 ]
ceph mds stat
e65: 1/1/1 up {0=sfd-serv1=up:c
I just realized that Nick's post is only a few days old. Found the
tracker : http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/19241
Frederic.
Le 31/03/2017 à 10:12, Frédéric Nass a écrit :
Hi,
Can we get the number of objects in a pool snapshot ? (That is how
much will be removed on snapshot removal)
We're
Hmm, now that I look, the --client_mds_namespace in jewel only took an integer.
So do "ceph fs dump", and use the number after the name of the
filesystem you want (e.g. where mine says "Filesystem 'cephfs_a' (1)",
I would use --client_mds_namespace=1).
John
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 9:41 PM, Deepa
Hi,
Can we get the number of objects in a pool snapshot ? (That is how much
will be removed on snapshot removal)
We're facing terrible performance issues due to snapshot removal in
Jewel. Nick warns about using "osd_snap_trim_sleep" in Jewel
(https://www.mail-archive.com/ceph-users@lists.ce
27 matches
Mail list logo
