I think stable mds daemon and fsck or a way to recover some of the data
once the mds crash is the only thing we need.
We are using ceph as a very big fs for doing nightly backups of our 3000+
servers. We have some front servers doing rsync over slow adsl lines,
saving all data on a very big cephfs
On 5 Mar 2013, at 17:03, Greg Farnum wrote:
> This is a companion discussion to the blog post at
> http://ceph.com/dev-notes/cephfs-mds-status-discussion/ — go read that!
>
> The short and slightly alternate version: I spent most of about two weeks
> working on bugs related to snapshots in the
On 3/5/2013 11:01 PM, Neil Levine wrote:
As an extra request, it would be great if people explained a little
about their use-case for the filesystem so we can better understand
how the features requested map to the type of workloads people are
trying.
For the simple case of a basic file server:
As an extra request, it would be great if people explained a little
about their use-case for the filesystem so we can better understand
how the features requested map to the type of workloads people are
trying.
Thanks
Neil
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Greg Farnum wrote:
> This is a companion
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Kevin Decherf wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 12:27:04PM -0600, Dino Yancey wrote:
> > The only two features I'd deem necessary for our workload would be
> > stable distributed metadata / MDS and a working fsck equivalent.
> > Snapshots would be great once the f
On 03/05/2013 03:25 PM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
> On 03/05/2013 02:13 PM, Steven Presser wrote:
>> I'm currently running centos on 3.6.9 and only haven't updated it
>> because of my own laziness. I'd be happy to provide .config files for
>> this.
I mean, thanks for the offer, but the issue isn't th
On 03/05/2013 02:13 PM, Steven Presser wrote:
> I'm currently running centos on 3.6.9 and only haven't updated it
> because of my own laziness. I'd be happy to provide .config files for
> this.
I only have about 60 hosts here and 3 dozen more downstairs, plus a
bunch of programming projects. Gene
I'm currently running centos on 3.6.9 and only haven't updated it
because of my own laziness. I'd be happy to provide .config files for this.
On 03/05/2013 01:38 PM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
On 03/05/2013 12:27 PM, Dino Yancey wrote:
The only two features I'd deem necessary for our workload wou
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 12:27:04PM -0600, Dino Yancey wrote:
> The only two features I'd deem necessary for our workload would be
> stable distributed metadata / MDS and a working fsck equivalent.
> Snapshots would be great once the feature is deemed stable, as would
We have the same needs here.
On 03/05/2013 12:27 PM, Dino Yancey wrote:
> The only two features I'd deem necessary for our workload would be
> stable distributed metadata / MDS and a working fsck equivalent.
> Snapshots would be great once the feature is deemed stable, as would
> nfs / cifs reexport, and quota support eventual
The only two features I'd deem necessary for our workload would be
stable distributed metadata / MDS and a working fsck equivalent.
Snapshots would be great once the feature is deemed stable, as would
nfs / cifs reexport, and quota support eventually would be nice to
have. Anything else is gravy.
This is a companion discussion to the blog post at
http://ceph.com/dev-notes/cephfs-mds-status-discussion/ — go read that!
The short and slightly alternate version: I spent most of about two weeks
working on bugs related to snapshots in the MDS, and we started realizing that
we could probably d
12 matches
Mail list logo
