[ceph-users] can anyone tell me why to separate bucket name and instance

Dear All according commit c3260b276882beedb52f7c77c622a9b77537a63f, bucket info resides in an instance specific object. The struct "RGWBucketEntryPoint" contain a pointer to the bucket instance info. I want to know why to separate bucket name and instance at that time. Thanks for the reply!

Re: [ceph-users] The RGW create new bucket instance then delete it at every create bucket OP

t; Can you post the example steps to reproduce the problem ? > > Also what version of Ceph RGW are you running ? > > Saverio > > > 2016-05-18 10:24 GMT+02:00 fangchen sun <sunspot0...@gmail.com>: > > Dear ALL, > > > > I found a problem that the RGW create a new

[ceph-users] The RGW create new bucket instance then delete it at every create bucket OP

Dear ALL, I found a problem that the RGW create a new bucket instance and delete the bucket instance at every create bucket OP with same name http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/API/ErrorResponses.html According to the error code "BucketAlreadyOwnedByYou" from the above link, shouldn't

Re: [ceph-users] xfs corruption

top > rated culprit in Ceph environments. > > 3-) If you are using SSD disk, make sure you use non-raid configuration. > > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 10:55 PM, fangchen sun <sunspot0...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Dear all: >> >> I have a ceph objec

[ceph-users] xfs corruption

Dear all: I have a ceph object storage cluster with 143 osd and 7 radosgw, and choose XFS as the underlying file system. I recently ran into a problem that sometimes a osd is marked down when the returned value of the function "chain_setxattr()" is -117. I only umount the disk and repair it with

Re: [ceph-users] about federated gateway

Hi, I open an issue, and the link is as following: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14081 Thanks Sunfch 2015-12-15 2:33 GMT+08:00 Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub : > On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 7:27 AM, 孙方臣 wrote: > > Hi, All, > > > > I'm setting up federated

Re: [ceph-users] multi radosgw-agent

recommend that as it's severely under > tested. Good chance that the agents will step on each other's toes. You can > modify there number of concurrent threads for the agents, might be enough > for your requirements. > > Yehuda > On Nov 27, 2015 2:40 AM, "fangchen sun" <sunfa