Re: [ceph-users] Bad IO performance CephFS vs. NFS for block size 4k/128k

2017-09-04 Thread Christian Balzer
Hello, On Mon, 04 Sep 2017 15:27:34 + c.mo...@web.de wrote: > Hello! > > I'm validating IO performance of CephFS vs. NFS. > Well, at this point you seem to be comparing apples to bananas. You're telling us results, but your mail lacks crucial information required to give you a qualified an

Re: [ceph-users] Bad IO performance CephFS vs. NFS for block size 4k/128k

2017-09-04 Thread David
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 4:27 PM, wrote: > Hello! > > I'm validating IO performance of CephFS vs. NFS. > > Therefore I have mounted the relevant filesystems on the same client. > Then I start fio with the following parameters: > action = randwrite randrw > blocksize = 4k 128k 8m > rwmixreadread = 7

[ceph-users] Bad IO performance CephFS vs. NFS for block size 4k/128k

2017-09-04 Thread c . monty
Hello! I'm validating IO performance of CephFS vs. NFS. Therefore I have mounted the relevant filesystems on the same client. Then I start fio with the following parameters: action = randwrite randrw blocksize = 4k 128k 8m rwmixreadread = 70 50 30 32 jobs run in parallel The NFS share is stripin