Hi there,
Any plan for the release of 13.2.1?
--
Regards
Frank Yu
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
Hi everyone,
tl;dr: Please avoid the 12.2.6 packages that are currently present on
download.ceph.com. We will have a 12.2.7 published ASAP (probably
Monday).
If you do not use bluestore or erasure-coded pools, none of the issues
affect you.
Details:
We built 12.2.6 and pushed it to the re
Also, looking at your ceph-disk list output, the LVM is probably your
root filesystem and cannot be wiped. If you'd like the send the output
of a 'mount' and 'lvs' command, you should be able to to tell.
-- jacob
On 07/13/2018 03:42 PM, Jacob DeGlopper wrote:
You have LVM data on /dev/sd
You have LVM data on /dev/sdb already; you will need to remove that
before you can use ceph-disk on that device.
Use the LVM commands 'lvs','vgs', and 'pvs' to list the logical volumes,
volume groups, and physical volumes defined. Once you're sure you don't
need the data, lvremove, vgremove,
I am installing ceph in my lab box using ceph-ansible, i have two HDD
for OSD and i am getting following error on one of OSD not sure what
is the issue.
[root@ceph-osd-01 ~]# ceph-disk prepare --cluster ceph --bluestore /dev/sdb
ceph-disk: Error: Device /dev/sdb1 is in use by a device-mapper
map
Just a thought: have you considered rbd replication?
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 9:30 AM r...@cleansafecloud.com <
r...@cleansafecloud.com> wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> We have an old active Ceph cluster on Firefly (v0.80.9) which we use for
> OpenStack and have multiple live clients. We have been put
Hi Dan,
you're right, I was following the mimic instructions (which indeed
worked on my mimic testbed), but luminous is different and I missed the
additional step.
Works now, thanks!
Alessandro
Il 13/07/18 17:51, Dan van der Ster ha scritto:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 4:07 PM Alessandro
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 4:07 PM Alessandro De Salvo
wrote:
> However, I cannot reduce the number of mdses anymore, I was used to do
> that with e.g.:
>
> ceph fs set cephfs max_mds 1
>
> Trying this with 12.2.6 has apparently no effect, I am left with 2
> active mdses. Is this another bug?
Are yo
Hello folks,
We have an old active Ceph cluster on Firefly (v0.80.9) which we use for
OpenStack and have multiple live clients. We have been put in a position
whereby we need to move to a brand new cluster under a new OpenStack
deployment. The new cluster is on Luminous (v.12.2.5). Now we obvi
Thanks all,
100..inode, mds_snaptable and 1..inode were not
corrupted, so I left them as they were. I have re-injected all the bad
objects, for all mdses (2 per filesysytem) and all filesystems I had
(2), and after setiing the mdses as repaired my filesystems are back!
Howeve
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 11:39 PM Alessandro De Salvo
wrote:
>
> Some progress, and more pain...
>
> I was able to recover the 200. using the ceph-objectstore-tool for
> one of the OSDs (all identical copies) but trying to re-inject it just with
> rados put was giving no error while the g
Bluestore.
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018, 05:56 Dan van der Ster wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> Are your osds bluestore or filestore?
>
> -- dan
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 7:38 AM Adam Tygart wrote:
> >
> > I've hit this today with an upgrade to 12.2.6 on my backup cluster.
> > Unfortunately there were issues
Hi, all:
I am now looking at the mgr balancer module. How do the two algorithms in
it calculate? I just used ceph, the code reading ability is very poor. Can
anyone help me explain how to calculate the score of the data
balance?Especially `def calc_eval()` and `def calc_stats()`.
Best
___
The problem seems similar to https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/23871
which was fixed in mimic but not luminous:
fe5038c7f9 osd/PrimaryLogPG: clear data digest on WRITEFULL if skip_data_digest
.. dan
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 12:45 PM Dan van der Ster wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Following the reports on ceph-
Hi Kevin,
Are your OSDs bluestore or filestore?
-- dan
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 11:30 PM Kevin wrote:
>
> Sorry for the long posting but trying to cover everything
>
> I woke up to find my cephfs filesystem down. This was in the logs
>
> 2018-07-11 05:54:10.398171 osd.1 [ERR] 2.4 full-object rea
Hi Adam,
Are your osds bluestore or filestore?
-- dan
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 7:38 AM Adam Tygart wrote:
>
> I've hit this today with an upgrade to 12.2.6 on my backup cluster.
> Unfortunately there were issues with the logs (in that the files
> weren't writable) until after the issue struck.
You can keep the same layout as before. Most place DB/WAL combined in one
partition (similar to the journal on filestore).
Kevin
2018-07-13 12:37 GMT+02:00 Robert Stanford :
>
> I'm using filestore now, with 4 data devices per journal device.
>
> I'm confused by this: "BlueStore manages either
Hi,
Following the reports on ceph-users about damaged cephfs after
updating to 12.2.6 I spun up a 1 node cluster to try the upgrade.
I started with two OSDs on 12.2.5, wrote some data.
Then I restarted the OSDs one by one while continuing to write to the
cephfs mountpoint.
Then I restarted the (si
I'm using filestore now, with 4 data devices per journal device.
I'm confused by this: "BlueStore manages either one, two, or (in certain
cases) three storage devices."
(
http://docs.ceph.com/docs/luminous/rados/configuration/bluestore-config-ref/
)
When I convert my journals to bluestore, wil
This is what leads me to believe it's other settings being referred to as
well:
https://ceph.com/community/new-luminous-rados-improvements/
*"There are dozens of documents floating around with long lists of Ceph
configurables that have been tuned for optimal performance on specific
hardware or fo
Hi,
Inkscope, a ceph admin and monitoring GUI, is still alive.
It can be now installed with an ansible playbook.
https://github.com/inkscope/inkscope-ansible
Best regards
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ghislain Chevalier
ORANGE/IMT/OLS/DIESE/LCP/DDSD
Software-Defined Storage Architect
+3329
Konstantin, Thanks for explanation. But unfortunately, upgrading qemu is
nearly impossible in my case.
So is there something else I can do, or I have to agree with fact that
write IOPS had to be 8x smaller inside KVM rather than outside KVM? :|
pt., 13 lip 2018 o 04:22 Konstantin Shalygin napisa
Hi Kevin,
Am 13.07.2018 um 04:21 schrieb Kevin:
> That thread looks exactly like what I'm experiencing. Not sure why my
> repeated googles didn't find it!
maybe the thread was still too "fresh" for Google's indexing.
>
> I'm running 12.2.6 and CentOS 7
>
> And yes, I recently upgraded from j
23 matches
Mail list logo
