Hi, All:
I am installing ceph in 2 node using ceph-deploy.
node1:monitor and osd.0,
ip:192.168.1.11
node2:osd.1,
ip:192.168.1.12
When I've configured node1 as monitor and osd.0, it ok.
But when I added node
Hi
is it possible to configure radosGW (10.2.6-0ubuntu0.16.04.1) to work
with Openstack Keystone UUID based tokens? RadosGW is expecting a list
of revoked tokens, but that option only works in keystone deployments
based on PKI token (not uuid/fernet tokens)
error log:
/2017-04-17 10:40:43.75
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 4:24 AM, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 5:39 AM, Alex Gorbachev
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Alex Gorbachev
>>> wrote:
Hi Ilya,
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 4:58 AM Ilya
Hi all.
Is there any way to create osd manually, which would use a designated partition
of the journal disk (without using ceph-ansible)?
I have journals on SSD disks nad each journal disk contains 3 partitions for 3
osds.
Example: one of the osds crashed. I changed a disk (sdaa) and want to pr
Nikita,
Take a look at
https://git.cybbh.space/vta/saltstack/tree/master/apps/ceph
Particularly files/init-journal.sh and files/osd-bootstrap.sh
We use salt to do some of the legwork (templatizing the bootstrap
process), but for the most part it is all just a bunch of shell scripts
with som
Any updates here?
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is intended only for the use and review of
the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the
intende
On Sat, 15 Apr 2017, Aaron Ten Clay wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Our cluster is experiencing a very odd issue and I'm hoping for some
> guidance on troubleshooting steps and/or suggestions to mitigate the issue.
> tl;dr: Individual ceph-osd processes try to allocate > 90GiB of RAM and are
> eventually nuk
Hey All,
I'm running a test of bluestore in a small VM and seeing 2x overhead
for each object. Here's the output of df detail:
GLOBAL:
SIZE AVAIL RAW USED %RAW USED OBJECTS
20378M 14469M5909M 29.00772k
POOLS:
NAMEID CA
A couple of questions:
1) What is your rack topology? Are all ceph nodes in the same rack
communicating with the same top of rack switch?
2) Why did you choose to run the ceph nodes on loopback interfaces as
opposed to the /24 for the "public" interface?
3) Are you planning on using RGW at all?
I'm just spitballing here, but what if you set osd crush update on start =
false ? Ansible would activate the OSD's but not place them in any
particular rack, working around the ceph.conf problem you mentioned. Then
you could place them in your CRUSH map by hand. I know you wanted to avoid
editing
Hi all,
I am looking at a way to scale performance and usable space using something
like Primary Affinity to effectively use 3x replication across 1 primary SSD
OSD, and 2 replicated HDD OSD’s.
Assuming production level, we would keep a pretty close 1:2 SSD:HDD ratio, but
looking to experiment
We are implementing an IPv6 native ceph cluster using SLAAC. We have some
legacy machines that are not capable of using IPv6, only IPv4 due to some
reasons (yeah, I know). I'm wondering what could happen if I use an
additional IPv4 on the radosgw in addition to the IPv6 that is already
running. The
12 matches
Mail list logo
