Thanks.. I'll give this a shot and we'll see what happens!
jonathan
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 8:47 AM Yan, Zheng wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 9:05 PM Jonathan Woytek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 7:12 AM Yan, Zheng wrote:
> >>
> >&g
h changing contents, of
course) and will be pretty easy to distribute amongst the mds with pinning,
but then there are a handful of other directories that exist, some of which
are created or destroyed at different times.
jonathan
--
Jonathan Woytek
http://www.dryrose.com
KB3HOZ
PGP: 462C 5F
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 4:34 PM Patrick Donnelly wrote:
> Hello Jonathan,
>
> On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 5:37 AM Jonathan Woytek wrote:
> > While working on examining performance under load at scale, I see a
> marked performance improvement whenever I would restart certain mds
>
re a few cache
options, too, that I want to understand.
I know this is long, but hopefully it makes sense and someone can give me a
few pointers. If you need additional information to comment, please feel
free to ask!
--
Jonathan Woytek
http://www.dryrose.com
KB3HOZ
PGP: 462C 5F50 144D 6B09 3B6
,
> Mosi
> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
--
Jonathan Woytek
http://www.dryrose.com
KB3HOZ
PGP: 462C 5F50 144D 6B09 3B65 FCE8 C1DC DEC4 E8B6 AABC
On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 9:29 AM David Turner wrote:
> I second that you do not have nearly enough RAM in these servers and I
> don't you have at least 72 CPU cores either which means you again don't
> have the minimum recommendation for the amount of OSDs you have, let alone
> everything else. I
ndle, and
never released any of it until it was killed.
jonathan
--
Jonathan Woytek
http://www.dryrose.com
KB3HOZ
PGP: 462C 5F50 144D 6B09 3B65 FCE8 C1DC DEC4 E8B6 AABC
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
, and restarted all
four mds daemons. The cluster is back to healthy again.
I've got more stuff to write up on our end for recovery procedures now, and
that's a good thing! Thanks again!
jonathan
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 11:12 PM, Jonathan Woytek
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2018
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 11:02 PM Yan, Zheng wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 10:55 AM Jonathan Woytek
> wrote:
> >
> > ceph version 13.2.0 (79a10589f1f80dfe21e8f9794365ed98143071c4) mimic
> (stable)
> >
> >
>
> Try deleting mds0_openfiles.0 (mds1_openf
ceph version 13.2.0 (79a10589f1f80dfe21e8f9794365ed98143071c4) mimic (stable)
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 10:51 PM, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 10:50 AM Jonathan Woytek wrote:
>>
>> Actually, I missed it--I do see the wipe start, wipe done in the log.
>> Howev
Actually, I missed it--I do see the wipe start, wipe done in the log.
However, it is still doing verify_diri_backtrace, as described
previously.
jonathan
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 10:42 PM, Jonathan Woytek wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 9:40 PM, Yan, Zheng wrote:
>> How many client re
not seeing any reference to 'wipe',
so I'm not sure if it is being honored. Am I putting that in the right
place?
jonathan
--
Jonathan Woytek
http://www.dryrose.com
KB3HOZ
PGP: 462C 5F50 144D 6B09 3B65 FCE8 C1DC DEC4 E8B6 AABC
___
c
s when we detect it missing.
Is there anything I can do to make this more efficient or help to get the
process completed so MDS goes online?
jonathan
--
Jonathan Woytek
http://www.dryrose.com
KB3HOZ
PGP: 462C 5F50 144D 6B09 3B65 FCE8 C1DC DEC4 E8B6 AABC
13 matches
Mail list logo
