Hi, Casey.
Can you help me with my question?
From: Konstantin Shalygin
Date: Wednesday, 26 June 2019 at 07:29
To: Rudenko Aleksandr
Cc: "ceph-users@lists.ceph.com" , Casey Bodley
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] RGW: Is 'radosgw-admin reshard stale-instances rm'
safe?
.
From: Konstantin Shalygin
Date: Friday, 21 June 2019 at 15:30
To: Rudenko Aleksandr
Cc: "ceph-users@lists.ceph.com"
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] RGW: Is 'radosgw-admin reshard stale-instances rm'
safe?
Hi, folks.
I have Luminous 12.2.12. Auto-resharding is enabled.
In st
Hi, folks.
I have Luminous 12.2.12. Auto-resharding is enabled.
In stale instances list I have:
# radosgw-admin reshard stale-instances list | grep clx
"clx:default.422998.196",
I have the same marker-id in bucket stats of this bucket:
# radosgw-admin bucket stats --bucket clx | grep marke
Hi, guys.
I made a few tests and i see that performance is better if
osd_journal_aio=false for LV-journals.
Setup:
2 servers x 4 OSD (SATA HDD + journal on SSD LV)
12.2.5, filestore
cluster:
id: ce305aae-4c56-41ec-be54-529b05eb45ed
health: HEALTH_OK
services:
mon: 2 daemons
rsion of graylog/ceph do you use?
Thanks,
Roman
On Aug 9 2018, at 7:47 pm, Rudenko Aleksandr
mailto:arude...@croc.ru>> wrote:
Hi,
All our settings for this:
mon cluster log to graylog = true
mon cluster log to graylog host = {graylog-server-hostname}
On 9 Aug 2018, at 19:33, Roma
er. We
didn't update any packages for months.
Regards
[1] https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/23352
Zitat von Rudenko Aleksandr mailto:arude...@croc.ru>>:
Hi, guys.
After upgrade on Luminous i see:
Monitor daemon marked osd.xx down, but it is still running
this happens 3-5 times a day
Hi,
All our settings for this:
mon cluster log to graylog = true
mon cluster log to graylog host = {graylog-server-hostname}
On 9 Aug 2018, at 19:33, Roman Steinhart
mailto:ro...@aternos.org>> wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to set up ceph logging into graylog.
For that I've set the following o
Hi, guys.
After upgrade on Luminous i see:
Monitor daemon marked osd.xx down, but it is still running
this happens 3-5 times a day on different OSDs.
I spent a lot of time on debug but i haven’t found problem.
Network works perfectly. CPU, network and disk utilization is low. Memory is
enough
redmo...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi,
Do you have on going resharding? 'radosgw-admin reshard list' should so you the
status.
Do you see the number of objects in .rgw.bucket.index pool increasing?
I hit a lot of problems trying to use auto resharding in 12.2.5 - I have
disabled it fo
Hi, guys.
I use Luminous 12.2.5.
Automatic bucket index resharding has not been activated in the past.
Few days ago i activated auto. resharding.
After that and now i see:
- very high Ceph read I/O (~300 I/O before activating resharding, ~4k now),
- very high Ceph read bandwidth (50 MB/s befor
Hi, friends.
I updated cluster from Hammer(0.94.10) to Jewel(10.2.10) recently an all works
fine.
Now, i can't update cluster from Jewel to Luminous(12.2.5).
I have 5 MONs.
I updated packages, restarted MON service but MON didn't joined to cluster.
In logs of new MON i see:
7f53bc797700 0 -
Hi, friends.
We use RGW user stats in our billing.
Example on Luminous:
radosgw-admin usage show --uid 5300c830-82e2-4dce-ac6d-1d97a65def33
{
"entries": [
{
"user": "5300c830-82e2-4dce-ac6d-1d97a65def33",
"buckets": [
{
"bu
Hi, Sean.
Thank you for the reply.
What does it mean: “We had to disable "rgw dns name" in the end”?
"rgw_dns_name": “”, has no effect for me.
On 29 Mar 2018, at 11:23, Sean Purdy
mailto:s.pu...@cv-library.co.uk>> wrote:
We had something similar recently. We had to disable "rgw dns name" i
Thank you Vincent, it’s very helpfull for me!
On 11 Jan 2018, at 14:24, Vincent Godin
mailto:vince.ml...@gmail.com>> wrote:
As no response were given, i will explain what i found : maybe it
could help other people
.dirXXX object is an index marker with a 0 data size. The metadata
associate
Hi friends.
I'm sorry, maybe it isn't bug, but i don't know how to solve this problem.
I know that absolute URIs are supported in civetweb and it works fine for me
without haproxy in the middle.
But if client send absolute URIs through reverse proxy(haproxy) to civetweb,
civetweb breaks conn
Hi,
I have the same issue.
Try to use two underscores:
radosgw-admin user info --uid=“__pro_"
I have user with two underscores on hammer and i can work with him with one
underscore:)
I recommend you remove this user and not use underscore in user names and
access_keys because after upgrade o
Hi friends,
I have rgw-user (_sc) with with the same access key:
radosgw-admin metadata user info --uid _sc
{
"user_id": "_sc",
"display_name": "_sc",
"email": "",
"suspended": 0,
"max_buckets": 0,
"auid": 0,
"subusers": [],
"keys": [
{
"user":
00 2 req 22:0.000264:s3:OPTIONS
/aaa:options_cors:http status=403
2017-10-23 10:51:25.302203 7f39f2e73700 1 == req done req=0x7f39f2e6d190
op status=-13 http_status=403 ==
2017-10-23 10:51:25.302260 7f39f2e73700 1 civetweb: 0x7f3a30c7c000:
172.20.41.101 - - [23/Oct/2017:10:51:25
Hi guys,
We use Ceph as S3-compatible object store and we have our self-development
web-interface for our customers on different domain.
Now we use Hammer(FCGI + Apache as RGW frontend) but we have plans for upgrade
Ceph from hammer to luminous.
In luminous release FCGI frontend was dropped an
Hi,
Maybe someone have thoughts?
---
Best regards,
Alexander Rudenko
On 30 Aug 2017, at 12:28, Rudenko Aleksandr
mailto:arude...@croc.ru>> wrote:
Hi,
I use ceph 0.94.10(hammer) with radosgw as S3-compatible object store.
I have few objects in some bucket with strange problem.
Hi,
I use ceph 0.94.10(hammer) with radosgw as S3-compatible object store.
I have few objects in some bucket with strange problem.
I use awscli as s3 client.
GET/HEAD objects work fine but list object doesn’t.
In objects list I don’t see these objects.
Object metadata:
radosgw-admin bi list -
21 matches
Mail list logo
