Hey all.
wondering if anyone has a set of kernel settings they run on larger density
setups. 24->36 disks per node.
we have run into and resolved the PID issue, just wondering if there any
anything else we may be seeing we dont know about yet.
Thanks
Daniel
_
Is there a way to shrink/merge PG's on a pool without removing it?
I have a pool with some data in it but the PG's were miscalculated and just
wondering the best way to resolve it.
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Somnath Roy wrote:
> Sorry, I didn’t read through all..It seems you have 6 OSDs,
Any updates on when this is going to be released?
Daniel
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 3:51 AM, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub
wrote:
> Yes, so it seems. The librados::nobjects_begin() call expects at least a
> Hammer (0.94) backend. Probably need to add a try/catch there to catch this
> issue, and maybe see i
Hi All.
We have a wierd issue where civetweb just locks up, it just fails to
respond to HTTP and a restart resolves the problem. This happens anywhere
from every 60 seconds to every 4 hours with no reason behind it.
We have run the gateway in full debug mode and there is nothing there that
seems
Thanks.
Can you please let me know the suitable/best git version/tree to be pulling
to compile and use this feature/patch?
Thanks
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 4:38 AM, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub
wrote:
>
>
> --
>
> *From: *"Daniel Hoffman"
>
Hi All.
We are trying to cope with radosGW crashing every 5-15mins. This seems to
be getting worse and worse but we are unable to determine the cause,
nothing in the logs as it appears to be a radosgw hang.
The port is open, accepts a connect but there is no response to a HEAD/GET
etc etc.
We ar
Hi All.
We are trying to cope with radosGW crashing every 5-15mins. This seems to
be getting worse and worse but we are unable to determine the cause,
nothing in the logs as it appears to be a radosgw hang.
The port is open, accepts a connect but there is no response to a HEAD/GET
etc etc.
We ar
Has anyone come accross a problem with multi-object deletes.
We have a number of systems that send we think are sending big piles of
POST/XML and multi-object deletes.
Has anyone had any experience with this locking up civetweb or
apache/fast_cgi threads. Are there any tunable settings we could u
Hi All.
Running a Ceph Cluster (firefly) ceph version 0.80.5
We use ceph mainly for backups via the radosGW at the moment.
There had to be an account deleted/bucket removed which had a very large
number of objects and was about 60TB in space.
We have been monitoring it for days now, and the
No one had this problem? I found a forum/mail list post from 2013 with
the same issue but no responses either.
Any pointers appreciated.
Daniel
On 2014-11-14 20:20, Daniel Hoffman wrote:
Hi All.
Running a Ceph Cluster (firefly) ceph version 0.80.5
We use ceph mainly for backups via the
removal of the newly deleted objects
way quicker.
Keep us posted to tell us if it has improved anything.
JC
On Nov 14, 2014, at 01:20, Daniel Hoffman wrote:
Hi All.
Running a Ceph Cluster (firefly) ceph version 0.80.5
We use ceph mainly for backups via the radosGW at the moment.
There
essor cycle time
You may want to reduce the gc cycle time (and match the total run time
also).
Yehuda
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 3:23 AM, Daniel Hoffman
wrote:
Thanks.
We have that set
rgw gc max objs = 997
The problem we have is we have Commvault connected to the cluster.
What
commvault do
`;
echo $diff ; done
595
607
606
On 2014-11-16 11:15, Daniel Hoffman wrote:
We have managed to get it running with below.
rgw gc max objs = 7877
rgw gc processor period = 600
We now have a higher IOPs number on the GC pool in the dashboard. We
are not sure if its making a huge differenc
Hi All.
I have a legacy server farm made up of 7 nodes running KVM and using
LVM(LVs) for the disks of the virtual machines. The nodes at this time are
CentOS 6.
We would love to remove this small farm from our network and use CephRBD
over using a traditional iSCSI block device as we currently do
14 matches
Mail list logo
