Hey Ceph folks,
I was wondering what the current status/roadmap/intentions etc. are on the
possibility of providing a way of transitioning a cluster from IPv4 to IPv6 in
the future.
My current understanding is that this not possible at the moment and that one
should deploy initially with the v
> Op 27 juni 2017 om 19:00 schreef george.vasilaka...@stfc.ac.uk:
>
>
> Hey Ceph folks,
>
> I was wondering what the current status/roadmap/intentions etc. are on the
> possibility of providing a way of transitioning a cluster from IPv4 to IPv6
> in the future.
>
> My current understanding i
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 2:19 PM Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
> > Op 27 juni 2017 om 19:00 schreef george.vasilaka...@stfc.ac.uk:
> >
> >
> > Hey Ceph folks,
> >
> > I was wondering what the current status/roadmap/intentions etc. are on
> the possibility of providing a way of transitioning a cluste
os, George
(STFC,RAL,SC)
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Ceph and IPv4 -> IPv6
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 2:19 PM Wido den Hollander
mailto:w...@42on.com>> wrote:
> Op 27 juni 2017 om 19:00 schreef
> george.vasilaka...@stfc.ac.uk<mailto:george.vasilaka...@stfc.ac.uk>:
>
>
>
their production
set ups.
Best regards,
George
From: Wido den Hollander [w...@42on.com]
Sent: 27 June 2017 19:19
To: Vasilakakos, George (STFC,RAL,SC); ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Ceph and IPv4 -> IPv6
> Op 27 juni 2017 om 19:00 sch
there is any code in the source right now.
Wido
> Best regards,
>
> George
>
> From: Wido den Hollander [w...@42on.com]
> Sent: 27 June 2017 19:19
> To: Vasilakakos, George (STFC,RAL,SC); ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> Subject: Re:
> Wido
>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> George
>>
>> From: Wido den Hollander [w...@42on.com]
>> Sent: 27 June 2017 19:19
>> To: Vasilakakos, George (STFC,RAL,SC); ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>> Subject: Re: [
nd of deal.
>
> From: Wido den Hollander [w...@42on.com]
> Sent: 27 June 2017 19:19
> To: Vasilakakos, George (STFC,RAL,SC); ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Ceph and IPv4 -> IPv6
>
> > Op 27 juni 2017 om
setting monitor IP addresses instead of hosts),
and then turning it all back on should work but you're on your own... ;)
-Greg
>
>
> >
> > From: Wido den Hollander [w...@42on.com]
> > Sent: 27 June 2017 19:19
> > To: Vasilakakos, George (STFC,RAL,SC); ceph-users@lists.
will be recorded in the OSDMap.
Wido
>
> >
> >
> > >
> > > From: Wido den Hollander [w...@42on.com]
> > > Sent: 27 June 2017 19:19
> > > To: Vasilakakos, George (STFC,RAL,SC); ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> >
nd update the MONMap. Afterwards
the OSDs will boot and 'up' themselves in the cluster with their IPv6 address
and that will be recorded in the OSDMap.
Wido
>
> >
> >
> > >
> > > From: Wido den Hollander [w...@42on
> the OSDs will boot and 'up' themselves in the cluster with their IPv6 address
> and that will be recorded in the OSDMap.
>
> Wido
>
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > From: Wido den
> I have it running the other way around. The RGW has IPv4 and IPv6, but
> the Ceph cluster is IPv6-only.
> RGW/librados talks to Ceph ovre IPv6 and handles client traffic on
> both protocols.
> No problem to run the RGW dual-stacked.
Just for the record, we've been doing exactly the same for se
Good to know. Frankly, the RGW isn’t my major concern at the moment, it seems
to be able to handle things well enough.
It’s the RBD/CephFS side of things for one cluster where we will eventually
need to support IPv6 clients but will not necessarily be able to switch
everyone to IPv6 in one go.
14 matches
Mail list logo
