Re: [ceph-users] Upgrade from Giant 0.87-1 to Hammer 0.94-1

Now I also know I have too many PGs! It is fairly confusing to talk about PGs on the Pool page, but only vaguely talk about the number of PGs for the cluster. Here are some examples of confusing statements with suggested alternatives from the online docs: http://ceph.com/docs/master/rados/op

Re: [ceph-users] Upgrade from Giant 0.87-1 to Hammer 0.94-1

> On 16/04/2015, at 11.09, Christian Balzer wrote: > > On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 10:46:35 +0200 Steffen W Sørensen wrote: > >>> That later change would have _increased_ the number of recommended PG, >>> not decreased it. >> Weird as our Giant health status was ok before upgrading to Hammer… >> > I'm

Re: [ceph-users] Upgrade from Giant 0.87-1 to Hammer 0.94-1

On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 10:46:35 +0200 Steffen W Sørensen wrote: > > That later change would have _increased_ the number of recommended PG, > > not decreased it. > Weird as our Giant health status was ok before upgrading to Hammer… > I'm pretty sure the "too many" check was added around then, and the

Re: [ceph-users] Upgrade from Giant 0.87-1 to Hammer 0.94-1

On 16/04/2015, at 01.48, Steffen W Sørensen wrote: > > Also our calamari web UI won't authenticate anymore, can’t see any issues in > any log under /var/log/calamari, any hints on what to look for are > appreciated, TIA! Well this morning it will authenticate me, but seems calamari can’t talk t

Re: [ceph-users] Upgrade from Giant 0.87-1 to Hammer 0.94-1

> That later change would have _increased_ the number of recommended PG, not > decreased it. Weird as our Giant health status was ok before upgrading to Hammer… > With your cluster 2048 PGs total (all pools combined!) would be the sweet > spot, see: > > http://ceph.com/pgcalc/

Re: [ceph-users] Upgrade from Giant 0.87-1 to Hammer 0.94-1

Hello, On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 00:41:29 +0200 Steffen W Sørensen wrote: > Hi, > > Successfully upgrade a small development 4x node Giant 0.87-1 cluster to > Hammer 0.94-1, each node with 6x OSD - 146GB, 19 pools, mainly 2 in > usage. Only minor thing now ceph -s complaining over too may PGs, > prev

Re: [ceph-users] Upgrade from Giant 0.87-1 to Hammer 0.94-1

Also our calamari web UI won't authenticate anymore, can’t see any issues in any log under /var/log/calamari, any hints on what to look for are appreciated, TIA! # dpkg -l | egrep -i calamari\|ceph ii calamari-clients 1.2.3.1-2-gc1f14b2all Inktank Calamar

[ceph-users] Upgrade from Giant 0.87-1 to Hammer 0.94-1

Hi, Successfully upgrade a small development 4x node Giant 0.87-1 cluster to Hammer 0.94-1, each node with 6x OSD - 146GB, 19 pools, mainly 2 in usage. Only minor thing now ceph -s complaining over too may PGs, previously Giant had complain of too few, so various pools were bumped up till health