On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 3:59 AM Florent B wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I'm not running multiple active MDS (1 active & 7 standby).
> I know about debug_mds 20, is it the only log you need to see bugs ?
>
> On 16/10/2018 18:32, Sergey Malinin wrote:
> > Are you running multiple active MDS daemons?
> > On MDS
To Zheng Yan:
I'm wondering whether 'session reset' implies the below?
> On 18.10.2018, at 02:18, Alfredo Daniel Rezinovsky
> wrote:
>
>rados -p cephfs_metadata rm mds0_openfiles.0
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
In my case I was able to bring up the fs successfully after resetting
sessions+journal and scanning links using cephfs-data-scan tool.
> On 18.10.2018, at 02:18, Alfredo Daniel Rezinovsky
> wrote:
>
> Didnt work for me. Downgraded and mds won't start.
>
> I also needed to:
>
>rados -p
Didnt work for me. Downgraded and mds won't start.
I also needed to:
rados -p cephfs_metadata rm mds0_openfiles.0
or else mds daemon crashed.
The crash info didn't show any useful information (for me). I couldn't
figure this out without Zheng Yan help.
On 17/10/18 17:36, Paul Emmerich
The problem is caused by unintentional change of on-disk format of MDS purge
queue. If you have upgraded and didn't hit the bug -- that probably means your
MDS daemon was deployed after the upgrade, otherwise it wouldn't start.
> On 18.10.2018, at 02:08, Виталий Филиппов wrote:
>
> I mean,
I mean, does every upgraded installation hit this bug, or do some upgrade
without any problem?
The problem occurs after upgrade, fresh 13.2.2 installs are not affected.
--
With best regards,
Vitaliy Filippov
___
ceph-users mailing list
The problem occurs after upgrade, fresh 13.2.2 installs are not affected.
> On 17.10.2018, at 23:42, Виталий Филиппов wrote:
>
> By the way, does it happen with all installations or only under some
> conditions?
>
>> CephFS will be offline and show up as "damaged" in ceph -s
>> The fix is to
By the way, does it happen with all installations or only under some
conditions?
CephFS will be offline and show up as "damaged" in ceph -s
The fix is to downgrade to 13.2.1 and issue a "ceph fs repaired "
command.
Paul
--
With best regards,
Vitaliy Filippov
CephFS will be offline and show up as "damaged" in ceph -s
The fix is to downgrade to 13.2.1 and issue a "ceph fs repaired " command.
Paul
Am Mi., 17. Okt. 2018 um 21:53 Uhr schrieb Michael Sudnick
:
>
> What exactly are the symptoms of the problem? I use cephfs with 13.2.2 with
> two active
What exactly are the symptoms of the problem? I use cephfs with 13.2.2 with
two active MDS daemons and at least on the surface everything looks fine.
Is there anything I should avoid doing until 13.2.3?
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018, 14:10 Patrick Donnelly wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 11:05 AM
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 3:23 PM Paul Emmerich wrote:
>
> John Spray :
> >
> > Apologies if this has been asked before, but how are you building
> > these, some third party compiler backport? If there isn't anything
> > too hacky involved in the build perhaps your packages could simply be
> > the
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 11:05 AM Alexandre DERUMIER wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to have more infos or announce about this problem ?
>
> I'm currently waiting to migrate from luminious to mimic, (I need new quota
> feature for cephfs)
>
> is it safe to upgrade to 13.2.2 ?
>
> or better to
Hi,
Is it possible to have more infos or announce about this problem ?
I'm currently waiting to migrate from luminious to mimic, (I need new quota
feature for cephfs)
is it safe to upgrade to 13.2.2 ?
or better to wait to 13.2.3 ? or install 13.2.1 for now ?
--
Alexandre
- Mail
It's also possible to install ubuntu xenial packages on stretch,
but this need the old libssl1.0.0 package (you can install manually the deb
from jessie)
- Mail original -
De: "Hervé Ballans"
À: "ceph-users"
Envoyé: Mercredi 17 Octobre 2018 11:21:14
Objet: [ceph-users] Mimic and
Hi everyone,
OSS Europe is happening in Edinburgh next week, and on Monday there'll
be a Ceph BoF session[1] at 18:00. This is an informal session for
Ceph users and developers to meet up and talk about whatever's on our
collective mind.
Hope to see you there!
Thanks,
John
1.
Hi,
On 10/17/2018 04:04 PM, John Spray wrote:
> If there isn't anything
> too hacky involved in the build perhaps your packages could simply be
> the official ones?
being a Debian Developer, I can upload my backports that I maintain/use
at work to e.g. people.debian.org/~daniel or so. Given time
John Spray :
>
> Apologies if this has been asked before, but how are you building
> these, some third party compiler backport? If there isn't anything
> too hacky involved in the build perhaps your packages could simply be
> the official ones?
There are two problems:
1. The build system is
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 2:37 PM Paul Emmerich wrote:
>
> I wouldn't hold my breath for an official Stretch release.
>
> We are running several Mimic clusters in production with Debian, our
> Stretch packages are available at our mirror:
>
> https://croit.io/2018/09/23/2018-09-23-debian-mirror
I wouldn't hold my breath for an official Stretch release.
We are running several Mimic clusters in production with Debian, our
Stretch packages are available at our mirror:
https://croit.io/2018/09/23/2018-09-23-debian-mirror
Paul
Am Mi., 17. Okt. 2018 um 11:21 Uhr schrieb Hervé Ballans
:
>
>
Hi,
I have a similar issue, and created a simple bash file to delete old
indexes (it is PoC and have not been tested on production):
for bucket in `radosgw-admin metadata list bucket | jq -r '.[]' | sort`
do
actual_id=`radosgw-admin bucket stats --bucket=${bucket} | jq -r '.id'`
for
Hi,
I just wanted to know if we had a chance soon to install Mimic on Debian
9 ?! ;)
I know there is a problem with the required version gcc (compatible with
c++17) that is not yet backported on current stable version of Debian,
but is there any news on this side ?
Regards,
Hervé
My idea was the setting, which disables encryption on rgw, so rgw anounces, it
doesn't support it (I don't know how client and server are comunicating this
now, so maybe I am oversimplyfing it).
Anyway, workaround with rgw_crypt_s3_kms_encryption_keys looks great.
Thank you!
Hi,
A few weeks ago I found radosgw index has been inconsistent with
reality. Some object I can not list, but I can get them by key. Please see
the details below:
*BACKGROUND：*
Ceph version 12.2.4 (52085d5249a80c5f5121a76d6288429f35e4e77b) luminous
(stable)
Index pool is on ssd.
23 matches
Mail list logo
