Re: [ceph-users] Ceph performances

2015-11-30 Thread Rémi BUISSON
Hello Robert, OK. I already tried this but as you said performances decrease. I just built the 10.0.0 version and it seems that there are some regressions in there. I've now 3.5 Kiops instead of 21 Kiops in 9.2.0 :-/ Thanks. Rémi Le 2015-11-25 18:54, Robert LeBlanc a écrit : -BEGIN PGP

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph performances

2015-11-25 Thread Robert LeBlanc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I'm really surprised that you are getting 100K IOPs from the Intel S3610s. We are already in the process of ordering some to test along side other drives, so I should be able to verify that as well. With the S3700 and S3500, I was able to only get 20

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph performances

2015-11-25 Thread Rémi BUISSON
Hello Hugo, Yes you're right. With Sebastien Han fio command I manage to see that my disks can finally handle 100 Kiops, so the theoritical value is then: 2 x 2 x 100 / 2 = 200k. I put the journal on the SSDSC2BX016T4R which is then supposed to double my IOs, but it's not the case. Rémi

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph performances

2015-11-25 Thread Rémi BUISSON
Hello Robert, Sorry for late answer. Thanks for your reply. I updated to infernalis and I applied all your recommendations but it doesn't change anything, with or without cache tiering :-/ I also compared XFS to EXT4 and BTRFS but it doesn't make the difference. The fio command from Seba

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph performances

2015-11-09 Thread Björn Lässig
On 11/07/2015 09:44 AM, Oliver Dzombic wrote: > setting inode64 in osd_mount_options_xfs might help a little. sorry, inode64 is the default mount option with xfs. Björn ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinf

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph performances

2015-11-07 Thread Hugo Slabbert
On Sat 2015-Nov-07 09:24:06 +0100, Rémi BUISSON wrote: Hi guys, I would need your help to figure out performance issues on my ceph cluster. I've read pretty much every thread on the net concerning this topic but I didn't manage to have acceptable performances. In my company, we are planning

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph performances

2015-11-07 Thread Robert LeBlanc
You most likely did the wrong test to get baseline Ceph IOPS or of your ssds. Ceph is really hard on SSDS and it does direct sync writes which drives handle very different even between models of the same brand. Start with http://www.sebastien-han.fr/blog/2014/10/10/ceph-how-to-test-if-your-ssd-is-s

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph performances

2015-11-07 Thread Rémi BUISSON
Hello, I just saw the release announce of infernalis. I will test it in the meantime. Rémi On 07/11/2015 09:24, Rémi BUISSON wrote: Hi guys, I would need your help to figure out performance issues on my ceph cluster. I've read pretty much every thread on the net concerning this topic but

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph performances

2015-11-07 Thread Oliver Dzombic
Hi Remi, setting inode64 in osd_mount_options_xfs might help a little. -- Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best regards Oliver Dzombic ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[ceph-users] Ceph performances

2015-11-07 Thread Rémi BUISSON
Hi guys, I would need your help to figure out performance issues on my ceph cluster. I've read pretty much every thread on the net concerning this topic but I didn't manage to have acceptable performances. In my company, we are planning to replace our existing virtualization infrastucture NAS b