Re: [ceph-users] corrupted rbd filesystems since jewel

Hi, also i'm getting these errors only for pre jewel images: 2017-05-06 03:20:50.830626 7f7876a64700 -1 librbd::object_map::InvalidateRequest: 0x7f7860004410 invalidating object map in-memory 2017-05-06 03:20:50.830634 7f7876a64700 -1 librbd::object_map::InvalidateRequest: 0x7f7860004410 invalida

Re: [ceph-users] jewel - rgw blocked on deep-scrub of bucket index pg

Hi, On 06-05-17 20:08, Wido den Hollander wrote: >> Op 6 mei 2017 om 9:55 schreef Christian Balzer : >> >> >> >> Hello, >> >> On Sat, 6 May 2017 09:25:15 +0200 (CEST) Wido den Hollander wrote: >> Op 5 mei 2017 om 10:33 schreef Sam Wouters : Hi, we have a small cluste

Re: [ceph-users] CentOS 7 and ipv4 is trying to bind ipv6

> Op 6 mei 2017 om 20:00 schreef Peter Maloney > : > > > I was testing ceph in a centos 7 VM, just so I could support someone > that wants to use CentOS 7, and I ran into a problem... What am I doing > wrong? > > First I tried just without any ipv6 changes, and the eth0 had an ipv6 > address,

Re: [ceph-users] jewel - rgw blocked on deep-scrub of bucket index pg

> Op 6 mei 2017 om 9:55 schreef Christian Balzer : > > > > Hello, > > On Sat, 6 May 2017 09:25:15 +0200 (CEST) Wido den Hollander wrote: > > > > Op 5 mei 2017 om 10:33 schreef Sam Wouters : > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > we have a small cluster running on jewel 10.2.7; NL-SAS disks only

[ceph-users] CentOS 7 and ipv4 is trying to bind ipv6

I was testing ceph in a centos 7 VM, just so I could support someone that wants to use CentOS 7, and I ran into a problem... What am I doing wrong? First I tried just without any ipv6 changes, and the eth0 had an ipv6 address, but it still didn't work. I think it looked the same but didn't save th

[ceph-users] Ceph node failure

Hi all, I have a 3 nodes CEPH cluster, each node with 4 OSD and 1 monitor and replication across hosts defined in the crushmap. 2 pools (1 size=3, min-size=2 , 1 size=2 min-size 2) One of the nodes failed (hardware failure) so I removed it from the crush map and  change replication from host

Re: [ceph-users] jewel - rgw blocked on deep-scrub of bucket index pg

Hello, On Sat, 6 May 2017 09:25:15 +0200 (CEST) Wido den Hollander wrote: > > Op 5 mei 2017 om 10:33 schreef Sam Wouters : > > > > > > Hi, > > > > we have a small cluster running on jewel 10.2.7; NL-SAS disks only, osd > > data and journal co located on the disks; main purpose rgw secondary z

Re: [ceph-users] RGW: removal of support for fastcgi

> Op 5 mei 2017 om 21:51 schreef Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub : > > > RGW has supported since forever. Originally it was the only supported > frontend, and nowadays it is the least preferred one. > > Rgw was first developed over fastcgi + lighttpd, but there were some > issues with this setup, so we s

Re: [ceph-users] jewel - rgw blocked on deep-scrub of bucket index pg

> Op 5 mei 2017 om 10:33 schreef Sam Wouters : > > > Hi, > > we have a small cluster running on jewel 10.2.7; NL-SAS disks only, osd > data and journal co located on the disks; main purpose rgw secondary zone. > > Since the upgrade to jewel, whenever a deep scrub starts on one of the > rgw ind