Hello - We have seen the ceph-mon election is taking time or cause some
issues when a mon leader down or during the maintenance.
So in this case - spl. during the maintaince - its required that -
ceph-mon leader set via CLI and do the maintenance for ceph-mon node.
This functionality very much u
Hi, from what we're seeing although Ceph permit to include other public
networks it's seems that implementation is not fully operational
(mimic), and we need to route all traffic from client to OSD through the
first network, for now we leave this approximation and use only one
public network to acc
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 10:17:31AM +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> It's http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/37977. Thanks for your help.
>
I think I've hit this bug. Ceph MDS using 100% ceph and reporting as
laggy and being kicked out. I'm not sure though if this fix is currently
in a released version of L
Hi!
I just tried upgrading my test cluster from Mimic (13.2.5) to Nautilus
(14.2.0), and everything looked fine. Until I activated msgr2. At that
moment, one of my three MONs (the then active one) fell out of the
quorum and refuses to join back. The two other MONs seem to work fine.
ceph-mon
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 6:36 PM Mark Schouten wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 10:17:31AM +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> > It's http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/37977. Thanks for your help.
> >
>
> I think I've hit this bug. Ceph MDS using 100% ceph and reporting as
> laggy and being kicked out. I'm n
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 07:13:20PM +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> Yes. the fix is in 12.2.11
Great, thanks.
--
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 0318 200208 | i...@tuxis.nl
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph
Hi again!
moment, one of my three MONs (the then active one) fell out of the
"active one" is of course nonsense, I confused it with MGRs. Which are
running okay, btw, on the same three hosts.
I reverted the MON back to a snapshot (vSphere) before the upgrade,
repeated the upgrade, and ende
Did you check port access from other nodes? My guess is a forgotten firewall
re-emerged on that node after reboot.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 25, 2019, at 07:26, Clausen, Jörn wrote:
>
> Hi again!
>
>> moment, one of my three MONs (the then active one) fell out of the
>
> "active one" i
Hi!
Am 25.03.2019 um 15:07 schrieb Brian Topping:
Did you check port access from other nodes? My guess is a forgotten firewall
re-emerged on that node after reboot.
I am pretty sure it's not the firewall. To be extra sure, I switched it
off for testing.
I found this in the mon-logs:
On t
Hello folks,
Nobody to give me a hint ?
The communication and auth with mon is ok
2019-03-25 14:16:25.342 7fa3af260700 1 -- 10.8.33.158:6789/0 <== osd.0
10.8.33.183:6800/293177 184 auth(proto 2 2 bytes epoch 0) v1 32+0+0
(2260890001 0 0) 0x559759ffd680 con 0x55975548700
0
2019-03-25
Hi all,
I'm excited to announce that we will have a booth at SUSECON 2-4 2019!
https://www.susecon.com
Thank you to SUSE for providing the Ceph Foundation space to allow
developers and users of Ceph to showcase demos, and an area to meet
for questions and discussions.
If you can join the confer
I noticed my cluster has scrub errors but the deep-scrub command doesn't
show any errors. Is there any way to know what it takes to fix it?
# ceph health detail
HEALTH_ERR 1 pgs inconsistent; 47 scrub errors
pg 10.2a is active+clean+inconsistent, acting [41,38,8]
47 scrub errors
# zgrep 10.2a
It would help to know what version you are running but, to begin with,
could you post the output of the following?
$ sudo ceph pg 10.2a query
$ sudo rados list-inconsistent-obj 10.2a --format=json-pretty
Also, have a read of
http://docs.ceph.com/docs/mimic/rados/troubleshooting/troubleshooting-pg
hi, thanks. Its still using Hammer. Here's the output from the pg query,
the last command you gave doesn't work at all but be too old.
# ceph pg 10.2a query
{
"state": "active+clean+inconsistent",
"snap_trimq": "[]",
"epoch": 23265,
"up": [
41,
38,
8
Hammer is no longer supported.
What's the status of osds 7 and 17?
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 8:56 AM solarflow99 wrote:
>
> hi, thanks. Its still using Hammer. Here's the output from the pg query,
> the last command you gave doesn't work at all but be too old.
>
>
> # ceph pg 10.2a query
> {
>
yes, I know its old. I intend to have it replaced but thats a few months
away and was hoping to get past this. the other OSDs appear to be ok, I
see them up and in, why do you see something wrong?
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 4:00 PM Brad Hubbard wrote:
> Hammer is no longer supported.
>
> What's t
forgive me, it's my mistake - -
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 4:28 PM Frank Yu wrote:
> Hi guys，
>
> I have try to setup a cluster with this version, I found the mgr
> prometheus metrics has been changed a lot compared with version 13.2.x.
> e.g: there is no ceph_mds_* related metrics, or there is so
17 matches
Mail list logo
