Re: [ceph-users] ceph-fuse performance about hammer and jewel

2016-06-05 Thread qisy
Yan, Zheng: Thanks for your reply. But change into jewel, application read/write disk slowly. confirms the fio tested iops. Does there any other possibles? 在 16/6/1 21:39, Yan, Zheng 写道: On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 6:52 PM, qisy wrote: my test fio fio -ioengine=libaio -bs=4k

Re: [ceph-users] ceph-fuse performance about hammer and jewel

2016-06-01 Thread qisy
my test fio fio -ioengine=libaio -bs=4k -direct=1 -thread -rw=randwrite -size=1G -filename=test.iso -name="CEPH 4KB randwrite test" -iodepth=32 -runtime=60 在 16/6/1 15:22, Yan, Zheng 写道: On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 10:22 PM, qisy wrote: Hi, After jewel released fs product rea

[ceph-users] ceph-fuse performance about hammer and jewel

2016-05-30 Thread qisy
Hi, After jewel released fs product ready version, I upgrade the old hammer cluster, but iops droped a lot I made a test, with 3 nodes, each one have 8c 16G 1osd, the osd device got 15000 iops I found ceph-fuse client has better performance on hammer than jewel. fio randwrit