All,
I wish to experiment with erasure-coded pools in Ceph.  I've got some questions:

1.      Is FIREFLY a reasonable release to be using to try EC pools?  When I 
look at various bits of development info, it appears that the work is complete 
in FIREFLY, but I thought I'd askJ

2.      It looks, in FIREFLY, as if not all I/O operations can be performed on 
EC pools.  I am trying to work with RBD clients, and I've run into some 
conflicting information... can RBDs run on EC pools directly, or is a caching 
tier required?

a.      Assuming a cache tier is required, where might I read information on 
sizing the cache tier?

b.      Looking through the issues, it appears there are some race conditions 
(e.g., #9285<http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/9285>) for cache tiers in FIREFLY.  
Should I avoid cache tiers at this level?  At what level, if any, are these 
addressed (I don't see commits in #9285<http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/9285>, 
for example)?

3.      When configuring EC pools, to specify the number of PGs, can I 
reasonably assume that I should use (K+M) instead of a replica count?  So, for 
example, if I have 24 OSDs, and my EC profile has K=8 and M=4, then I should 
specify 200 (i.e., (24*100)/12) placement groups?

4.      As I add OSDs, can I adjust the number of PGs?
Thanks in advance...
_______________________________________________________

Don Doerner
Quantum Corporation

----------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this transmission may be confidential. Any 
disclosure, copying, or further distribution of confidential information is not 
permitted unless such privilege is explicitly granted in writing by Quantum. 
Quantum reserves the right to have electronic communications, including email 
and attachments, sent across its networks filtered through anti virus and spam 
software programs and retain such messages in order to comply with applicable 
data security and retention requirements. Quantum is not responsible for the 
proper and complete transmission of the substance of this communication or for 
any delay in its receipt.
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to