On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:43 PM, Jan Schermer wrote:
> I'd be worried about it getting "fast" all of sudden. Test crash
> consistency.
> If you test something like file creation you should be able to estimate if
> it should be that fast. (So it should be some fraction of
It should be noted that using "async" with NFS _will_ corrupt your data if
anything happens.
It's ok-ish for something like an image library, but it's most certainly not OK
for VM drives, databases, or if you write any kind of binary blobs that you
can't recreate.
If ceph-fuse is fast (you
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 10:29 PM, David wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I'm having an issue with slow writes over NFS (v3) when cephfs is mounted
> with the kernel driver. Writing a single 4K file from the NFS client is
> taking 3 - 4 seconds, however a 4K write (with sync) into the
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 10:29 PM, David wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I'm having an issue with slow writes over NFS (v3) when cephfs is mounted
> with the kernel driver. Writing a single 4K file from the NFS client is
> taking 3 - 4 seconds, however a 4K write (with sync) into the
Hi All
I'm having an issue with slow writes over NFS (v3) when cephfs is mounted
with the kernel driver. Writing a single 4K file from the NFS client is
taking 3 - 4 seconds, however a 4K write (with sync) into the same folder
on the server is fast as you would expect. When mounted with